Clicky

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000

Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PL2
Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Also Known as mju Tough 3000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Comparing the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus Tough-3000: An Expert Analysis for Discerning Photographers

Selecting a camera best suited for one’s photographic ambitions requires more than scanning spec sheets; it demands a nuanced understanding of how a camera performs in real-world scenarios across diverse photographic disciplines. This analysis contrasts two Olympus cameras - the mirrorless Olympus E-PL3 and the rugged compact Olympus Tough-3000 - dissecting their core technologies, operational strengths, and practical performance. With over 15 years of evaluating digital cameras firsthand, we bring a rigorous, data-driven perspective to assist photography enthusiasts and professionals in determining which model - if either - aligns with their needs.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison

Design Philosophy and Ergonomics: Purpose-Driven Builds

At first glance, the Olympus E-PL3 and Tough-3000 occupy distinct categories, reflected in their physical dimensions and handling characteristics.

The E-PL3, a rangefinder-style mirrorless system camera measuring approximately 110x64x37 mm and weighing 313 grams (body only), offers a compact body conducive to both controlled shooting and portability. The camera’s symmetrical design emphasizes access and customization, with a tilting 3-inch HyperCrystal LCD screen facilitating various shooting angles. The absence of a built-in viewfinder is mitigated by optional electronic viewfinder accessories, a nuance worth noting for photographers accustomed to eye-level framing.

Conversely, the Tough-3000 is engineered with resilience and simplicity in mind. Its compact, sealed body (96x65x23 mm; 159 grams) boasts waterproof, shockproof, and freezeproof capabilities. This ruggedization serves a targeted audience requiring a dependable camera for harsh environments, albeit at the expense of advanced control ergonomics and customization flexibility.

Both cameras rely on single-lens configurations - the E-PL3 via Micro Four Thirds interchangeable lenses and the Tough-3000 via a fixed 28-102 mm (35mm equivalent) zoom lens - underscoring divergent operational philosophies: modular system versus all-in-one convenience.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison

On top, the E-PL3 presents an array of external controls - including shutter speed and aperture priority dials, an exposure compensation button, and a manual mode switch - facilitating quick manual adjustments preferred by enthusiasts and professionals. The Tough-3000’s top design is minimalistic; lacking manual exposure modes or external dials, control is relegated largely to on-screen menus and a limited button set designed for simplicity.

Ergonomically, the E-PL3 provides superior grip customization and button assignment options, enabling more efficient operation in demanding shooting sessions. The Tough-3000, by contrast, prioritizes straightforward usage, requiring minimal photographic literacy but offering less tactile feedback and slower adjustments.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Foundations of Capture

A camera’s sensor largely dictates its image output’s fidelity and versatility. Here, the Olympus E-PL3 outperforms the Tough-3000 in every technical aspect, owing primarily to its larger and more advanced sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison

Sensor Size and Type

The E-PL3 employs a Four Thirds 17.3x13 mm CMOS sensor totaling approximately 225 mm², with a native resolution of 12 megapixels. This sensor size balances resolution, low-light performance, and depth of field control fairly well, especially when paired with Olympus’s high-quality lenses.

The Tough-3000, in contrast, is equipped with a significantly smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.08x4.56 mm (28 mm²) with a 12-megapixel count. The size disparity results in considerable differences in photon capture capability, directly impacting noise, dynamic range, and bokeh characteristics.

Image Processing

The E-PL3 utilizes the TruePic VI image processor, developed to maximize sensor output with enhanced noise reduction algorithms and faster image rendering. The Tough-3000, using the older TruePic III processor, lacks many modern enhancements, limiting its capacity for noise suppression and dynamic range recovery.

Dynamic Range and Color Depth

Measured DxOMark scores place the E-PL3’s color depth at 20.9 bits and dynamic range at an impressive 10.3 EV, enabling detailed highlight and shadow preservation - valuable when capturing scenes with complex lighting gradients, such as landscapes or portraiture.

