Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 8000
88 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus SH-50 and Olympus 8000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-50 was released 3 years after the 8000 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the SH-50 grades against the 8000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SH-50 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus 8000
SH-50 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | July 2009 | Newer by 43 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus SH-50
8000 | SH-50 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Olympus 8000
SH-50 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-50 enjoys outside measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus 8000 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-50 and Olympus 8000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the SH-50 vs the 8000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-50 and 8000 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-50 and 8000.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-50 to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The newer SH-50 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Olympus SH-50 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SH-50 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Other name | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-01-08 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $380 |