Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic G6
84 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66


74 Imaging
52 Features
79 Overall
62
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic G6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Launched January 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 160 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 122 x 85 x 71mm
- Launched April 2013
- Earlier Model is Panasonic G5
- Refreshed by Panasonic G7

Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6: An Expert Comparison for the Discerning Photographer
From the moment I picked up the Olympus PEN-F and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 side-by-side, I realized this comparison would be a rich exploration of two distinct eras and philosophies within the mirrorless Micro Four Thirds ecosystem. Both cameras cater to creative photographers, yet their unique approaches to design, image-making, and usability reveal a lot about how mirrorless tech evolved from 2013 to 2016.
In this detailed hands-on comparison, drawing from my extensive field testing across genres including portrait, landscape, wildlife, and video, I’ll unpack everything you need to know to decide which of these cameras fits your style and requirements. Let’s dive right in.
First Impressions: Size and Ergonomics Matter
When comparing cameras at this level, size and handling significantly influence your shooting experience. Holding both the Olympus PEN-F and Panasonic G6, the differences are immediately noticeable.
Side-by-side view highlights Olympus PEN-F’s compact, rangefinder-style body vs Panasonic G6’s larger, DSLR-inspired grip.
The Olympus PEN-F embraces a sleek rangefinder-style mirrorless body with classic retro charm, weighing in at approximately 427 grams and dimensions of 125x72x37 mm. The Panasonic G6, more of a traditional DSLR-style mirrorless, is slightly lighter at 390 grams but notably bulkier due to its deeper grip and taller profile (122x85x71 mm).
This size difference translates to distinct handling sensations. The PEN-F is delightfully compact but requires a more delicate grip, something I noticed during longer sessions. Meanwhile, the G6 offers a chunkier, more substantial hold which, for me, improved stability in telephoto or video handheld shooting.
Outfitted for Control: Button Layout and User Interface
Let's take a closer look at control design and interface, crucial for fluid operation in fast-moving situations or detailed manual shooting.
Olympus PEN-F’s minimal, clean top controls contrast with Panasonic G6’s traditional button-rich layout.
Olympus went for a stripped-back top plate with intuitive analog dials that evoke classic film cameras. It’s a design that rewards familiarity with manual controls - aperture, shutter speed, and exposure compensation are accessible through dedicated chiming dials that feel precise and satisfying.
The Panasonic G6, by contrast, features a more conventional top plate with mode dials and programmable buttons. This layout benefits beginners or users transitioning from DSLRs, offering a more straightforward learning curve but also sacrificing some of the PEN-F’s charm and control finesse.
Sensor and Image Quality: Resolving the Core of Your Images
Underneath the hood, both cameras sport Four Thirds sensors - the de facto standard for Micro Four Thirds. But sensor tech and image processing tell a deeper story.
Four Thirds sensor visual comparison - subtle improvements in resolution and dynamic range in PEN-F’s sensor.
The Olympus PEN-F features a 20MP CMOS sensor paired with Olympus’s TruePic VII processor. Panasonic G6 carries a 16MP sensor calibrated for efficient performance. In my side-by-side pixel peeping and field tests, the PEN-F edged out with richer color depth (DXO mark 23.1 bits vs 21.3 for G6) and better dynamic range (12.4 EV vs 11.5 EV). That means clean highlight recovery and nuanced shadow rendering, particularly important for landscape and portraiture under natural light.
Another noticeable difference is low-light performance. PEN-F's native ISO starts at 200, boosting noise control effectively past ISO 1600 with usable, clean results. The G6 performs decently but displays earlier noise onset when pushing ISO above 800.
If ultimate image quality is paramount - especially for large prints or heavy post-processing - the PEN-F’s sensor and processor pairing firmly take the lead.
Viewing Experience: Screens and Electronic Viewfinders
The camera is your window to the scene, and the quality of the viewfinder and rear screen impacts composition and focusing accuracy.
PEN-F’s high-res 3” fully articulating touchscreen vs G6’s wide-viewing TFT screen.
Olympus’s PEN-F sports a 3-inch fully articulating touchscreen with 1,037k dots, offering sharp, vibrant live views and intuitive touch-to-focus capabilities. Also, the PEN-F’s electronic viewfinder (EVF) boasts 2,360k dots resolution with 0.62x magnification ensuring crisp framing and manual focus precision.
In comparison, the Panasonic G6's 3-inch articulating TFT touch screen has nearly identical resolution (1,036k dots) but slightly less vibrant due to older panel tech. Its EVF clocks in at 1,440k dots with 0.7x magnification - adequate but noticeably less refined.
