Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Launched January 2012
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SP-620 UZ was revealed 17 months earlier than the TG-2 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the SP-620 UZ scores against the TG-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-620 UZ & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SP-620 UZ | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| TG-2 iHS | SP-620 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 17 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SP-620 UZ | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-620 UZ has outside measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the SP-620 UZ vs the TG-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-620 UZ and TG-2 iHS is 78 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-620 UZ and TG-2 iHS.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus SP-620 UZ to result in extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged SP-620 UZ will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $199 | $380 |