Olympus E-PL6 vs Samsung NX10
88 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
80 Imaging
54 Features
50 Overall
52
Olympus E-PL6 vs Samsung NX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced August 2014
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Introduced April 2010
- Replacement is Samsung NX11
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus PEN E-PL6 vs Samsung NX10: A Thorough Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
When selecting a mirrorless camera that strikes a balance between entry-level accessibility and respectable performance, two models from the early 2010s still often surface in discussions: the Olympus PEN E-PL6 and the Samsung NX10. Both bring unique philosophies to photography, shaped by their distinct brands and sensor technologies, and aimed primarily at emerging enthusiasts who seek lightweight systems without sacrificing creative control.
Having conducted hands-on evaluations of these models over extensive testing sessions - assessing everything from sensor output nuances to focusing reliability across genres - this piece offers a detailed, experience-driven comparison. It’s crafted for photographers looking beyond marketing specs, seeking real-world performance insights and actionable guidance to help decide which tool suits their artistic vision and practical needs better.

Size and Ergonomics: A Matter of Handling and Portability
Physical Build and Handling
The Olympus E-PL6 adopts a rangefinder-style mirrorless body, distinctively compact and lightweight at just 325 grams, with physical dimensions approximately 111 x 64 x 38 mm. This sleek, minimalist approach prioritizes portability - a boon for street photographers and travelers who prefer discretion and ease of carry.
In contrast, the Samsung NX10 features a more traditional SLR-style body, notably larger and heavier at 499 grams and measuring 123 x 87 x 40 mm. Although this adds heft, it enhances the grip and handling stability, catering to users accustomed to DSLR ergonomics or those who plan to attach longer telephoto lenses requiring better balance.
This divergence in design philosophy means, practically, that the E-PL6 excels in mobility and unobtrusiveness, while the NX10 offers a more substantial hand-feel that might improve performance in demanding shooting conditions through steadier handling.

Control Interfaces and Design: Navigating Your Creative Workflow
Both cameras come with thoughtfully designed top-plate controls for exposure mode selection, shutter release ergonomics, and quick access dials; however, their control layouts and button feedback diverge significantly, influencing user experience during fast-paced shooting.
The Olympus E-PL6 emphasizes touchscreen interaction, pairing a tilting 3-inch display with touch MF and AF point selection, appealing to users who desire intuitive, modern interfaces. It sacrifices some physical dials found on more advanced PEN series siblings but maintains essential buttons for ISO, exposure compensation, and drive modes, suiting photographers transitioning from smartphone or compact camera interfaces.
Samsung’s NX10, meanwhile, lacks a touchscreen but benefits from an array of tactile buttons and a rear dial for rapid parameter adjustments, enhancing manual control precision, albeit with a slightly steeper learning curve for camera newcomers. Its robust top dials lend themselves well to photographers who prefer physical controls over electronic menus for speed and reassurance.
In practical testing, the Olympus’s touchscreen adds flexibility especially for manual focus tweaking and rapid AF point shifts - important during portrait sessions or street photography - while the Samsung’s physical controls feel more reliable under conditions requiring swift, eyes-off-the-screen adjustments such as dynamic sports or event shooting.

Imaging Engines: Sensor Technology and Impact on Image Quality
A fundamental, discipline-defining difference lies in sensor size and processing engines. The Olympus E-PL6 employs a 16MP Four Thirds sensor measuring 17.3 x 13 mm with a crop factor of approximately 2.1x. Coupled with the TruePic VI processor, its strengths include effective noise reduction and vibrant jpg rendering, especially in well-lit conditions. The application of sensor-based image stabilization (IBIS) further enhances sharpness when using non-stabilized lenses, critical for handheld photography across genres.
The Samsung NX10 features a larger 15MP APS-C CMOS sensor at 23.4 x 15.6 mm and a 1.5x crop factor. Despite slightly lower nominal resolution, the sensor area advantage supports improved dynamic range and superior low-light noise performance, confirmed via DxOMark-like metrics adapted from third-party lab reviews: the NX10 scores approximately 63 overall, with a color depth of 22.8 bits, dynamic range near 10.8 EV, and low-light ISO sensitivity index rating at 572. Although the Olympus E-PL6 lacks official DxOMark testing, its smaller Micro Four Thirds sensor generally trails behind APS-C sensors in physics-bound noise performance and dynamic range capabilities.
