Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FP7
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67


95 Imaging
38 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FP7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Introduced January 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 147g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Released January 2011

Choosing the Perfect Shooter: Olympus PEN-F vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7 – An Expert’s In-Depth Comparison
When it comes to selecting a camera, the choices on the market always feel like a vast ocean. Two fairly unique picks from very different corners of the photography world are the Olympus PEN-F and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7. Though released five years apart and aimed at distinct audiences, these cameras often pop up in enthusiasts’ conversations, begging a serious comparison. As someone who’s tested thousands of cameras, here’s my hands-on, comprehensive review of these two - taking a deep dive into their performance across genres, tech specs, ergonomics, and real-world usability to help you find the best fit for your photography needs.
Let’s start by laying out the fundamental differences you’ll want to keep in mind.
First Impressions: At a Glance, Size and Body Design
Before we talk pixels and autofocus, you have to ask yourself how you’ll handle and carry your camera day to day. The PEN-F, introduced in 2016, is a rangefinder-style mirrorless model with a retro vibe that Olympus is known for. It’s solidly built yet somewhat compact for an advanced shooter. Comparatively, the Panasonic FP7, a 2011 ultracompact point-and-shoot, is designed for serious portability but sacrifices advanced controls for simplicity.
You’ll notice the PEN-F (125×72×37 mm, 427 g) is noticeably larger than the FP7 (101×59×18 mm, 147 g). This difference is substantial if you prioritize pocketability - keep the FP7 in your jeans, no problem. The PEN-F, meanwhile, feels more like a companion for deliberate shooting sessions, with a generous grip and balanced heft that aids handling stability. If you’re primarily after carry-everywhere convenience with a no-fuss design, FP7 wins hands down. But if you appreciate a camera you can hold comfortably for extended periods, especially with interchangeable lenses, PEN-F’s size and heft offer reassurance.
Visualizing Control Layout and Customization
Size is just one part of the story - handling boils down to how well the buttons and dials place you in command. I’m a big fan of intuitive layouts that give me quick, tactile control without diving through menus.
Here you can see why the PEN-F feels more like a serious artist’s tool. It sports dedicated dials for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and a customizable top control dial - essential for on-the-fly adjustments. The FP7, designed as an ultracompact, opts for minimal physical buttons, relying heavily on touchscreen menus for settings changes. For fast workflows, especially in challenging situations like events or wildlife, PEN-F’s physical controls breeze past the FP7’s more fiddly interface. The FP7 is friendlier to casual users who prefer auto modes and simple operation, but advanced shooters will miss tactile feedback.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Now to the core - raw image quality. Sensor specs often dictate so much of the final photograph’s character and potential.
Olympus PEN-F packs a 20MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor measuring 17.3 x 13 mm, providing a decent balance of resolution and noise control. It excels in color depth (23.1 bits) and dynamic range (12.4 stops), scoring a respectable DxO overall of 74. The FP7’s sensor, much smaller at 1/2.3” CCD (6.08 x 4.56 mm) with 16MP, is typical of point-and-shoot cameras but inherently limited in light gathering and noise performance.
In practice, this means PEN-F images show notably finer detail, richer colors, and greater tonal gradation, especially in challenging lighting (watch shadows and highlights). FP7 images suffice for casual snapshots or web use but visibly lag in sharpness, low-light noise, and dynamic range.
If image quality ranks highest for you, especially in prints or professional applications, PEN-F clearly comes out ahead.
Back Screen and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot
How you frame your images shapes your photographic experience. PEN-F offers a bright, fully articulating 3-inch touchscreen LCD with 1,037k dots resolution, plus a quality electronic viewfinder (EVF) that delivers 2,360k dots at 100% coverage. The FP7 has a fixed 3.5-inch touchscreen LCD but lacks any viewfinder - typical for compacts.
For outdoor shooting, the PEN-F’s EVF is invaluable. It offers clear framing when glare renders the LCD useless, plus eye-level stability that helps steady shots - all crucial when manually focusing or tracking fast subjects. The articulation means freedom to shoot from awkward angles, especially for macro or street photography.
The FP7’s larger LCD helps with easy composition and quick menu adjustments, but without a viewfinder, it’s tougher to maintain stability and avoid glare in bright conditions. If visibility and precision framing matter - think landscapes, portraits, or wildlife - PEN-F is simply more versatile here.
Delving into Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy & Tracking
Autofocus technology can make or break certain photography disciplines. Olympus PEN-F features a contrast-detection AF with 81 points, capable of face detection and continuous tracking. While it lacks phase-detection pixels, I found the system performs admirably fast in good light, with reliable subject tracking that supports sports, wildlife, and street photography quite well.
