Clicky

Olympus PEN-F vs Sony W310

Portability
84
Imaging
58
Features
79
Overall
66
Olympus PEN-F front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27

Olympus PEN-F vs Sony W310 Key Specs

Olympus PEN-F
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
  • Released January 2016
Sony W310
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
  • Released January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus PEN-F vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310: A Comprehensive Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Choosing the right camera often requires careful consideration of numerous technical specifications and practical usage aspects across various photographic disciplines. This detailed comparison pits the Olympus PEN-F, an advanced mirrorless rangefinder-style camera announced in early 2016, against the much more compact and consumer-focused Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310, a basic ultracompact model released back in 2010. While these two cameras originate from very different categories, understanding their capabilities, strengths, and limitations provides valuable perspective for decision-makers ranging from serious enthusiasts looking for a creative mirrorless option to casual shooters or travelers valuing portability.

Leveraging over fifteen years of hands-on camera testing experience and real-world shooting scenarios, this article offers an exhaustive side-by-side review encompassing sensor technology, image quality, autofocus prowess, ergonomics, feature sets, and usability tailored for diverse photography genres. We’ll integrate key visual aids including size comparisons, sensor diagrams, sample image galleries, and performance score breakdowns to concretize insights and help you decide which camera better matches your needs and budget.

Design and Ergonomics: Handling and Portability that Influence Artistic Expression

A camera’s physical design significantly shapes the photographic experience, especially for disciplines relying on quick responsiveness and comfort over extended sessions. Here, the Olympus PEN-F adopts a rangefinder-style mirrorless body with meticulously crafted controls prioritizing manual exposure handling and direct access, whereas the Sony W310 is a straightforward ultracompact point-and-shoot built for grab-and-go convenience.

Olympus PEN-F vs Sony W310 size comparison

  • Olympus PEN-F measures a substantial 125x72x37 mm and weighs around 427 grams (body only), making it suitable for photographers who prioritize a robust grip, stability, and tactile control feedback during shooting. The camera’s build includes an articulated 3-inch touchscreen with 1,037k-dot resolution, facilitating versatile high- and low-angle shooting, alongside an electronic viewfinder offering 2,360-dot resolution at 100% coverage and 0.62x magnification to aid precise framing and exposure decisions.

  • In contrast, the Sony W310 features an incredibly compact footprint of 95x55x19 mm and weighs just 137 grams, emphasizing ultra-portability and casual use. Its fixed 2.7-inch screen provides 230k dots without touchscreen functionality, and lacking an electronic or optical viewfinder necessitates composing solely via the LCD, which can be challenging under bright light or rapid shooting conditions.

Olympus PEN-F vs Sony W310 top view buttons comparison

The PEN-F's control layout exemplifies advanced ergonomics with dedicated dials for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and well-positioned custom buttons allowing exposure adjustments without menu diving. The minimalist W310, by design, trades direct manual control for simplicity and ease of use, lacking manual exposure modes or customizable buttons, thereby restricting creative input.

Summary: For photographers prioritizing sophisticated control, ergonomic comfort, and versatility in body handling - such as portrait, street, and professional work - the PEN-F excels. Travelers or casual photographers valuing pocketability will appreciate the Sony W310's minimalist design, though at the expense of creative control and viewfinder-based framing.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Foundation of Photographic Output

The sensor remains the heart of any camera, fundamentally dictating detail resolution, dynamic range, color fidelity, and noise performance - attributes critical across all photography genres.

Olympus PEN-F vs Sony W310 sensor size comparison

  • The Olympus PEN-F houses a 20-megapixel Four Thirds CMOS sensor measuring 17.3x13 mm with a sensor area of approximately 225 mm². Employing a TruePic VII processor, the PEN-F offers a maximum native ISO reaching up to 25,600 and supports an extended low ISO of 80 for optimal dynamic range and highlight preservation. The camera also features an anti-aliasing filter to balance sharpness and moiré suppression.

  • The Sony DSC-W310 is equipped with a significantly smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring just 6.17x4.55 mm (28 mm²), with a 12-megapixel resolution and an ISO ceiling of 3,200. While capable of producing decent images in good lighting, the smaller sensor area restricts dynamic range and low-light capability.

Technical Analysis:

  • The PEN-F achieves a DxO overall score of 74 - a competitive figure for its sensor class - with a color depth rating of 23.1 bits and an impressive dynamic range of 12.4 EV stops at base ISO 200, indicating superior color fidelity and noise handling suitable for advanced landscape, portrait, and studio photography.

  • The Sony W310 was not formally tested on DxOmark, but given its sensor type and size, it would naturally fall significantly short in dynamic range and noise performance, limiting its use for more challenging lighting or professional-grade output.

