Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony a5100
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60


89 Imaging
65 Features
74 Overall
68
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony a5100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 283g - 110 x 63 x 36mm
- Released August 2014
- Previous Model is Sony a5000

Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony a5100: Hands-On Mirrorless Showdown for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing your next mirrorless camera can feel like navigating a maze - especially when budget options like the Olympus PEN E-PL5 and Sony Alpha a5100 are quite compelling in their own right, despite their vintage release dates. With years of hands-on testing inside and out of the lab under my belt, I’ve pitted these two entry-level mirrorless cameras head-to-head to help you see past the spec sheet and grasp what really matters when you put them behind the lens.
I’ll cover everything from their sensor wizardry to autofocus mojo, ergonomics, handling in specific genres, and how well each fits into a working pro’s or serious enthusiast’s workflow. And, of course, I’ll integrate rich, real-world anecdotes from my personal shooting sessions with both cameras.
Size, Handling, and Ergonomics: What Fits Your Hands and Style?
I always start with the feel factor when testing cameras. If the body fights you, you’ll spend less time shooting and more grappling with controls.
Here’s how the Olympus E-PL5 and Sony a5100 stack up physically:
The Olympus E-PL5 is a bit chunkier at 111x64x38mm and weighs 325 grams, whereas the Sony a5100 is sleeker (110x63x36mm) and lighter at 283 grams. Both exude a rangefinder-style mirrorless look, but Olympus’s slightly deeper grip edges it towards better handling for folks with bigger hands or those who prefer something tangible to clutch during long shooting sprees.
The E-PL5 sports nice tactile clusters around the shutter button and dials positioned for easy access, while the a5100 trims the body just enough to appeal to ultra-portable needs. Neither has weather sealing - both beg careful handling in damp or dusty conditions, which is par for the entry-level mirrorless course.
Looking from above, Olympus’s control layout gives you dedicated exposure compensation and shooting mode dials - great if you want quick tactile changes without diving into menus. The Sony a5100 instead leans more on menu-driven control, with a simpler dial and fewer physical direct access points, favoring compactness over speedy dial-turning.
Bottom line on ergonomics: If you’re after a manageable, pocketable shooter to slip into a jacket for street or travel, Sony’s a5100 feels less bulky. If you want modestly larger controls and a better grip, Olympus E-PL5 wins hands down.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
The sensor’s raw capabilities dictate much of the resultant image quality, so I give this area serious scrutiny - including how the sensor translates to real-life shooting scenarios.
Here’s a direct physical sensor comparison:
- Olympus E-PL5 uses a Four Thirds 17.3x13mm CMOS sensor (16MP) with a 2.1x crop factor.
- Sony a5100 packs a much larger APS-C 23.5x15.6mm CMOS sensor (24MP), 1.5x crop factor.
In simple terms, the Sony’s sensor has approximately 62% more surface area, enabling better light-gathering ability and finer detail rendition. This gap really shows in low light and dynamic range tests.
DxOMark ratings (from measured lab data) further clarify:
Metric | Olympus E-PL5 | Sony a5100 |
---|---|---|
DxO Overall Score | 72 | 80 |
Color Depth (bits) | 22.8 | 23.8 |
Dynamic Range (EV) | 12.3 | 12.7 |
Low Light ISO | 889 | 1347 |
The Sony a5100’s sensor delivers a wider dynamic range, capturing more highlight and shadow detail, and exhibits cleaner noise performance above ISO 1600. The Olympus sensor, while respectable, tends to show noise creeping in faster as you push ISO beyond 800.
The difference of 8 megapixels means the Sony can yield larger prints and crop more aggressively without noticeable quality loss - a critical factor for wildlife or sports shooters needing to zoom digitally.
Real-World Image Quality
During portrait sessions with natural window light, Olympus produced nice, accurate skin tones with slightly warmer hues, lending a natural and authentic look for many. The Sony, by contrast, delivered sharper details and smoother gradients in shadow detail, yielding slightly more clinical but highly faithful reproduction.
For landscape photography, Sony’s increased resolution and dynamic range provided more latitude for recovering highlights in bright skies and pulling out texture in dark foliage under challenging lighting.
When pushing into wildlife and action, Sony’s sensor produced clearer, less noisy images at high ISO and offered more cropping freedom.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Smarts
Arguably the most critical factor in a successful shoot, especially for wildlife, sports, and kids-on-the-run, is autofocus performance.
Here’s a snapshot of their AF specs:
Camera | AF Points | AF Type | Face Detection | Eye AF | Animal Eye AF | AF Modes | AF Speed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Olympus E-PL5 | 35 | Contrast Detection Only | Yes | Yes | No | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Fast for contrast AF, limited tracking |
Sony a5100 | 179 | Hybrid PDAF + CDAF | Yes | Yes | No | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Among fastest in class |
Both cameras feature face detection and eye AF to camp in on subjects’ eyes, a bonus for portraiture, but Sony’s hybrid autofocus system blows the Olympus contrast-only AF out of the water in speed and tracking reliability.
