Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
![Olympus SP-590 UZ front Olympus SP-590 UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-590-UZ/Olympus-SP-590-UZ-front.jpg)
![Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-TG-320/Olympus-TG-320-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
- Replacement is Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The SP-590 UZ was launched 4 years prior to the TG-320 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SP-590 UZ scores versus the TG-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-590 UZ & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus TG-320
SP-590 UZ | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
TG-320 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 36 months |
Common features in the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Olympus TG-320
SP-590 UZ | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display size |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-590 UZ enjoys physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the SP-590 UZ vs the TG-320.
![Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SP-590-UZ-vs-Olympus-TG-320-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-590 UZ and TG-320 is 72 and 94 respectively.
![Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SP-590-UZ-vs-Olympus-TG-320-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The graphic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-590 UZ and TG-320.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The older SP-590 UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
![Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-SP-590-UZ-vs-Olympus-TG-320-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SP-590-UZ-vs-Olympus-TG-320-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus SP-590 UZ | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SP-590 UZ | Olympus TG-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.00 m | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $249 | $0 |