In practice, during street and macro photography, PEN-F’s EVF delivered faster refresh rates and clearer focus aids, making it easier to nail manual focus under challenging light. The G6’s viewfinder work fine but felt sluggish at times and pixelated in darker environments.
Autofocus Systems: Tracking Your Subject
The autofocus prowess is crucial in genres like sports, wildlife, and street photography where moments vanish quickly.
Both cameras use contrast-detection autofocus, but with differences in sophistication and coverage:
-
Olympus PEN-F: 81 focus points, including face detection and standard tracking. It offers excellent continuous AF at 10 frames per second shooting speed, allowing smooth focus tracking.
-
Panasonic G6: 23 focus points, also with face and tracking detection. It maxes out at 7 frames per second, slightly slower.
In my real-world testing for wildlife and sports, the PEN-F’s autofocus was more reliable locking on eyes and faces, maintaining tracking through erratic motion. The denser AF point spread gives it an advantage when framing erratically moving subjects, and the higher continuous shooting rate is a bonus. The G6 functions well for casual use but demands more patience and skill in fast-paced scenarios.
Creative Controls: Focus Bracketing, Stacking, and Post Focus
Olympus’s PEN-F shines in advanced creative modes. It offers in-camera focus bracketing and focus stacking, features that enable greater depth of field control and sharpness in macro and product photography. This was a real boon during my close-up shoots of flowers and small objects, allowing me to generate images with tack-sharp detail front to back without external software.
Panasonic G6 lacks these capabilities, representing a missed opportunity for macro enthusiasts and those interested in depth stacking without tethered processing.
Built Quality and Durability
Neither camera offers weather sealing, waterproofing, or rugged shockproofing. That impacts outdoor photographers who frequently shoot in harsh conditions. Both cameras have robust metal components but feel more delicate than professional-grade models.
If you’re a traveler or nature shooter, be prepared to invest in protective covers or cases.
Burst Shooting and Buffer Depth
Fast continuous shooting sustains capturing split-second moments. Olympus PEN-F leads with 10 fps continuous shooting speed, compared to Panasonic G6’s 7 fps. Additionally, the PEN-F’s buffer can handle longer bursts before slowing, beneficial for active shooting in sports or wildlife.
Video Capabilities: Quality and Flexibility
For hybrid shooters who want solid video alongside stills, here’s how these cameras compare:
-
Olympus PEN-F: Full HD at up to 60 fps, utilizing MPEG-4, H.264, and Motion JPEG codecs. However, it lacks 4K or higher resolutions, and no microphone input limits audio control.
-
Panasonic G6: Also Full HD 60 fps maximum, but supports AVCHD codec in addition to MPEG-4, and critically, includes a microphone port for external audio sources. Though not 4K capable, its video features feel more robust for aspiring videographers.
Neither camera has in-body image stabilization for video, so stabilization relies on compatible lenses with optical stabilization or handheld rigs.
Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Endurance
Olympus PEN-F delivers around 330 shots per charge, Panasonic G6 slightly better at 340. Neither is class-leading but sufficient for day trips or studio work with a spare battery.
Both use single SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, so storage is flexible, though no dual slots limit instant backup options.
Connectivity: Sharing and Control Made Easy
Modern camera users expect wireless features. Both cameras have built-in Wi-Fi, allowing convenient image transfer to mobile devices and remote control via official apps. The G6 adds NFC support for quicker pairing - helpful if you prioritize hassle-free connectivity on the go.
Neither camera supports Bluetooth or GPS logging.
Lens Ecosystem: Endless Possibilities
Both PEN-F and G6 use the Micro Four Thirds mount, benefiting from one of the largest and most versatile lens lineups available. Olympus offers superb in-house primes and zooms tailored for optimal sharpness and stabilization, while Panasonic delivers a complementary range with notable lenses favored by video shooters.
With over 100 lenses available for each camera, you can confidently select glass based on photographic needs and budget - a massive advantage for versatility.
Real-Life Application: Putting Them Through the Genres
I have tested both cameras across the major photography disciplines to explore their strengths and weaknesses firsthand.
Portrait Photography
The PEN-F’s 20MP sensor captures exquisite skin tones with nuanced color depth; aided by its sharp live view and articulating screen, framing portraits is intuitive. Its face detection autofocus is accurate and speedy, locking on eyes reliably though it lacks advanced eye detection found in newer cameras.
The G6 yields pleasant portraits but softer detail due to lower resolution sensor and noisier high ISO performance. Its built-in flash is handy for fill light.
Verdict: PEN-F excels for serious portrait enthusiasts seeking polished, fine art results.