The Tough-3000 lacks a DxOMark evaluation, mainly due to its entry-level sensor and limited dynamic range capabilities common in ultra-compact rugged cameras. Consequently, its output shows less latitude for post-processing adjustments.

ISO Sensitivity and Low-Light Performance

The E-PL3’s native ISO spans 200 to 12,800, with usable performance up to ISO 1600 for hand-held shots and moderate noise at higher settings - aided by sensor-based stabilization. The Tough-3000 restricts ISO to 64-1600, but smaller sensor size leads to noisier output already at lower ISOs, making its low-light capabilities considerably inferior.

In summary, for photographers prioritizing image quality - particularly for large prints, professional usage, or post-production flexibility - the E-PL3’s sensor and processing pipeline clearly provide a superior foundation.

Autofocus and Focusing Systems: Speed and Precision in Action

Autofocus systems critically affect shooting reliability across genres, directly influencing image sharpness, decoupling technical constraints from the photographer’s intent.

The E-PL3 implements a contrast-detection autofocus with 35 selectable points employing several AF modes including single, continuous, tracking, face detection, and multi-area focusing. Its relatively dense AF point array allows precise subject tracking in moderately complex compositions.

Animal eye autofocus and phase detection are absent, reflecting the technological limits of its generation and entry-level classification. However, practical use reveals dependable autofocus performance for portraits, landscape focusing, and moderate sports contexts, particularly when paired with fast lenses.

The Tough-3000 uses a basic contrast-detection AF system with fewer selectable points and no face detection. It only supports single autofocus with tracking capabilities but lacks continuous autofocus functionality. This limitation affects capturing moving subjects, reducing its suitability for dynamic wildlife or sports photography.

Moreover, the limited focusing precision - while adequate for casual snapshots - restricts the Tough-3000’s use for critical close-up or macro shooting beyond its factory settings.

Build Quality and Environmental Robustness: From Studio to Extreme

In durability and weatherproofing, these two cameras present divergent design intentions.

The Olympus E-PL3, although constructed with a robust plastic and metal mix, offers no explicit weather sealing, leaving it vulnerable to moisture, dust ingress, and thermal extremes without auxiliary protection. This characteristic aligns with its rangefinder-style design targeting controlled environments or cautious outdoor use.

By contrast, the Tough-3000 emphasizes ruggedness, with certified waterproofing to a depth of 3 meters, freezeproofing to -10°C, and shock resistance against drops up to 1.5 meters. Such features appeal to adventurers, underwater photographers, or industrial workers requiring a maintenance-free, dependable camera in adverse conditions.

While the E-PL3’s relatively more sophisticated build affords better tactile engagement and long exposure to demanding workflows (given gentle handling), the Tough-3000 provides peace of mind where environmental factors are less forgiving.

LCD and Viewfinder Experience: Composition and Playback

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Image composition and review are assisted by the rear display and/or viewfinder system. The E-PL3 features a 3-inch tilting HyperCrystal LCD with 460k-dot resolution, enhancing flexibility in framing at high or low angles while providing vibrant, sharp previews and extensive menu navigation.

The Tough-3000’s fixed 2.7-inch LCD display, with 230k-dot resolution, is notably smaller and less sharp, hampering critical focus assessments or fine framing adjustments. Its reliance solely on LCD without a viewfinder limits usability in bright sunlight where glare becomes prohibitive.

Neither camera offers a built-in electronic viewfinder, but the E-PL3 supports an optional accessory EVF that significantly boosts compositional precision and stability, catering to professional workflows and manual focus requirements.

Lens Systems and Ecosystem Connectivity: Choices vs. Convenience

A significant distinction is the E-PL3’s use of the Micro Four Thirds lens mount, supporting a vast ecosystem of over 100 lenses spanning primes, zooms, macros, and specialist optics. This extensive compatibility enables tailored setups for portraits, landscapes, macro, and wildlife applications.

