Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b251/5b251bf8127050113ed9df295706e333234efade" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL6 front Olympus PEN E-PL6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced August 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-PL6 versus Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-PL6 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PL6 was manufactured 5 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-PL6 scores vs the SP-565UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL6 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 68 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-PL6
SP-565UZ | E-PL6 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL6 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL6 comes with exterior dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL6 versus Olympus SP-565UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL6 versus the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08e25/08e2549fef7d772e2f61ebc080dece6910a895ee" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL6 and SP-565UZ is 88 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7097b/7097bc33c6bb327e8ad09fc46453831132f74cd0" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL6 and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL6 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL6 will offer you more detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-PL6 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d211/0d2110e197e85409c4d47c5642015a5fe607c0d9" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36c3d/36c3ddc721b294559e69291808c5171851b223c6" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-08-01 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325g (0.72 lb) | 413g (0.91 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $400 |