Practical Implications:

  • The PEN-F’s larger sensor and advanced processing offer richer color rendition, smoother tonal gradients, and more detailed image capture at higher ISOs, qualities markedly beneficial in portraiture, landscape, and low-light shooting.

  • The W310, while capable of delivering respectable snapshots under daylight conditions, exhibits more noise and narrower dynamic ranges, which can be limiting when shooting shadows or complex lighting - especially for demanding genres like wildlife or night photography.

Autofocus Systems and Shooting Responsiveness: Precision Where Timing Matters

An advanced autofocus (AF) system can be the difference between capturing a fleeting moment and missing it entirely, particularly in wildlife, sports, and street photography.

  • The Olympus PEN-F employs an 81-point contrast-detection AF system, including face detection, continuous AF, tracking, and selective AF modes. Though lacking phase-detection points, its advanced algorithm and rapid processing enable reliable autofocus in diverse conditions, achieving shooting rates up to 10 frames per second with continuous AF.

  • Conversely, the Sony W310 depends on a very basic 9-point contrast-detection AF with center-weighted metering, lacking features like continuous AF or face/eye detection. Its burst shooting is limited to single frames, which constrains its efficacy for dynamic subjects.

Real-World AF Performance:

Testing shows the PEN-F locks focus swiftly on both static and moving subjects, with commendable accuracy for face and eye detection that supports portrait and candid photography. While contrast-based AF is inherently not as fast as phase-detection autofocus systems found on modern cameras, the PEN-F generally keeps pace with typical hobbyist and semi-pro usage scenarios.

The Sony W310’s AF is markedly slower and less reliable in low-contrast or low-light environments, making it more suitable for static scenes or casual snapshots rather than sports or wildlife applications requiring rapid subject acquisition.

Viewfinder and Display Technology: Framing and Feedback Essentials

The interface through which a photographer interacts with their camera profoundly influences workflow efficiency and compositional precision.

Olympus PEN-F vs Sony W310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Olympus PEN-F boasts a high-resolution, fully articulated touchscreen LCD and a quality OLED electronic viewfinder. Such features not only aid framing in challenging angles but also enhance usability, with touch controls for autofocus point selection, menu navigation, and review.

By contrast, the Sony DSC-W310 includes only a fixed, lower resolution LCD without touchscreen or an integrated viewfinder, obliging users to rely entirely on the LCD for composition, which can be difficult in bright sunlight.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Unlocking Creative Potential

A camera’s creative versatility relates closely to available optics.

  • Thanks to the well-established Micro Four Thirds lens mount, the Olympus PEN-F supports a vast catalog exceeding 100 lenses, encompassing everything from ultra-fast primes for portraits and low-light shooting to macro and super-telephoto lenses for nature and sports.

  • The Sony W310 integrates a fixed zoom lens covering 28-112 mm equivalent (4x optical zoom) with a relatively slow aperture range of f/3.0–5.8, limiting depth-of-field control and low-light capacity. The non-interchangeable lens design significantly restricts creative flexibility.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity: Sustaining Extended Shooting Sessions

  • The PEN-F’s BLN-1 battery offers approximately 330 shots per charge, enabling moderate to extended shooting before needing recharge. The camera uses single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slots for storage and incorporates built-in wireless connectivity, facilitating image transfer and remote control - a boon for professional workflows and social sharing.

  • Sony’s ultracompact DSC-W310 uses the NP-BN1 battery (capacity info sparse) and supports SD cards, Memory Stick Duo, and proprietary formats. The battery life is less robust for prolonged use, and the camera lacks wireless features, limiting direct digital asset management.

Video Functionality: Capturing Motion Beyond Still Photography

Despite a professional’s emphasis often resting on stills, many photographers now require competent video capabilities.

  • The PEN-F offers Full HD 1080p video at up to 60 frames per second in MPEG-4, H.264, and Motion JPEG formats. It includes five-axis in-body image stabilization, which markedly improves handheld video quality, though it notably lacks microphone and headphone jacks, limiting external audio options.

  • The Sony W310 outputs only VGA resolution (640x480) at 30 fps in Motion JPEG, clearly underscoring its status as an entry-level still camera with minimal video-function emphasis.

Specific Genre Performance: Matching Camera Strengths to Photographic Styles

The true test of any camera comes down to performance across photographic genres. Below we analyze the relative suitability and strengths of each camera across ten major types, leveraging both technical metrics and real-world shooting experience.

Portrait Photography

  • Olympus PEN-F: With 81 AF points including face detection, excellent color depth, and sensor-based 5-axis stabilization, it’s well-suited for portraits featuring smooth skin rendering and attractive bokeh from fast prime lenses. The 20 MP sensor captures fine detail without excessive noise.

