Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67164/67164dd2c0a4166f60840c2f5aeb5d3444f381e6" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
55 Overall
44
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 192g - 103 x 62 x 28mm
- Launched November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and LF1 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and LF1 (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PM2 was released 6 months before the LF1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic LF1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-PM2 scores versus the LF1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Panasonic LF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic LF1
E-PM2 | LF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic LF1 over the Olympus E-PM2
LF1 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic LF1
E-PM2 | LF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | ![]() | November 2013 | Same generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 comes with outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Panasonic LF1 has measurements of 103mm x 62mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 versus the LF1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8fc2/e8fc2537ceede2a7eaf23a76d33f491d7f269612" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and LF1 is 89 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ff5d/0ff5d1c0939ab00af6d26fa5f09db4c354469d6d" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and LF1.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5094c/5094ceed2dde6985bf638a416c161d5b49ab7e31" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da9e5/da9e58437d484139abc26fb2c38d5dec675c6e59" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic LF1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2013-11-26 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 7.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) | 192 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 103 x 62 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | 11.6 |
DXO Low light score | 932 | 211 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | 250 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $448 | $500 |