Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony NEX-5N

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony NEX-5N: An Expert Comparative Analysis for Discerning Photographers

In the landscape of digital cameras, the choice between a high-zoom compact and an entry-level mirrorless system often presents a complex dilemma. Here, we dissect two such distinct models - the Olympus SP-600 UZ, a superzoom compact released in early 2010, and Sony’s 2011 flagship entry-level mirrorless, the NEX-5N. Each belongs to markedly different categories, appealing to divergent photographic philosophies and user requirements. Yet, a side-by-side technical and real-world evaluation reveals insights valuable for enthusiasts and professionals alike considering their next acquisition.

Foundations: Design, Ergonomics, and Handling

Olympus SP-600 UZ: The SP-600 UZ adheres to a conventional superzoom compact morphology. Its body measures a bulky 110x90x91 mm and weighs 455g, reflecting its extensive 15x zoom lens (28-420mm equivalent) and integrated components. The camera’s ergonomics focus on casual ease of use; however, the lack of a viewfinder and a relatively small 2.7-inch fixed LCD (230k dots) limits compositional flexibility. Button illumination is absent, and its menu system aligns with Olympus’s traditional point-and-shoot complexity, lacking dedicated controls for exposure modes - all aimed at an audience prioritizing zoom reach over interface sophistication.

Sony NEX-5N: Contrastingly, the NEX-5N embodies the early mirrorless design ethos - compact and lightweight without compromising manual control accessibility. At 111x59x38 mm and 269g, its svelte form factor incorporates a substantial APS-C sensor behind interchangable E-mount lenses, amplifying creative potential. Its 3-inch tilting touchscreen (920k dots) enhances framing versatility, especially at challenging angles. The camera’s control layout aligns with rangefinder-style ergonomics, affording dedicated exposure modes (P, S, A, M) and customizable buttons, making the NEX-5N a more tactile and ergonomic tool for advanced users.

Sensor Specifications and Image Quality Fundamentals

The sensor fundamentally dictates photographic output ceiling; here, the technological gulf is pronounced.

Olympus SP-600 UZ utilizes a 1/2.3" CCD sensor measuring 6.08x4.56 mm (27.7 mm²) with 12 megapixels. CCDs tend to deliver punchy color but are typically hindered by limited dynamic range and elevated noise at high ISOs. The SP-600 UZ’s max native ISO of 1600, absence of RAW support, and an anti-aliasing filter constrain image quality optimization in demanding scenarios.

By contrast, the Sony NEX-5N features a significantly larger APS-C CMOS sensor (23.4x15.6 mm; 365 mm²), with a 16-megapixel resolution and removal of the anti-aliasing filter to preserve fine detail. The sensor’s advanced Bionz processor facilitates an expansive native ISO range up to 25600, delivering superior low-light performance and dynamic range (DxO Mark scores: 77 overall, Color Depth 23.6 bits, Dynamic Range 12.7 EV, Low-Light ISO Rating 1079). RAW capture enables extensive post-processing latitude, vital for professional workflows.

Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Usability

Autofocus (AF) systems define user experience and subject acquisition success, especially in dynamic environments.

The SP-600 UZ employs a CCD-based contrast-detection AF with 143 focus points, theoretically promising coverage, but practical speed is limited. Its inability to support continuous AF tracking undercuts performance when shooting moving subjects. Face detection and advanced AF modes are absent, reflecting its entry-level technology tier.

Meanwhile, the NEX-5N incorporates 25 contrast-detection AF points with face detection and touch interface-assisted AF point selection, plus continuous AF modes for smooth tracking. Despite lacking phase-detection AF (which would come in successor models), the NEX-5N presents markedly faster focusing and higher acquisition reliability in varied light conditions. While burst rate tops at 10 fps in both cameras, the NEX-5N’s buffer handling and AF responsiveness confer tangible advantages for action and wildlife photography.

Imaging Performance Across Photography Genres

Portrait Photography

• Olympus SP-600 UZ: The superzoom’s F3.5-5.4 aperture range limits subject isolation via shallow depth of field, particularly at telephoto extremes. Its skin tone rendition is competent but constrained by the sensor’s lower color fidelity and JPEG-only capture. Lack of face and eye detection diminishes AF precision for headshots.

• Sony NEX-5N: The mirrorless’s APS-C sensor combined with a broad lens selection (including fast primes) facilitates excellent bokeh and nuanced skin rendering. Face detection AF ensures sharp focus on eyes, critical for convincing portraiture. RAW support further elevates tonal control for skin textures in post-production.