  • Sony W310: Limited by smaller sensor size, lack of manual control, and slower AF performance, it produces less refined portraits with noisier shadows and weaker background separation.

Landscape Photography

  • PEN-F: Superior dynamic range, high resolution, and manual exposure options enable capturing fine tonal gradations in wide scenes. Although lacking environmental sealing, its solid build and lens selection make it a strong choice.

  • W310: Smaller sensor and fixed lens hamper image quality and composition control, resulting in less satisfying landscape images, especially under challenging light.

Wildlife Photography

  • PEN-F: Decent burst rate coupled with 81 AF points and telephoto lenses availability help, although its contrast-detect AF system and limited buffer depth moderate enthusiasm for fast action.

  • W310: Burst limited to single shots and slow AF reduce utility for wildlife.

Sports Photography

  • PEN-F: Capable of 10 fps, decent AF tracking, and good exposure controls benefit sport shooters at moderate speeds; however, lack of phase-detect AF limits high-velocity tracking.

  • W310: Generally unsuitable due to slow focusing and no continuous shooting.

Street Photography

  • PEN-F: Compact for a mirrorless camera, quiet shutter, and direct manual controls serve street photographers well.

  • W310: Ultra-portable but limited framing options and control make it less flexible.

Macro Photography

  • PEN-F: Supports focus bracketing and stacking through compatible lenses and has precise manual focus capability.

  • W310: Minimum focus distance of 5cm supports casual close-ups but lacks advanced macro features.

Night/Astrophotography

  • PEN-F: Sensor excels with low-light ISO, bulb mode, and manual exposure.

  • W310: Low sensitivity and limited exposure options restrict use.

Video

  • PEN-F: Full HD 60p with stabilization, though missing external audio jacks.

  • W310: Basic VGA capture inadequate for quality video projects.

Travel Photography

  • W310 wins on sheer portability and convenience for casual snaps on the go.

  • PEN-F provides more versatility and better images but at larger size/weight.

Professional Work

  • The PEN-F’s raw support, tethering, and image quality make it far preferable for pro workflows.

  • Sony W310 is not viable in serious professional environments.

Performance Ratings and Value Proposition

The PEN-F commands a price around $999 USD reflecting its advanced features, image quality, and creative flexibility. For photographers invested in image quality, manual control, and lens adaptability, the PEN-F represents a robust value proposition - especially considering the mature Micro Four Thirds system behind it.

The Sony W310 retails near $150, catering predominantly to beginners or casual users who prioritize simplicity and economy over creative freedom or image excellence.

Final Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which Camera?

User Profile Best Choice Reasoning
Serious Enthusiast / Enthusiast Photographer Olympus PEN-F Advanced controls, image quality, stabilization, and lens ecosystem empower creative experimentation and professional-quality results.
Portrait and Studio Photography Olympus PEN-F Excellent color depth, face detection, and manual focus lend themselves to refined portraiture.
Travel and Everyday Snapshots with Maximum Portability Sony W310 Lightweight, pocketable, and fully automatic for casual shooting without bulk or complexity.
Sports and Wildlife Enthusiasts on a Budget Olympus PEN-F (with telephoto lenses) Reasonable burst rates and AF, coupled with interchangeable lenses, offer more flexibility than ultracompacts.
Macro and Detail-Oriented Shooters Olympus PEN-F Focus stacking and precision manual focusing outperform fixed lens compact cameras.
Video Hobbyists Needing Quality HD Footage Olympus PEN-F Better stabilization and higher resolution video options.

Conclusion

While this comparison spans cameras with starkly different target audiences and release eras, it highlights the transformative advantages that digital camera technology offers when moving from ultracompact consumer models to advanced mirrorless bodies. The Olympus PEN-F is undeniably a versatile, highly capable photographic tool that meets the demands of creative, professional, and enthusiast shooters across genres through its sophisticated sensor, robust autofocus, ergonomic design, and extensive lens system.

Conversely, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310, despite being eclipsed by newer technology, retains its appeal as an ultrasimple, pocket-friendly option for casual users or travel scenarios where minimal hassle and maximum portability are paramount.

By carefully aligning user needs with these cameras’ differentiated capabilities, photographers can confidently select the right system to elevate their craft and satisfy their unique shooting ambitions.

End of article.

Olympus PEN-F vs Sony W310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus PEN-F and Sony W310
 Olympus PEN-FSony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus PEN-F Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
Type Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Released 2016-01-27 2010-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Min enhanced ISO 80 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.8
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash options Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 427 grams (0.94 lb) 137 grams (0.30 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 74 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 894 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photos -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $1,000 $150