Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a8dd/4a8dd561f31a1ef05032a3f55300768a5c6ad484" alt="Sony Alpha a3500 front Sony Alpha a3500 front"
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Announced September 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Announced March 2014
- Replaced the Sony A3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL3 and Sony a3500, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and a3500 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL3 was released 3 years before the a3500 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PL3 scores against the a3500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Sony Alpha a3500. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Sony a3500
E-PL3 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Olympus E-PL3
a3500 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 30 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Sony a3500
E-PL3 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL3 enjoys physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Sony a3500 has proportions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL3 and Sony a3500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL3 compared to the a3500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ce01/3ce017b706dfdb49810c03bca9941df8ad165421" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and a3500 is 88 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0e4b/a0e4bdac6728909760b4bfe50b16b1f800dee8da" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The picture below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL3 and a3500.
All in all, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL3 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony a3500 will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-PL3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2569/b256931f1875e226eb3e7b648561ec6d74370557" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7c67/b7c67397fe3408300ac721f72ef3fb2e89e26092" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-09-20 | 2014-03-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic VI | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5456 x 3632 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lbs) | 411g (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 470 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $399 | $398 |