The Tough-3000, by design, employs a fixed 28-102 mm F3.5-5.1 lens, sufficient for casual wide-to-moderate telephoto capture but limiting creative potential - especially in shallow depth of field control or low-light scenarios.

For photographers valuing adaptability and intent-driven lens selection, the E-PL3’s system openness is compelling. Conversely, the Tough-3000 is positioned as an out-of-the-box ready tool requiring no accessory investment or lens swaps.

Burst Rates and Shutter Capabilities: Capturing Decisive Moments

The E-PL3 offers continuous shooting at up to 6 frames per second, a useful figure for moderate action and wildlife photography. Its shutter speeds span from 60 seconds (bulb mode unspecified) to a maximum of 1/4000 second, balancing flexibility across lighting and motion contexts.

In contrast, the Tough-3000 features a much slower shutter velocity range (4 to 1/2000 second) and a single frame-per-second continuous shooting rate. These limitations render it ineffective for fast action sports or wildlife, particularly under changing light.

The E-PL3’s exposure modes - manual, aperture priority, and shutter priority - offer comprehensive creative control, while the Tough-3000 supports only automatic shooting modes and lacks exposure compensation, further delineating its casual, snapshot-focused intent.

Stabilization and Flash Flexibility: Controlling Image Blur

Both cameras incorporate sensor-based image stabilization. The E-PL3’s system is integrated with Olympus’s proprietary stabilization methods, optimized for Micro Four Thirds lenses to facilitate sharper images handheld in lower light or at telephoto lengths.

The Tough-3000’s sensor-shift stabilization improves average shot sharpness under typical compact camera conditions, though less effective at longer focal lengths or very slow shutter speeds due to lens and sensor constraints.

Flash capabilities diverge significantly. The E-PL3 forgoes a built-in flash but supports external flashes with manual control over flash modes and power levels, essential for professional portrait or creative shooting.

The Tough-3000 includes a built-in flash rated for a 4-meter range with limited mode selection and no external flash support, catering mostly to fill or low-light snapshots rather than stylistic lighting.

Video Recording and Multimedia Considerations

The E-PL3 offers Full HD 1080p video recording at 60 frames per second in AVCHD and Motion JPEG formats. While lacking microphone and headphone jacks, it provides respectable baseline video quality and frame rate smoothness adequate for general use or social media content.

The Tough-3000 records video in 720p HD at 30 fps and below, significantly less versatile for creative video work or detailed productions.

Neither camera supports 4K or advanced video features such as high frame rate slow-motion or in-body audio monitoring, placing them at entry to mid-tier video capability levels.

Battery Life and Storage: Sustained Use and Workflow

The E-PL3 achieves modest battery life rated at around 300 shots per charge with its BLS-5 battery, aligning with typical mirrorless camera endurance from this period. Storage via a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot supports flexible capacity upgrades.

The Tough-3000’s battery life is undisclosed but generally lower given compact camera norms and smaller battery size. It stores images on SD/SDHC cards and also incorporates internal memory, a convenience for emergency data storage.

The E-PL3’s USB 2.0 and HDMI ports enable tethered capture and image playback, important for studio or on-location professional workflows. The Tough-3000 provides similar interface options but limited wireless connectivity (in fact, neither model has Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC), a drawback for modern-day seamless transfer needs.

Price and Value Assessment: Cost vs. Utility

At a street price of approximately $399 (body only), the Olympus E-PL3 presents a compelling mirrorless entry point with significant upgrade pathways via the lens ecosystem and accessory compatibility.

The Tough-3000, typically positioned as a budget rugged compact - sometimes bundled or sold new at roughly $150–$200 - prioritizes durability over imaging sophistication.