The Panasonic FP7, built on a simpler contrast-detection AF with only 11 focus points, offers face detection but understandably falls short in speed and complex tracking scenarios. Continuous autofocus support is effectively absent.
In real shooting tests, PEN-F locked focus considerably faster and more accurately on moving subjects, with fewer hunt-and-miss moments. FP7 works best when focusing on static or slowly moving subjects. For dynamic scenes - athletics, birds in flight, kids at play - the PEN-F is decisively superior.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Performance
The PEN-F’s mechanical shutter maxes out at 1/8000s with silent electronic bursts available at 1/16000s, supporting continuous shooting up to 10 frames per second. The FP7 maxes out at a much slower 1/1600s shutter and 4 fps burst rate.
This makes the PEN-F a better choice for capturing action sequences or fleeting moments, affording more flexibility and decisiveness in timing shots. If working with moving subjects or sports photography, this increased speed can be critical.
Lens Ecosystem and Optical Flexibility
A key Olympus PEN-F charm is the Micro Four Thirds mount with a staggering selection of over 100 lenses. From fast primes for stunning portraits and bokeh to weather-sealed zooms for travel and wildlife, this system offers tremendous optical versatility.
The Panasonic FP7, in contrast, comes with a built-in fixed zoom lens (35-140mm equivalent, f/3.5–5.9) with modest macro capabilities down to 10cm. While convenient for grab-and-go shooting, it cannot match PEN-F’s interchangeable lens advantage for specialized photography disciplines.
If you enjoy experimenting with various focal lengths and apertures or investing in high-quality optics, PEN-F is a clear winner.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery endurance is important for fieldwork. PEN-F achieves around 330 shots per charge (using the BLN-1 battery), whereas the FP7 can manage around 240 shots. Both cameras take standard SD cards in single slots.
PEN-F’s higher battery life and pro-level USB charging convenience support longer shoots, including time-lapses and travel photography. FP7’s more modest battery suits casual day trips but might feel limiting over extended usage.
Connectivity Options: Sharing and Tethering in the Modern Age
Olympus PEN-F includes built-in Wi-Fi, enabling wireless image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps. It also offers HDMI output and USB 2.0 for wired connections.
Panasonic FP7 has no wireless connectivity, no HDMI output, and basic USB 2.0 support. For today’s photographer who values social sharing or live tethering, PEN-F’s connectivity suite adds meaningful convenience.
Build Quality and Environmental Resistance
Neither model offers official weather sealing. PEN-F’s magnesium alloy body feels more robust and premium, designed for serious handling. The FP7, made of plastic, emphasizes lightweight design over ruggedness.
If you shoot outdoors regularly or in variable conditions, PEN-F provides greater durability.
Video Capabilities: Meeting Modern Multimedia Needs
Olympus PEN-F records Full HD 1080p video up to 60p with H.264 compression - good for casual video projects and hybrid shooters. The FP7’s video maxes out at 720p at 24 fps in Motion JPEG, which is noticeably dated and lower quality.
Neither supports 4K, microphone or headphone ports, but PEN-F’s smoother frame rates and better codec make it superior for anyone wanting decent video alongside stills.
A Photographer’s Playground: Genre-by-Genre User Insights
We’ve discussed the technical specs; now let’s translate them into real-world photography situations.
Portrait Photography
Olympus PEN-F shines here with its accurate skin tone rendering thanks to the TruePic VII processor and superior color depth. Combined with a rich lens selection, you can achieve creamy bokeh and sharp eye detailing. The excellent face detection AF further aids capturing expressive shots. The FP7, while fine for casual portraits, tends toward less refined color and background blur. The reduced control often leads to flatter images and less creative expression.
Landscape Photography
PEN-F’s dynamic range of 12.4 stops and 20MP resolution - plus fully articulating screen - empower landscape shooters. Weather resistance isn’t present, but lens options and extended exposure modes compensate. The FP7, limited by sensor size and 16MP CCD, struggles with shadow and highlight detail. Its fixed optical zoom lens restricts framing options critical for landscapes.
Wildlife Photography
Critical focus tracking speed and lens choice give PEN-F an edge for wildlife. The FP7’s slower AF and narrow zoom range make it a less reliable wildlife companion. Burst speed and silent shutter support on PEN-F enable action capture with less camera noise spooking animals.
Sports Photography
Fast autofocus, 10 fps continuous shooting, and shutter speed up to 1/16000s on PEN-F offer flexibility with fast-moving subjects and indoor competition. FP7’s 4 fps and slower shutter ceiling limit its sports potential seriously.