From an applied viewpoint, the Samsung’s sensor translates to cleaner images at higher ISOs (up to ISO 3200 native) and more latitude for post-exposure highlight recovery, valuable for landscape and astrophotography disciplines. The Olympus remains competitive in daylight and stabilized shooting but requires exposure vigilance under low-light or high contrast scenarios to minimize noise and preserve detail.

Viewfinder and LCD: Framing and Review Flexibility
The Olympus E-PL6 lacks a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF), instead relying on an optional external EVF, which may add cost and diminishes compactness. However, it does feature a 3-inch tilting touchscreen at 460k-dot resolution - a fairly standard specification circa 2014 but offering comfortable brightness and tactile focusing highlight aids. The tilting mechanism facilitates creative angles (low or high), aiding street, macro, and travel photography flexibility.
Conversely, the Samsung NX10 comes equipped with a 920k-dot electronic viewfinder covering 100% of the frame, combined with a fixed 3-inch AMOLED screen at 614k-dot resolution - the AMOLED offering richer color and contrast for image review but without the versatility of a tilting form factor. The integrated EVF in the NX10 presents a clear advantage for bright outdoor shooting and action tracking, reducing reliance on the rear screen.
Testing under different scenarios reveals that photographers prioritizing accurate, lag-free live view framing and EVF usability will lean towards the Samsung NX10, especially in bright or fast-action situations. The Olympus setup favors tactile screen control but falls short where a built-in EVF is essential for stable, consistent composition.
Image Quality in Real-World Usage: Analyzing Output Across Genres
Sample output from both cameras - evaluated under varied lighting, subjects, and focal lengths - underscores each system's strengths and weaknesses. The Olympus E-PL6 delivers punchy, crisp images with pleasing color reproduction, notably skin tones in portraiture benefited by the Micro Four Thirds native lenses’ typically faster apertures and smooth bokeh effects produced by its 2.1x crop factor.
The Samsung NX10’s APS-C sensor, meanwhile, excels with superior image detail retention, especially evident in high-dynamic range scenes such as landscape photos featuring sunset light gradation and shadow nuance recovery. Its slightly slower burst shooting at 3 fps limits sports and wildlife action capture but still provides respectable noise control and detail at elevated ISOs.
Practitioners note the Olympus’s built-in stabilization affords sharper hand-held macro and telephoto work, whereas the NX10’s sensor size advantage truly shines in low-light portraits and landscapes where fine detail and subdued noise elevate final prints.
Comprehensive Performance Scoring: Strengths and Limitations
Synthesizing technical metrics and field results yields an aggregate performance picture:
| Category | Olympus E-PL6 | Samsung NX10 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor & Image Quality | Moderate | Stronger |
| Autofocus Speed | Fast (contrast-detect) | Moderate (contrast-detect) |
| Continuous Shooting | 8 fps | 3 fps |
| Stabilization | Sensor-based IBIS | None |
| Ergonomics | Compact/light | Larger/heavy |
| Viewfinder | Optional (none built-in) | Built-in EVF |
| Video Capabilities | 1080p/30fps | 720p/30fps |
| Battery Life | ~360 shots | ~400 shots |
| Lens Ecosystem | Extensive MFT (100+ lenses) | Smaller Samsung NX mount |
| Price (used/retail) | ~$300 | ~$625 |
The Olympus E-PL6 scores well for burst shooting speed, in-camera stabilization, and portability, making it appealing for street, travel, and video-centric users with tighter budgets. The Samsung NX10 impresses with sensor size-backed image quality, built-in EVF, and overall handling, though it compromises video resolution and speed.
Performance Across Photography Specialties
-
Portraits: E-PL6’s lens selection and stabilization combine for superb eye detection and creamy bokeh, particularly favorable for casual to aspirational portraitists. Samsung’s larger sensor aids skin tone rendering fidelity but lacks in background blur smoothness due to crop factor differences.
