Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Launched September 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is very close but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL3 was launched 21 months later than the Tough-3000 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-PL3 grades against the Tough-3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL3 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 21 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-PL3
Tough-3000 | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL3 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL3 provides outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL3 and the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5f53/b5f53afd20a44ca43e45f70ccd2547231cc4874e" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL3 and Tough-3000 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd353/fd353d717dadb96bdbb7dfb7011a7841d05a17e7" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL3 and Tough-3000.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL3 uses the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler. The younger E-PL3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0088/e0088d7c9ae86bab11ce0e3aedc9446f89848a7d" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37ee4/37ee480cbff8a53d97f7a5a5bd6ee6ca2299b67f" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2011-09-20 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $399 | $0 |