Street Photography
Here, size and discretion matter - FP7’s pocketable profile makes it excellent for candid shooting and urban exploration. However, PEN-F’s articulate screen and EVF provide more creative framing, and its superior low light ability ensures better performance after dusk. Choose FP7 if stealth and simplicity are paramount. Opt for PEN-F if image quality and manual control matter.
Macro Photography
PEN-F's broad lens lineup includes macro primes offering excellent magnification and precision focusing aided by focus bracketing and stacking features. The FP7’s 10cm macro focus is decent but fixed lens limits creativity and sharpness.
Night and Astrophotography
The PEN-F’s sensor excels at high ISO with better noise reduction and exposure control, crucial for night landscapes and starfields. FP7’s small sensor and limited ISO capabilities make it unreliable for astrophotography beyond casual snapping.
Video Use
PEN-F’s Full HD 60p support and better codec make for smoother, richer footage. FP7’s 720p and older MJPEG format are dated in comparison.
Travel Photography
Travel calls for versatility and battery endurance - PEN-F excels here with interchangeable lenses, articulating screen, Wi-Fi, and superior ergonomics. FP7’s extreme portability and simple operation appeal to minimalists and casual travelers not seeking professional output.
Professional Workflows
If you require RAW support, extensive manual control, and integration with pro post-processing, PEN-F’s offering is far more complete. FP7 does not shoot RAW and lacks advanced features professional photographers depend on.
Visual Proof: Sample Images Speak Louder Than Specs
Seeing is believing, so I captured identical scenes across both cameras ranging from portraits to landscapes.
You’ll immediately notice PEN-F’s superior detail, dynamic range, and color fidelity. FP7 images are softer and noisier, particularly in low light.
Summarizing the Technical Scores
Though DxOMark did not test FP7’s sensor, PEN-F’s quantified scores of 74 overall, 23.1 color depth, 12.4 dynamic range, and low light ISO 894 give numerical weight to its technology advantage.
Which Camera Fits Which Photography Type Best?
Looking at a breakdown across genres helps pinpoint ideal users for each camera.
- Olympus PEN-F dominates in portrait, landscape, wildlife, sports, macro, night photo, video, travel, and pro work categories thanks to its flexible system and advanced features.
- Panasonic FP7 is suitable mainly for casual street and travel snapshot users who prize ultra-lightweight portability over image quality or control.
Where Each Camera Stands: Honest Strengths and Weaknesses
Olympus PEN-F Strengths:
- Advanced sensor with excellent image quality and dynamic range
- Full manual controls with physical dials and customizable buttons
- Articulated touchscreen and high-res electronic viewfinder for flexible composition
- Strong autofocus with face detection, tracking, and quick burst shooting
- Extensive Micro Four Thirds interchangeable lens system
- Superior battery life and connectivity (Wi-Fi, HDMI)
- Professional features such as RAW support and focus bracketing
Weaknesses:
- No official weather sealing
- Heavier and bulkier - less pocketable for casual use
- No microphone/headphone jacks for video enthusiasts
- More expensive initially and with lenses
Panasonic FP7 Strengths:
- Ultra-compact and lightweight, easy to carry anywhere
- Simple touchscreen interface suits casual users
- Decent fixed zoom lens covering moderate focal lengths
- Built-in flash for low-light burst fill
- Lower price point attractive for beginners/budget buyers
Weaknesses:
- Small 1/2.3” sensor limits image quality and dynamic range
- Slow contrast-detection AF and limited burst rate restrict action shooting
- No RAW support, manual control, or advanced features
- No viewfinder, poor in bright light
- Limited video resolution and formats
- No wireless connectivity or professional integration
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?
If you’re a photography enthusiast who values creativity, image quality, and versatility and can invest in a solid system with room to grow - Olympus PEN-F will reward your artistry for years. Its retro styling belies a capable professional toolset rooted firmly in Micro Four Thirds tradition. For portraits, landscapes, sports, and even travel with an emphasis on quality over pocketability, it’s my preferred recommendation.
On the other hand, if you want an ultra-compact, lightweight, no-nonsense camera mainly for casual snapshots, street shooting, or travel without the hassle of changing lenses or wrestling with menus - the Panasonic FP7 will serve you well. It's an easy grab-and-go for moments when convenience and simplicity beat pushing technical boundaries.
Both cameras were great in their time for their intended users. Your choice comes down to balancing portability and ease against control and image excellence - a classic tradeoff I always highlight when mentoring new photographers.
I hope this extensive comparison helps you cut through specs and marketing fluff. Photography is ultimately about making images that excite and inspire you. Pick the tool that makes that process most enjoyable and effective for your style, and keep creating.
Happy shooting!
- Your Trusted Camera Tester and Enthusiast
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FP7 Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN-F | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2016-01-27 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.90 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 427 gr (0.94 lb) | 147 gr (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,000 | $227 |