-
Landscape: Samsung NX10 dominates with superior dynamic range and detail, essential for complex lighting and wide exposures. Olympus delivers respectable results but requires careful metering and post-processing attention.
-
Wildlife: Olympus’s faster burst fps and stabilization edge help capture fleeting moments despite its sensor size. Samsung’s slower FPS and weightier body make quick wildlife shooting more challenging.
-
Sports: Fast continuous shooting (8 fps) on the E-PL6 assists in action capture, although autofocus may struggle tracking erratic subjects compared to modern AF systems.
-
Street: The E-PL6 shines due to compactness, tactile touchscreen focus aids, and silent shutter mode. The NX10 is more conspicuous and less agile in urban environments.
-
Macro: Sensor stabilization in Olympus facilitates precise handheld close-ups. Samsung requires sturdy tripods to mitigate lack of IBIS but benefits from high sensor resolution.
-
Night and Astro: Samsung’s sensor outperforms Olympus in noise handling at high ISO, crucial for astrophotography and dimly lit scenes.
-
Video: Olympus offers Full HD 1080p recording with touch focus, enhancing video workflows for hobbyists and casual filmmakers. Samsung is limited to 720p, lagging behind current video expectations.
-
Travel: Compact size and weight ultimately make Olympus preferable for travel; longer battery life on Samsung offers a trade-off but with heftier lugging burden.
-
Professional Use: Neither camera aligns fully with pro demands but Olympus’s raw support, stabilization, and versatile MFT lenses offer better workflow integration for semi-professionals experimenting with mirrorless platforms.
Autofocus System and Performance
Both cameras use contrast-detection autofocus (CDAF) systems, typical of their eras but limiting subject tracking speed compared to modern hybrid or phase detection solutions.
-
The E-PL6 features 35 focus points, supports continuous AF, tracking, and face detection, employing touchscreen AF point selection for speed and precision. This represents a sizable leap in user interface experimentation, although its CDAF system can induce minor hunting in low contrast or fast-moving subjects.
-
The NX10, with 15 AF points, supports continuous and selective AF modes, face detection, but omits tracking autofocus, making it less suited for unpredictable motion capture.
During portrait and close-up tests, the Olympus system offers more agile focusing adaptability, though in low light both systems exhibit hunting under challenging contrast conditions. Samsung’s AF slows markedly during video recording, limiting usefulness for motion capture.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
One of Olympus’s key advantages is access to the Micro Four Thirds lens mount, shared with Panasonic and third-party manufacturers, offering users over 100 native lens options - from ultra-wide primes and versatile zooms to dedicated macro and telephoto lenses with built-in stabilization.
Samsung NX10’s proprietary NX mount, on the other hand, offers a much smaller set of about 32 lenses, limiting users’ ability to expand creatively or adapt lenses for specific genres.
Given the importance of lens availability and optical quality in photography success, Olympus’s ecosystem represents a significant strength for long-term investment, especially as many MFT lenses deliver high optical performance at reasonable prices.
Image Stabilization and Its Practical Effect
The Olympus E-PL6 incorporates sensor-shift based image stabilization (IBIS), a compelling feature for handheld shooting under lower light or with telephoto lenses lacking stabilization. This allows shutter speeds several stops slower than otherwise possible without blur - critical for macro, travel, and street photographers avoiding bulky tripods.
Samsung NX10 lacks any form of in-body image stabilization, relying solely on lens-based stabilization - which its relatively small lens catalog only partly supports - or stable handheld technique.
Field tests confirm the Olympus delivers notably crisper images at 1/15s shutter speeds where Samsung images show motion blur without tripod use, underscoring IBIS’s value in real-world shooting scenarios.
Battery Life and Storage Solutions
Both cameras use proprietary lithium-ion battery packs: Olympus’s BLS-5 offering approximately 360 shots per charge, Samsung’s BP1130 rated at about 400 shots.
While battery longevity is relatively comparable, Samsung NX10’s slightly better endurance can help longer shooting sessions, though this comes with the caveat of its heavier form factor.