Landscape Photography
Here PEN-F’s superior dynamic range and resolution shine. Images have a three-dimensional pop, with shadows and highlights retaining detail, crucial when shooting bright skies and shadowed foliage. Lack of weather sealing demands caution, but the PEN-F’s compact size aids portability during hikes.
G6 performs well but struggles with highlight retention and dynamic scenes.
Wildlife Photography
Fast AF and burst speed on the PEN-F give it an advantage. Its smaller body and combined lens reach provided graceful handling on long tele lenses mounted for birds and mammals. The G6’s slower AF and fewer points made tracking quick subjects trickier, leading to missed shots.
Sports Photography
The PEN-F again leads with 10 fps and better AF tracking, capturing decisive moments crisply. The G6’s 7 fps is respectable but less competitive in fast-paced sports.
Street Photography
Both cameras benefit from silent electronic shutter options, though PEN-F’s faster max electronic shutter speed (1/16000s vs no electronic shutter on G6) offers discretion and creativity in bright conditions. PEN-F’s compact form factor also better suits street discreetness; G6’s bulk can attract attention.
Examples highlighting color rendition and detail from both cameras in varied environments.
Macro Photography
The PEN-F’s in-body 5-axis stabilization combined with focus stacking functions enable detailed close-ups with impressive sharpness, unmatched by G6.
Night and Astro Photography
The PEN-F’s better noise control at elevated ISO and 12.4 EV dynamic range present crisper nightscapes - however, both limit long exposure options relative to specialized astro cameras.
Video
Panasonic G6’s mic input, AVCHD support, and wider codec compatibility give it the edge for serious video. PEN-F is more limited but usable for casual Full HD content.
Travel Photography
The PEN-F’s compactness, advanced manual controls, and superior image quality make it a premium travel companion. The G6’s more affordable price and built-in flash support appeal to beginners or budget travelers.
Professional Use
Neither camera fits the full professional needs due to lack of weather sealing and limited file formats but PEN-F’s higher image quality and tethering-friendly features suit serious enthusiasts or semi-pros better.
Quantitative Performance Scores at a Glance
Olympus PEN-F outperforms Panasonic G6 across most metrics in DXO Mark and user experience scores.
Olympus PEN-F’s overall DXO score of 74 outshines the G6’s 61, largely driven by sensor superiority, autofocus sophistication, and burst speeds.
Genre-Specific Ratings: What Delivers Where
Comparison chart clearly showing PEN-F’s dominance in image quality, autofocus, and versatility.
The charts validate qualitative observations: PEN-F excels in portrait, landscape, and fast-action capture, while G6 primarily caters well to beginner-level video and casual shooting.
Pricing and Value: What You Get for Your Money
At launch, the PEN-F commanded roughly $1,000 - a mid-range price for advanced enthusiasts. The G6 was more budget-friendly around $750, reflecting its entry-level positioning.
If image quality, build, and creative control are your priority, the PEN-F justifies the higher investment. For those start-up photographers or videographers who want an affordable introduction to interchangeable lens system photography, the G6 remains compelling.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Who Should Choose Olympus PEN-F?
- Advanced enthusiasts craving refined image quality and manual control experience.
- Portrait, landscape, and street photographers valuing portability with full creative command.
- Macro and nature photographers leveraging focus stacking and superior stabilization.
- Anyone prioritizing a stylish, compact body with modern hybrid capabilities.
Who Should Opt for Panasonic G6?
- Apprentic shooters or hobbyists seeking an affordable, feature-rich mirrorless with solid Full HD video.
- Video-focused enthusiasts wanting external microphone connectivity.
- Those who prefer a DSLR-style body ergonomics for longer shooting sessions.
- Users on a tighter budget benefiting from the extensive Micro Four Thirds lens system.
Closing Notes from My Experience
Writing this comparison has been a rewarding exercise revisiting these two significant Micro Four Thirds cameras. My tests reinforced how camera choice transcends specs - it’s about how a tool fits your hands, style, and vision. The Olympus PEN-F is a camera bursting with character, ideal for those who relish manual photography and uncompromised image quality. The Panasonic G6 plays a solid role as a bang-for-buck all-rounder with accessible features, especially for video.
Both deserve a place in the lineage of mirrorless innovation, and whichever you choose, you’re entering a vibrant lens ecosystem that can power your photographic journey for years.
Happy shooting!
Disclosure: All opinions are based on extensive independent hands-on testing in diverse photographic environments. No manufacturer sponsorship was received for this review.
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic G6 Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN-F | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-01-27 | 2013-04-24 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 160 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,036 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.50 m |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 50, 30, 25fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 427 grams (0.94 lbs) | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 122 x 85 x 71mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 74 | 61 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | 894 | 639 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,000 | $750 |