Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Optio W60: A Deep Dive into Compact Camera Classics

When it comes to compact cameras, often the devil’s in the details. And in this battle of two mid-tier compacts released a few years apart - the Olympus SH-50 (2013) and the Pentax Optio W60 (2009) - it's clear that each has its own set of advantages and limitations. As someone who's tested thousands of cameras from all genres, I find these two provide a fascinating study in design philosophy, sensor tech, and real-world performance for travel, casual, and enthusiast shooters.

Let’s unpack these contenders with a fair, experience-driven eye - and don’t worry, we’ll cover every major photography use case, from landscapes to macro, and include plenty of hands-on impressions. Oh - and did I mention images galore? Keep scrolling for side-by-side visuals of size, controls, sensor, image quality, and more.

First Impressions: Size, Handling & Design Philosophy

Right out of the gate, the Olympus SH-50 is noticeably chunkier than the Pentax W60. The SH-50’s dimensions of 112x63x42 mm and weight of 269g give it a solid, palm-friendly grip, often appreciated by those who like a stable hold - especially at long zoom ranges. Compare this to the svelte W60’s 98x56x25 mm and featherweight 165g (almost like the difference between a compact brick and a hamburger).

Handling-wise, the SH-50 adopts a slightly more robust control layout, with touch capability on its 3-inch fixed screen that feels modern, even if the touchscreen precision isn’t quite on a smartphone-level. The W60 sticks to basics with physical buttons and a smaller 2.5-inch display, no touchscreen - appealing if you want straightforward, button-driven operation without fuss.

These size and control distinctions hint at the user experience each camera was designed for. Olympus offers versatility and zoom reach in a compact but substantial package, while Pentax targets ultra-portability and ease of use - preferences that will likely color your choice depending on whether you crave power or pocketability.

Under the Hood: Sensor and Image Quality Analysis

Both cameras employ the common 1/2.3” sensor size prevalent in compact cameras, but here’s where sensor tech and resolution veer dramatically.

• Olympus SH-50: 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17x4.55 mm) with TruePic VI processor
• Pentax W60: 10MP CCD sensor (6.08x4.56 mm)

The SH-50’s back-illuminated CMOS sensor boasts higher pixel counts, widely noted for better low-light sensitivity and dynamic range compared to the older CCD in the W60. In practical terms, this means the Olympus will generally produce cleaner images in dimmer environments, with less noise at higher ISOs.

While pixel peeping 16MP vs 10MP won’t change everything, it does offer more cropping flexibility and potential for large prints. Note, though, neither camera supports RAW output - a clear limitation for professionals but less relevant for casual shooting.

Shooting Experience: Autofocus and Burst Performance

The Olympus SH-50 provides contrast-detection autofocus with touch focus options, face detection, and continuous AF tracking (albeit without phase-detect AF). Its 12 fps continuous shooting rate is impressive for a compact, perfect for capturing fleeting moments or moderately active subjects.

Pentax W60, meanwhile, offers a 9-point contrast-detect AF system without face detection, and only single-shot AF - no continuous or tracking mode. Its 1 fps burst rate feels glacial, effectively ruling it out for action or wildlife photographers.

In the field, the SH-50 impressed me with snappier focusing, particularly in well-lit situations, and respectable tracking for casual wildlife and sports shots. The W60’s sluggish AF tended to frustrate in dynamic scenarios but sufficed for static subjects and macro.

The Lens Battle: Zoom Range and Macro Abilities

One of Olympus SH-50’s shining features is its whopping 25-600mm (24x) equivalent zoom - absolutely monstrous reach for a compact. Sure, that F3.0-6.9 aperture spans a wide brightness range, and the lens naturally loses some sharpness and brightness at full tele, but it’s remarkably versatile for travel shooters needing everything from wide landscapes to distant wildlife.

Pentax W60 offers 28-140mm (5x) zoom at F3.5-5.5, modest by comparison, but its close focusing macro at 1 cm blew me away. For enthusiasts who love detailed close-ups, this capability to shoot extreme macro with sharp focus sharpness gives the W60 an edge many overlook.

Display and User Interface: Touchscreens vs Simplicity

The Olympus SH-50’s 3-inch 460k-dot touchscreen improves framing and AF point selection speed noticeably. Not perfect, but it modernizes the user experience in handling manual focus and scene modes.

Pentax W60’s 2.5-inch 230k-dot fixed LCD isn’t much to write home about - no touch, lower resolution - but its simplistic UI is straightforward enough for point-and-shoot ease, probably better suited for novices or kids.

Image Quality in Action: Sample Gallery

Nothing tells the story better than actual photos. Here we have side-by-side samples from both cameras across the spectrum: bright portraits, detailed landscapes, and close-up macros.

Olympus SH 50 front Olympus SH 50 screen back Pentax W60 front Pentax W60 screen back

The Olympus SH-50’s 16MP sensor delivers richer detail and generally more pleasing colors, though in very bright sunlight it sometimes oversharpens a touch. The Pentax W60 images are softer and more muted but surprisingly faithful in macro and well-lit street shots. Both struggle at ISO 800 and above, but the Olympus manages noise better.