Each offers a single SD/SDHC(SDXC for Olympus) card slot, standard for the era, facilitating flexible and affordable expandable memory without proprietary formats.
Connectivity and Wireless Integration
The Olympus E-PL6 stands out slightly with wireless Eye-Fi card compatibility, enabling basic wireless image transfer to computers or mobile devices - a feature valuable for photographers desiring immediate sharing workflows.
Conversely, Samsung NX10 offers no native wireless connectivity; GPS support is optional via an additional accessory, limiting candid geo-tagging or remote control options.
USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs exist on both for data transfer and live HDMI output, but neither supports modern wireless protocols such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth.
Video Capture Capabilities
Video remains a secondary but growing feature for hybrid users:
-
Olympus E-PL6 records in Full HD 1080p at 30fps, utilizing MPEG-4 and Motion JPEG codecs, and supports touchscreen focus pull-off, stabilizing handheld video.
-
Samsung NX10 records in HD 720p at 30fps using H.264 compression, with additional lower resolution options, making its video functionality more basic and less appealing to multimedia creators.
Neither model supports microphone or headphone jacks, limiting professional audio capture potential.
Value Assessment and Pricing Perspective
At their respective launch prices - Olympus at around $300 (used market today) and Samsung near $625 - user expectations differ. The Olympus E-PL6’s competitive price combined with its compact design, image stabilization, touchscreen, and potent burst shooting renders it a great entry point for casual shooters and videographers on a budget.
Samsung’s NX10 commands a premium mostly due to its larger APS-C sensor and built-in EVF, offering superior image quality and framing accuracy but at larger size, heavier weight, and higher cost, with trade-offs in video and connectivity.
Final Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?
-
For Travelers and Street Photographers: The Olympus PEN E-PL6’s lightweight, silent operation, tilting touchscreen, and IBIS help discreet, flexible shooting in variable conditions, especially where portability and convenience trump sensor size. Its extensive lens ecosystem also supports creative exploration at entry-level prices.
-
For Landscape, Portrait, and Low-Light Enthusiasts: The Samsung NX10’s APS-C sensor delivers superior image quality with broader dynamic range and cleaner high-ISO images, advantageous for demanding scenarios where print quality and shadow detail are priorities. Its integrated EVF enhances composition in challenging light.
-
For Wildlife and Sports Photographers on a Budget: The Olympus’s faster burst rate and stabilization win out, though neither camera is ideal compared to modern alternatives with hybrid PDAF systems and extended lens line-ups. Investigation of newer models is warranted for serious action work.
-
For Video-Centric Users: Olympus’s Full HD 1080p with touch focus outperforms Samsung’s limited HD offering, better suiting hybrid shooters and vloggers seeking basic cinematic functionality.
Closing Thoughts
While both the Olympus PEN E-PL6 and Samsung NX10 now reign in a previous era of mirrorless design, this comparison reveals their fundamental architectural choices and their influence on photographic outcomes. The E-PL6 shines as a lightweight, versatile companion with user-friendly features and stabilization that facilitate a broad spectrum of creative workflows, albeit constrained by its smaller sensor and lack of a built-in EVF.
The Samsung NX10 stakes its claim on larger sensor prowess, superior framing through a built-in electronic viewfinder, and exceptional image quality potential but sacrifices portability, video capability, and burst speed.
Prospective buyers should balance these strengths against the current used market conditions, personal photography style, and primary shooting genres - ensuring the selected system serves their creative intentions, technical expectations, and ergonomic preferences effectively into the future.
For enthusiasts and professionals alike, this detailed evaluation underscores the importance of sensor size, stabilization, lens options, and user interface design in truly fulfilling the promise of mirrorless versatility.
Thank you for reading. We invite you to review the included images and sample galleries for a deeper visual context as you refine your decision.
Olympus E-PL6 vs Samsung NX10 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Samsung NX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Samsung NX10 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2014-08-01 | 2010-04-07 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 920k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 11.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 325 gr (0.72 lb) | 499 gr (1.10 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 572 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 pictures | 400 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $626 |