Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A300
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2008
- Replacement is Sony A330
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A300 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony A300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-600 UZ was manufactured 2 years after the A300 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SP-600 UZ matches up against the A300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Sony A300
SP-600 UZ | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | January 2008 | More modern by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
A300 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony A300
SP-600 UZ | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-600 UZ provides physical measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony A300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the SP-600 UZ compared to the A300.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-600 UZ and A300 is 69 and 64 respectively.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The pic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-600 UZ and A300.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SP-600 UZ due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus SP-600 UZ will produce extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger SP-600 UZ will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A300 Specifications
Olympus SP-600 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2008-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 632 gr (1.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $189 | $0 |