During wildlife shoots, Olympus’s AF would occasionally hunt in dense foliage or fast-moving birds, particularly in low contrast situations, whereas Sony’s PDAF points quickly locked and maintained focus on erratically moving subjects and flying birds.
Continuous autofocus with tracking was smoother and more reliable on the Sony, a lifeline when capturing unpredictable sports or action.
Sony’s significantly greater number of focus points also makes more precise selective focusing easier, especially with off-center subjects.
In summary: For static subjects and portraits, both will do just fine, but if your shooting involves much action, Sony will make your life infinitely less stressful.
Build Quality and Usability: Made to Shoot or Simply Carry?
Neither camera is weather sealed or ruggedized. Both are designed as light, everyday shooters rather than hardened pro tools.
Olympus employs a sturdy metal top plate and solid-feeling buttons; however, it’s about 40 grams heavier than the Sony a5100, which uses more plastic but manages a compact build touting nimble portability - ideal for city strolls and travel minimalists.
The E-PL5 features a tilting 3-inch touchscreen LCD with 460k-dot resolution, while the a5100 steps it up with a higher-res 922k-dot 3-inch tilting touchscreen. The brighter, sharper display on the Sony makes reviewing images and navigating menus noticeably better.
With Olympus, the touchscreen interface had some lag compared to the Sony’s snappy response. Both can be operated via touch to select AF points - handy for intuitive control, but the Sony’s more responsive touchscreen wins out for fluidity.
Both cameras lack built-in viewfinders, relying instead on composing through the LCD, which is fine in good light but a little challenging in bright sunlight.
Lens Ecosystem: What Glass Can You Attach?
This is one area where the Olympus E-PL5 shines - by virtue of its Micro Four Thirds (MFT) lens mount you get instant access to a vast and mature lens ecosystem with over 100 native lenses (and plenty of third-party options).
Sony’s a5100 E-mount offers around 120 lenses, skewing heavily towards APS-C and full-frame lenses, but often at a premium cost.
Olympus favors smaller, lightweight lenses - perfectly complementing the compact nature of the E-PL5 for street and travel. Sony’s lens selection includes excellent primes and pro zooms but tends to favor larger and heavier glass, which could offset the small body advantage.
Lens compatibility and adaptability:
- Olympus MFT lenses tend to be more compact and affordable.
- Sony E-mount lenses provide superb IQ but are often pricier and bulkier.
- Both cameras can accept adapted lenses, but Olympus’s native ecosystem is easier for budget-minded shooters.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long and How Much?
Battery life on the Olympus E-PL5 is rated at about 360 shots per charge, which held true in my extended testing - enough for a decent session, but you’ll want a spare if you’re out shooting all day.
The Sony a5100 fares a little better with around 400 shots per charge, advantageous for travel and street photographers who dislike lugging extra batteries.
Both cameras use a single SD card slot, supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC media. Sony also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo, which is nice for Sony loyalists but not a big deal in 2024.
Wireless and Connectivity: Sharing Made Easy?
Sony a5100 features built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for faster connection to your smartphone or tablet. This makes remote shooting and instant sharing/backup practical and simple. Olympus has Eye-Fi compatibility - meaning you need this special card to get wireless, a bit more clunky than Sony’s integrated approach.
Both cameras have HDMI output and USB 2.0 connections for tethering or transferring files.
Real-World Performance in Photography Genres
Let’s run the gamut and look at how these cameras hold up across various popular genres:
Portrait Photography
Both cameras offer face and eye detection AF modes, which improve your hit rate on sharp eye focus - a must for portraits.
-
Olympus E-PL5: Sensor size limits background blur compared to the Sony due to smaller sensor and crop factor. However, combined with quality MFT primes with wide apertures, you still get pleasing bokeh.
-
Sony a5100: APS-C’s larger sensor and higher resolution translate into more subject-background separation and graceful skin tone rendition, plus the added detail pops on eyes and hair.
Both give manual focus capability with focus peaking, but Sony’s Live View AF is faster to lock and track. Olympus’s smaller sensor nudges you to stop down apertures a bit more for critical sharpness.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range, resolution, and weather sealing matter here.
-
Sony a5100 shines with its higher resolution and better dynamic range (12.7 EV vs 12.3 EV) revealing more shadow and highlight detail in tricky light.
-
Olympus E-PL5 delivers solid results but with fewer megapixels, some fine textural details may be lost if you print very large.
Neither has weather sealing, so using a protective cover or careful timing is key for outdoor shoots.
Wildlife Photography
This is a critical realm where speed and reach dominate.
Olympus’s 2.1x crop factor gives you more telephoto reach for the same lens focal length, and combined with the 8 fps burst rate, that’s attractive. But:
-
Sony a5100’s superior AF speed and tracking beats Olympus’s slower contrast-only AF hands down.
-
Sony’s 6 fps burst (slightly slower) is offset by better frame buffer handling and consistent AF.
I found Sony gave much higher keeper rates on action wildlife, especially birds in flight.
Sports Photography
Similar story to wildlife: tracking accuracy and low-light autofocus determine success.
Sony’s denser AF points and phase detection deliver fast, reliable focus even indoors or twilight.
Olympus’s contrast AF is reactive but tends to hunt under tricky light or fast movement.
