Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb52/1cb52a0c40114d28dcc51a80a6a5ed47ea5f756b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FX700, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the FX700 (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FX700 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PL9 was unveiled 7 years later than the FX700 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX700 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-PL9 grades vs the FX700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic FX700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FX700
E-PL9 | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 92 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Olympus E-PL9
FX700 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FX700
E-PL9 | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL9 comes with outside measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Panasonic FX700 has proportions of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FX700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the FX700.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81cc1/81cc18167d9ab9f74efe4c34ee2d8c54841bf5ec" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and FX700 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef738/ef73880231072aa645a236648906a9295f5b6d50" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and FX700.
Clearly, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer you extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher E-PL9 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a98c1/a98c1e5c12d1b9737ace60d0dc913c7e4c398c07" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/899c2/899c2ed73072c30554b88f92a98ef714db916cf3" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 7.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lb) | 176g (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $599 | $399 |