Clicky

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2

Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-2 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL2
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Revealed March 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus SH-1
  • Later Model is Olympus SH-3
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus SH-2, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-PL3 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the SH-2 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-PL3 grades vs the SH-2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus SH-2

 E-PL3 SH-2 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-PL3

 SH-2 E-PL3 
RevealedMarch 2015September 2011More recent by 42 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus SH-2

 E-PL3 SH-2 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Screen resolution460k460kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL3 offers outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus SH-2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL3 against the SH-2.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL3 and SH-2 is 88 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The graphic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL3 and SH-2.

Plainly, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL3 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus SH-2 will give extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-PL3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL3
Portrait photography with Olympus SH-2
60
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
resolution not great (12MP)
44
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 as a Street photography camera
Olympus SH-2 as a Street photography camera
84
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
70
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
supports focus by touch
lighter than competitors in class (271 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Sports photography features
Olympus SH-2 Sports photography features
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
low fps (6.0 frames/s)
resolution not great (12MP)
terrible battery power (300 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
51
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Travel photography info
Olympus SH-2 Travel photography info
44
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (300 shots)
resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
74
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (271g)
supports focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL3
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-2
61
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
terrible battery power (300 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
55
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PL3
Vlogging with Olympus SH-2
34
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone socket
35
pretty wide (25mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (271g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus SH-2
 Olympus PEN E-PL3Olympus Stylus SH-2
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL3 Olympus Stylus SH-2
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-09-20 2015-03-11
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Truepic VI TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 12800 6400
Min native ISO 200 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 6.0 frames per sec 11.5 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/160 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format AVCHD, Motion JPEG H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 313g (0.69 pounds) 271g (0.60 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 52 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.9 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 499 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs 380 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots One One
Launch price $399 $399