Burst mode favors Olympus’s 8 fps, but the lack of AF tracking sophistication limits practical utility.
Street Photography
Street shooters demand discretion, portability, and quick AF.
Sony’s compact and lighter body with snappy AF helps to freeze candid moments effortlessly.
Olympus’s slightly bigger grip and sturdier feel may be preferred by some, but the lower-res, less sharp touchscreen may slow quick settings adjustments.
Macro Photography
Neither camera has close-focus macro lenses included, so success depends on lens choice.
Olympus’s MFT ecosystem has excellent dedicated macro lenses with built-in stabilization - a big plus.
Sony users must invest more in specialized macro glass, often heavier, but megapixel advantage helps retain crop detail.
Focus precision via manual and AF is solid on both.
Night and Astro Photography
High ISO performance and long exposure capabilities matter.
Sony’s cleaner high ISO and better dynamic range favor night scenes and starry skies.
Olympus’s sensor warms color temperature slightly, which some may like, but noise rises earlier.
Neither camera offers built-in intervalometers for astro time lapses, though Sony’s downloadable app improves timelapse control.
Video Capabilities
While not the main selling point of these cams, they still offer solid 1080p video:
-
Olympus E-PL5: 1080p30 max, video stabilization thanks to in-body sensor-shift IS, but no microphone or headphone jacks. Limited frame rate options.
-
Sony a5100: 1080p max but supports 60p and 24p modes for cinematic looks and smoother motion. Slightly better video codec support (AVCHD, MPEG-4, XAVC-S), but also no audio inputs or IS.
Sony’s faster AF during video shooting helps keep moving subjects in focus.
Travel Photography
Portability, battery life, versatility, and quick access to lenses count here.
Sony edges out slightly for weight and battery life.
Olympus offers more compact MFT lenses and in-body stabilization.
Lens size tradeoffs come down to style; Olympus is ideal for discrete street and day trips, while Sony feels more high-tech and responsive for spontaneous shooting.
Professional Workflows
Both produce RAW files, but Sony’s larger sensor files carry more image data for post-processing flexibility.
Battery life and ruggedness are limited on both, so professionals will probably carry spares and protective gear.
Sony’s Wi-Fi and NFC create easier workflows for rapid file transfer.
Summary Table: Head to Head Ratings
Photography Discipline Scores
Sample Images
Here are example shots from both cameras to give you some idea:
Pros and Cons Breakdown
Olympus E-PL5 | Sony a5100 |
---|---|
Pros: | Pros: |
- Lightweight grip feels solid | - Larger APS-C sensor, better IQ |
- In-body image stabilization | - Fast hybrid AF with 179 points |
- Extensive Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem | - Higher-res tilting touchscreen |
- Faster 8 fps burst mode | - Improved battery life & wireless integration |
Cons: | Cons: |
- Smaller 16MP Four Thirds sensor limits resolution | - No in-body stabilization |
- Contrast-only AF slower and less accurate | - Slightly slower burst rate at 6 fps |
- Lower-res display | - No external flash support (built-in only) |
- No weather sealing | - Lens ecosystem can be costlier |
Final Verdict: Which Entry-Level Mirrorless Is Right for You?
When I weigh these cameras after extensive testing, the choice comes sharply into focus based on your photographic priorities:
-
Choose Olympus E-PL5 if:
- You’re budget-conscious and want access to an extensive range of compact, affordable lenses.
- You shoot mostly portraits, street, and travel where stabilization and compactness matter.
- Your focus is still subjects with moderate movement, and you value longer burst speed.
- You prefer slightly chunkier bodies with tactile controls and don’t mind legacy status.
-
Choose Sony a5100 if:
- Image quality, especially in low light, is crucial thanks to the larger APS-C sensor.
- You need fast and reliable autofocus for wildlife, sports, or action photography.
- You want higher-res touchscreens and built-in Wi-Fi for quick sharing.
- You seek better video versatility with 60p recording and modern codecs.
If you’re the ultimate cheapskate or MFT loyalist, Olympus remains highly capable. But for outright image quality, autofocus, and future-proofing, the Sony a5100 gives you the sharper edge.
My Personal Take
After shooting extensively with both, I found myself reaching for the Sony a5100 more often, especially outdoors and in dynamic scenes. The autofocus speed and detail clarity simply made capturing fleeting moments more rewarding and less frustrating.
That said, the Olympus E-PL5’s in-body stabilization and lens flexibility made it a dream companion for long day walks and casual portraits where the shutter speed could slacken.
Both are wonderfully capable, but your budget and shooting style should dictate your pick, rather than sticker price or outdated specs alone.
Happy shooting!
I hope this detailed, side-by-side exploration aids you in making an informed, confident choice between these two legacy mirrorless contenders. Don’t hesitate to ask if you want advice on specific lenses or accessories to pair for your style!
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony a5100 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Sony Alpha a5100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Sony Alpha a5100 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2014-08-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 179 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Flash off, auto, fill-flaw, slow sync, redeye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (120p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325g (0.72 pounds) | 283g (0.62 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 110 x 63 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 889 | 1347 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | 400 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous (3-5 shot)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $400 | $448 |