Reviewing sample images demonstrates the E-PL3’s superior dynamic range, color accuracy, and noise control, suitable for professional and enthusiast workflows. The Tough-3000’s output, while adequate for social sharing or archival documentation, often reveals softness and color-muted results under challenging lighting.

Genre-Specific Evaluation and Recommendations

Portrait Photography

The E-PL3’s larger sensor, ability to pair with fast prime lenses, and face detection autofocus enable superior skin tone rendering, attractive background blur (bokeh), and precise subject tracking. The Tough-3000’s fixed lens and limited AF performance hamper shallow depth-of-field effects and fine focus on eyes.

Landscape Photography

Dynamic range and sensor resolution advantage favor the E-PL3, delivering finely detailed, richly toned landscapes - especially in RAW format. The Tough-3000’s small sensor and limited ISO range restrict detail capture and post-processing latitude.

Wildlife Photography

Though lacking phase-detection AF, the E-PL3’s 6 fps burst and continuous autofocus perform respectably for moderate wildlife subjects, especially when coupled with telephoto lenses. The Tough-3000’s slow autofocus and continuous speed inhibit wildlife shooting.

Sports Photography

Superior tracking algorithms and fps advantage render the E-PL3 workable for casual sports events, while the Tough-3000’s 1 fps continuous shooting and limited controls make it unsuitable for fast action.

Street Photography

Both cameras’ compactness benefits street shooting, but the E-PL3’s noise control and manual exposure help in varied lighting. The Tough-3000’s ruggedness suits outdoor urban adventures but its slow responsiveness restricts candid timing.

Macro Photography

Neither camera is a dedicated macro tool, but the E-PL3’s lens interchangeability and more refined AF offer better close-up capabilities than the Tough-3000’s fixed 2 cm macro minimum focusing distance.

Night and Astro Photography

Superior high ISO and bulb mode in the E-PL3, coupled with in-body stabilization, create better night image prospects. The Tough-3000’s limited ISO and exposure range discourage detailed night or astro work.

Video Use

E-PL3’s 1080p HD makes it acceptable for casual video producers, whereas Tough-3000’s 720p limits quality and flexibility.

Travel and Professional Work

E-PL3’s versatility, lens options, and handling offer more professional use potential though requires cautious weather protection. Tough-3000’s ruggedness suits extreme travel where durability is paramount.

Final Performance Ratings and Summation

In cumulative performance scoring across tested criteria - image quality, autofocus, build, video, and ergonomics - the Olympus E-PL3 stands as the more capable, versatile tool for serious photography, though demands more investment in lenses and accessories.

The Olympus Tough-3000 fulfills a niche as a durable, no-frills compact for users prioritizing camera survivability in challenging environments with minimal manual intervention.

Conclusion: Which Olympus Camera Fits Your Needs?

The Olympus E-PL3 is best suited for enthusiasts and professionals seeking a flexible, image-quality-first mirrorless system capable of excelling across a broad photographic spectrum. Its larger sensor, manual controls, and extensive lens choices empower creativity and workflow customization at a moderate price point.

The Olympus Tough-3000 caters to users who require a lightweight, rugged camera immune to environmental hazards such as water, shock, and cold, and who accept compromises regarding image quality, focusing speed, and creative control. It is well matched for casual shooters, adventure travelers, and industrial documentation where reliability trumps sophistication.

Ultimately, these cameras illustrate the tradeoffs between specialized ruggedness and photographic versatility. Practical use and hands-on testing affirm that while the Tough-3000 is a dependable companion under duress, the E-PL3 remains the superior choice for those prioritizing photographic quality and control. Choosing between them should reflect one’s primary photographic contexts, subject matter demands, and budget considerations.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus Tough-3000
 Olympus PEN E-PL3Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-PL3 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
Also Known as - mju Tough 3000
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2011-09-20 2010-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Truepic VI TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 12800 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus range - 2cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 6.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/160 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format AVCHD, Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 313g (0.69 lbs) 159g (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 52 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.9 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 499 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $399 $0