Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b1a/c1b1aca5a367ce52d585dfa9c9ef670048d691fe" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Pentax WG-2 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was brought out 4 years before the WG-2 GPS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the SP-565UZ grades vs the WG-2 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
SP-565UZ | WG-2 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
WG-2 GPS | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Pentax WG-2 GPS
SP-565UZ | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys exterior dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 GPS has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Pentax WG-2 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the WG-2 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f0f9/7f0f9aa161943619df5cdccc854a52f61b1370ee" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and WG-2 GPS is 72 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62320/62320ecf12b13b4bf28359f2d8be67c3d9d17c28" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The pic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and WG-2 GPS.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-2 GPS to deliver more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6998/f6998da0346a15904fc6da638a0e66f525a6f2ca" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/133d6/133d6bcbebc2ae29ce325ead93a2548c2f813f90" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-01-15 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 pounds) | 198g (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $400 | $300 |