Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VG-160
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- New Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Olympus VG-160, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SP-800 UZ was brought out 23 months earlier than the VG-160 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SP-800 UZ scores vs the VG-160 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Olympus VG-160. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus VG-160
| SP-800 UZ | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| VG-160 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 23 months |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Olympus VG-160
| SP-800 UZ | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ features exterior dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Olympus VG-160 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the SP-800 UZ versus the VG-160.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and VG-160 is 69 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The visual here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-800 UZ and VG-160.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of photos however you should always factor the age of the products into consideration. The older SP-800 UZ is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Olympus VG-160 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 12 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455 grams (1.00 pounds) | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $270 | $90 |