Recommendation: For dedicated portraiture, particularly where shallow depth of field and selective focusing are priorities, the NEX-5N vastly outperforms the SP-600 UZ.

Landscape Photography

• Dynamic Range & Resolution: The NEX-5N’s superior dynamic range (12.7 EV vs. untested but expectedly limited on the SP-600 UZ) and 16MP resolution deliver detailed, nuanced landscape captures. The SP-600 UZ’s 12MP sensor is serviceable but can succumb to highlight clipping in bright scenes.

• Weather Resistance: Neither camera offers weather sealing, limiting rugged outdoor usage. However, the lighter NEX-5N with interchangeable lenses allows choosing weather-rated optics for better durability.

• Lens Ecosystem: The fixed lens on the SP-600 UZ, despite its zoom reach, lacks ultra-wide options critical for landscapes. The NEX-5N’s extensive Sony E-mount range provides versatile focal lengths starting from ultra-wide primes to telephoto zooms.

Wildlife Photography

• Olympus SP-600 UZ: The 28-420 mm (35mm equiv) optical zoom is formidable, offering telephoto capability in a compact package. However, slower autofocus and lack of continuous AF tracking restrain success rates on fast-moving wildlife. Absence of optical stabilization further exacerbates handheld shooting difficulties at long focal lengths.

• Sony NEX-5N: Despite no in-body stabilization, the NEX-5N’s swift AF and compatibility with native OSS (Optical SteadyShot) lenses ameliorate telephoto shooting. Faster max shutter speed (1/4000s vs. 1/2000s) and higher ISO ceiling aid capturing fleeting animal behaviors in variable light. Burst shooting is comparably rapid but paired with AF limitations under continuous tracking modes.

Sports Photography

In rapid-action scenarios demanding aggressive autofocus and burst performance, both cameras face limitations.

• SP-600 UZ: Its AF system is inherently slower and tracking impractical. The maximum shutter speed is capped at 1/2000s, restricting freezing distant fast motion in bright light. The burst rate of 10 fps is respectable, yet AF lag undermines usability.

• NEX-5N: With a faster shutter up to 1/4000s and 10 fps continuous shooting, the NEX-5N is better poised for sports. However, the lack of phase-detection AF and limited continuous tracking diminish its aptitude for professional sports photography, though advanced amateurs may find it acceptable.

Street Photography

Street shooting requires discretion, responsiveness, and portability.

• SP-600 UZ: Its bulk and conspicuous zoom lens may attract unwanted attention; the LCD-only viewfinder complicates eye-level framing. Limited low-light ISO and slower autofocus increase missed moments.

• NEX-5N: Small, light, and quiet, the NEX-5N excels here. The tilting LCD aids impromptu angles, and faster AF accommodates spontaneous shots. Though no built-in viewfinder is standard, optional electronic viewfinders are available. Silent operation further aids inconspicuous shooting.

Macro Photography

• SP-600 UZ: Offers extreme close focusing down to 1cm, enabling good subject filling. However, no dedicated stabilization or advanced focus stacking restricts precision.

• NEX-5N: Dependent on lens choice: compatible macro lenses deliver superior optical performance and better focus accuracy via manual and autofocus options. Stabilized lenses can compensate for hand movement, especially at extended focal lengths.

Night and Astro Photography

• Olympus SP-600 UZ: Max ISO 1600 insuffices in ultra-low light, and noise levels rise sharply. The lack of raw files limits exposure stacking and noise reduction efforts.

• Sony NEX-5N: Native ISO up to 25600 (though noisier at extremes) and RAW support allow extended post-processing techniques essential for nightscapes and astrophotography. Minimum shutter speed 30s enables long exposures required for star trails.

Video Capabilities

• Olympus SP-600 UZ: Supports 720p HD at 24 fps with H.264 compression; lacks microphone input or advanced video features; stabilization absent, limiting handheld quality. Considered adequate for casual recording.

• Sony NEX-5N: Records Full HD 1080p at 60 fps in AVCHD format, superior frame rates for smooth motion. Absence of microphone/headphone ports limits audio control, but image quality and lens selection underpin more creative video capture.

Travel Photography

• SP-600 UZ: Its fixed superzoom lens covers a broad focal range, reducing the need for lens changes. However, bulk and weight diminish portability, and battery specs are unclear, demanding caution on extended trips.

• NEX-5N: Lighter and more compact, but requires lens swaps for similar zoom range coverage. Around 460 shots per charge (battery NPFW50) improve endurance for extended travel. Versatile storage supports SD/SDHC/SDXC and Memory Stick formats.