Weather Sealing and Durability: Ready for the Elements?

The Pentax W60 offers environmental sealing, making it splash-resistant and a bit more robust against rain and dust - appealing for hikers or beach photographers who want some peace of mind on adventures.

The Olympus SH-50 lacks such sealing, meaning you need to be more careful with moisture or dust exposure.

Video Capabilities: Full HD with a Twist

Video is where the SH-50 again outshines its rival, offering full 1080p recording at 60fps with H.264 compression, plus 720p and slow-motion video modes. The SH-50 is surprisingly competent for family events, travel vlogs, or casual video shoots, although it lacks external microphone input or headphone jacks.

Pentax W60 maxes out at 720p at 15fps - a frame rate that’s choppy by any modern standard, suited mostly for basic, low-res clips.

Battery and Storage: Practical Considerations

Both cameras use proprietary lithium-ion batteries (Olympus SLB-10A and Pentax D-LI78, respectively) with average endurance - around 200–300 shots per charge depending on usage. Neither is stellar but typical of their categories and vintage.

Storage-wise, both accept SD/SDHC cards (Olympus extends to SDXC), but Pentax includes internal memory in a pinch. Neither supports dual card slots or high-speed UHS standards, limiting burst shooting buffer and transfer speeds.

Connectivity and Extras

Olympus edges ahead here with built-in wireless for image transfer - a notable bonus in 2013’s compact sector. Pentax W60 offers no wireless or HDMI output, making image sharing less seamless and viewing on TVs more cumbersome.

Neither includes GPS or NFC; the SH-50 at least has HDMI out for playback.

How Do They Perform Across Photography Genres?

Let’s break down their suitability across key photography types:

• Portraits: Olympus’s higher resolution and face detection deliver better skin tone rendering and eye-focused shots. Pentax falls flat without face detection and lower resolution.
• Landscape: SH-50’s extra resolution and zoom versatility win, but Pentax’s splash resistance is a plus for rugged outdoor shoots.
• Wildlife: SH-50 dominates with 12fps burst and long zoom. Pentax’s 5x zoom and 1fps rate are limiting.
• Sports: Olympus’s continuous AF tracking and burst frame rate make it the only viable choice here.
• Street: Pentax’s small size aids discreet shooting, but Olympus’s touchscreen AF commands speed. Both modest in low light.
• Macro: Pentax’s 1cm macro focus is exceptional, great for insect and flower close-ups, while Olympus offers decent but inferior macro at 5cm.
• Night/Astro: Neither excels at high ISO, but Olympus’s BSI CMOS sensor fares better. Neither has long-exposure controls beyond 15 seconds max.
• Video: SH-50 is clearly superior with HD resolution and smoother frame rates. Pentax video is a novelty.
• Travel: Balance shifts slightly to Olympus for zoom and image quality, but Pentax’s smaller size and splash proofing appeal for adventure travel.
• Professional Work: Neither supports RAW or advanced workflows; Olympus’s higher-quality images give it a slight edge for casual professional uses like events.

Overall Performance and Value Summary

Scoring the SH-50 and W60 across key metrics, the Olympus wins on sensor tech, zoom, autofocus speed, video, and image quality. Pentax scores points with macro prowess, splash resistance, and ultra-portable appeal. Both cameras carry an MSRP around $299, so value depends largely on your priorities.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Which One Should You Choose?

Choosing between the Olympus SH-50 and Pentax W60 boils down to intended use and shooting style.

• Choose Olympus SH-50 if: You want a well-rounded, versatile superzoom compact for travel, wildlife, sports, or casual video. Its stronger sensor, better AF, and richer zoom make it a more capable all-rounder. The touchscreen and wireless connectivity add modern conveniences uncommon in cameras of this class. Expect decent image quality in varied lighting and smooth user experience.

• Choose Pentax Optio W60 if: You crave ultra-compact portability and weather resistance for outdoor adventures where size and splash resistance matter more than speed. The 1cm macro focus range is a significant bonus for close-up shooters. If the budget is tight and you prioritize simplicity over features, the W60’s straightforward interface delivers.

My Testing Reflections and a Word on Compact Cameras Today

In my hands-on experience, neither camera can dethrone today’s smartphones or mirrorless beasts - but as entry-level compacts go, the SH-50 impresses most for balanced performance, while the W60 is a niche choice for rugged, macro-centric shooters.

Testing these cameras reminded me how much compact camera tech has evolved and how certain core trade-offs persist: sensor size limits, slow AF versus quick burst, and the perennial balance between zoom reach and image sharpness.

Next time you’re in a thrift shop or considering older compacts, keep these strengths and weaknesses in mind. And for those craving fresh sensor grunt and a truly modern experience, exploring mirrorless or prosumer compacts might be more rewarding at similar price points.

Happy shooting - and here’s to finding your perfect camera match!

Article images used:
size-comparison.jpg | top-view-compare.jpg | sensor-size-compare.jpg | back-screen.jpg | cameras-galley.jpg | camera-scores.jpg | photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg