Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63bd5/63bd549202ff236b9bc86cddba608e6a029457e0" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is very similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PM2 was released 22 months later than the WG-1 GPS making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-PM2 scores versus the WG-1 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-PM2 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | ![]() | August 2011 | Fresher by 22 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus E-PM2
WG-1 GPS | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-PM2 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 offers physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 GPS has measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the WG-1 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40236/402365ccad9d81f081b8f3e80d4d9ba4d93d2405" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and WG-1 GPS is 89 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50606/50606207bc5ae35ae1947af2a0332b64d84f4a84" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The graphic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and WG-1 GPS.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The fresher E-PM2 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b85/40b854e8e1db677ce04d694c20014c99c984104f" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90a4c/90a4c0c0dc1b448fa07020d6e93ec6ba6a132ab5" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 260 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $448 | $350 |