Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57da5/57da55bc092010e6c2734595d664451750b4424f" alt="Sigma sd Quattro front Sigma sd Quattro front"
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-PL9 and Sigma Quattro, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PL9 was released 24 months after the Quattro making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-PL9 grades against the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sigma Quattro
E-PL9 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | February 2016 | More modern by 24 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus E-PL9
Quattro | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 1040k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sigma Quattro
E-PL9 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys external dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL9 and Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL9 and the Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1aab6/1aab6c0cab917644b6a510b501728e80b6164717" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and Quattro is 85 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2ac9/a2ac962c483b07f7cdb671c7b4c943ed9267fd9b" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and Quattro.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL9 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro will render more detail as a result of its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/160b1/160b18928b71a7792d41fc4b1fc975332aec4a4f" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da60/1da60c8f7b0b000667125f0786f1c503ee897fec" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 29MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Total lenses | 107 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 pounds) | 625g (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $738 |