Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/777f4/777f4738a75e07be4efdf04b6a8248a582ca2b95" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front"
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Sony S2000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is pretty similar and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was manufactured 11 months earlier than the S2000 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SP-565UZ grades versus the S2000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Sony S2000
SP-565UZ | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
S2000 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 11 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony S2000
SP-565UZ | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers exterior measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Sony S2000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the S2000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad60e/ad60e05fa59d6fcd29564b66c844dddcaba4c274" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and S2000 is 72 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f11c/7f11c7c2e52366e318c07bef687b6d946cfa904d" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and S2000.
All in all, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels so you should expect similar quality of photographs however you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6344/a6344d2b2784fde1d54e0a2bb4eed7083b9b0cf4" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8620/d8620f91e6a1a873db652ea5d57b7090728e044d" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony S2000 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 3.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $225 |