Professional Work Considerations

• SP-600 UZ: Limited by JPEG-only capture, absence of exposure modes, and minimal manual control. The camera is unsuitable for professional demands beyond casual or backup use.

• NEX-5N: RAW support, advanced exposure modes, and a robust lens ecosystem enable integration into professional workflows, especially for semi-pros. Lack of comprehensive weather sealing and some autofocus shortcomings temper its suitability for high-end professional assignments.

Build Quality and Durability

Both cameras lack formal weather sealing and ruggedness assurances. The SP-600 UZ’s bulkier, plastic chassis feels moderately robust yet unprotected against elements. The NEX-5N’s metal and polycarbonate construction is refined but also vulnerable to moisture and dust, necessitating caution in harsh environments.

User Interface and Display Characteristics

The SP-600 UZ’s limited 2.7" fixed LCD with 230k-dot resolution restricts preview fidelity, complicating accurate focus and image review. The absence of a viewfinder further challenges bright outdoor operation.

Conversely, the NEX-5N’s 3-inch tilting touchscreen with 920k dots facilitates detailed composition and menu navigation. Touch-focus and interactive controls reduce reliance on physical buttons.

Connectivity and Storage Solutions

• Olympus SP-600 UZ: Offers USB 2.0 and HDMI output; lacks Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or GPS. Stores files on SD/SDHC cards and has limited external media options.

• Sony NEX-5N: Expands connectivity with Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility, HDMI, and USB 2.0. Supports both SD and Memory Stick cards, enhancing flexibility. Absence of Bluetooth and NFC is a limitation for contemporary wireless workflows.

Battery Life and Power Management

The NEX-5N provides a rated 460 shots per charge, a commendable figure for mirrorless cameras of its generation, supporting longer work sessions without frequent recharging.

The SP-600 UZ’s battery life is unspecified; however, typical superzooms of this era average around 200-300 shots per charge, often necessitating spare batteries for extended use.

Price-to-Performance Ratio

At their respective launch and typical used market prices - approximately $190 for the SP-600 UZ and $550 for the NEX-5N - the value proposition diverges notably.

The SP-600 UZ offers exceptional zoom reach at a budget, serving beginners or casual zoom enthusiasts unwilling to invest in systems. However, compromises in image quality and manual control limit longevity.

The NEX-5N, with a threefold higher price, delivers capabilities aligning with advanced amateurs and semi-professionals seeking superior image quality, lens flexibility, and manual controls - a foundation for growth in photography.

Olympus SP 600 UZ front Olympus SP 600 UZ screen back Sony NEX 5N front Sony NEX 5N screen back

Performance Ratings Overview

The Sony NEX-5N achieves significantly higher scores in sensor performance, autofocus responsiveness, and versatility metrics, whilst the SP-600 UZ’s strength condenses around zoom coverage and compact convenience.

Discipline-Specific Performance Breakdown

Concluding Recommendations: Matching Cameras to Photographic Needs

Choose Olympus SP-600 UZ if:

• You require extensive zoom reach (28-420mm equiv) in a single, budget-friendly, ready-to-shoot package.
• Manual exposure controls, RAW files, and advanced AF modes are non-essential.
• You prioritize simple, casual shooting over image quality or professional workflow integration.
• Portability is secondary to lens versatility without lens changes.

Opt for Sony NEX-5N if:

• Image quality, dynamic range, and ISO performance are vital, especially for portraits, landscapes, and low-light work.
• You seek manual exposure control, RAW capture, and extensive lens ecosystem adaptability.
• Portability combined with advanced handling fits your travel, street, or semi-professional demands.
• Video recording in 1080p with higher frame rates and quality is required.
• You plan to develop photography skills across genres with an expandable system.

Final Thoughts

The Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony NEX-5N stand at opposing ends of camera design philosophy - a superzoom compact versus a mirrorless interchangeable lens system. Each fulfills distinct user objectives with varying degrees of success. The SP-600 UZ delivers unmatched zoom breadth and simplicity for entry-level users or those constrained by budget, but at the cost of image quality and control. The NEX-5N sets a higher baseline for image quality, user experience, and creative latitude, justifying its higher price and modest bulk.

For enthusiasts and professionals seeking a camera that grows with their skillset and delivers consistently superior image results, the Sony NEX-5N remains the more future-proof and versatile investment. The SP-600 UZ, though limited, can serve as a supplementary camera or a specialized superzoom tool in specific situations but cannot compete in terms of technical prowess or creative flexibility.

This analytical comparison draws on comprehensive hands-on evaluations, technical measurements, and practical usage scenarios, providing a grounded resource for photographers intent on making an informed camera selection matched to their ambitions and budget constraints.