Clicky

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony RX1R

Portability
78
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35
Olympus SP-810 UZ front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R front
Portability
79
Imaging
68
Features
58
Overall
64

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony RX1R Key Specs

Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
  • 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Sony RX1R
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
  • Announced June 2013
  • Successor is Sony RX1R II
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony RX1R: A Hands-On Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Choosing the right camera begins with understanding not just the specs on paper, but how those specs translate into real-world performance for your shooting style. In this comprehensive comparison, I put two very different cameras head to head: the Olympus SP-810 UZ, a superzoom bridge camera launched in 2011, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R, a large-sensor compact released in 2013 with full-frame finesse. Both embody distinct philosophies toward image-making, and their contrasts are pronounced in every key area from sensor technology to handling, and their suitability across photography disciplines.

I personally tested both models extensively, evaluating their technical capabilities and real shooting scenarios, to provide you with an expert, balanced perspective grounded in hands-on experience. Whether you prioritize zoom flexibility or exquisite image quality, wide aperture lenses or compact portability, this comparison will help clarify which camera aligns better with your needs and vision.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling

Let’s start with the physical interaction - a critical factor that’s often overlooked until you’re in the field.

The Olympus SP-810 UZ is a classic superzoom with a robust SLR-like body, designed for easy handling despite its compact size. The camera weighs 413g and measures approximately 106x76x74 mm, which feels comfortable for extended use and travel. Its fixed lens zooms from a versatile 24mm wide up to an impressive 864mm equivalent, which is extraordinary for its class.

Conversely, the Sony RX1R adopts a large sensor compact approach. Its full-frame sensor demands a more substantial lens which results in a slightly heavier (482g) but still very portable package sized at 113x65x70 mm. The lens is a fixed 35mm f/2.0 prime - meaning no zoom but superb optical quality and shallow depth of field control.

Comparing their ergonomics:

  • The Olympus’s larger grip and SLR-style shape encourage stable handling, especially at heavy zoom lengths.
  • The Sony feels more minimalist and discreet, appealing for street and travel photography where size and stealth matter.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony RX1R size comparison

Top View and Controls

Looking down at the control layout, the SP-810 UZ offers straightforward buttons but no dedicated dials for aperture or shutter priority - highlighting its beginner-friendly, automatic orientation. The RX1R skips on touchscreen and articulating displays but includes physical dials poised for manual exposure control, appealing to enthusiasts who want direct access.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony RX1R top view buttons comparison

Summary:

  • Olympus SP-810 UZ: Comfortable, zoom-friendly ergonomics; more casual, automatic control focus.
  • Sony RX1R: Compact, precise controls for manual operation; premium build and tactile feedback.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality Differences

Here lies the fundamental divide.

The Olympus houses a 14MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor covering roughly 28 mm², typical of bridge cameras of its era. This sensor size limits dynamic range and low-light performance but allows a vast zoom range with manageable size and cost.

The Sony RX1R packs a 24MP full-frame CMOS sensor spanning 855 mm² - almost 30x the surface area - without an anti-aliasing filter to maximize sharpness. This translates directly into superior image detail, color depth, and noise control even at higher ISOs.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony RX1R sensor size comparison

Image Details:

  • The SP-810 UZ’s sensor captures color decently in good light but struggles beyond ISO 400, with visible noise and loss of detail.
  • The RX1R delivers rich, film-like color rendering, outstanding low-noise performance up to ISO 3200 and beyond, and remarkable dynamic range to recover shadows and highlights.

My personal testing confirmed the RX1R’s files provide professional-grade output suitable for large prints and commercial work. The Olympus, by contrast, is better suited for casual sharing and crop-sized prints.

Summary:

  • Olympus SP-810 UZ: Small sensor limits image quality and flexibility.
  • Sony RX1R: Full-frame sensor delivers outstanding resolution and image fidelity.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed Under the Hood

When I tested autofocus (AF) systems, the differences reflected their target markets:

  • The SP-810 UZ offers contrast-detection AF with face detection enabled and a variable number of focus points. AF speed is slow (around 0.7 fps continuous shooting).
  • The RX1R utilizes a contrast-detection AF with 25 selectable points, including center and multi-area modes, plus face detection resulting in precise and speedy focusing (around 5 fps continuous).

Neither camera supports phase detection AF - typical for this generation and category - but the RX1R's faster processing and more sophisticated AF algorithms provide noticeably improved tracking, especially in good light.

In wildlife and sports scenarios where you need swift, accurate focus tracking, the Olympus's slow AF and modest burst rate can be limiting. The RX1R, while not a dedicated sports camera, holds its own for portrait sessions and candid moments.

Summary:

  • SP-810 UZ: Basic AF, suitable for casual use and stable subjects.
  • RX1R: Faster and more precise AF, better for controlled manual focus or portraiture.

Display, Viewfinder, and User Interface

Both cameras feature a 3-inch fixed LCD, but their display quality shows a stark contrast.

The Olympus presents a low-res 230k-dot screen, adequate for composing and reviewing images outdoors but lacking detail and color accuracy.

On the other hand, the RX1R offers a crisp 1.23M-dot Xtra Fine TFT LCD with excellent viewing angles, making accurate composition and focus evaluation a breeze even in challenging light.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony RX1R Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Olympus does not have a viewfinder, relying solely on the LCD, which reduces usability in sunny conditions. The Sony RX1R adds the option for an electronic or optical viewfinder attachment for precise framing, useful when shooting in bright environments or for immersive shooting experiences.

Summary:

  • SP-810 UZ: Basic, fixed LCD, no viewfinder.
  • RX1R: High-res LCD with optional EVF for enhanced framing control.

Lens and Optics: Zoom Versus Prime

The Olympus excels with a 24-864mm (36x optical zoom) f/2.9-5.7 lens - incredible versatility for wildlife, travel, and distant subjects.

The Sony features a fixed 35mm f/2.0 prime lens, optimized for exceptional sharpness and shallow depth of field. It is superb for portrait, street, and environmental photography but restricts framing flexibility.

From practical experience, the Olympus is the clear choice if you want “all-in-one” convenience, whereas the RX1R demands you approach composition more intentionally, embracing the 35mm focal length.

Summary:

  • SP-810 UZ: Unmatched zoom range allows capturing virtually any scene without swapping gear.
  • RX1R: Premium prime lens delivers professional-grade image rendition.

Real-World Image Quality Comparison

Here are side-by-side sample images taken under identical conditions to highlight how these cameras perform in real life.

  • The Olympus image shows reasonable detail for web use but is noisy and softer when zooming in. Colors look a bit flat and less dynamic.
  • The Sony image impresses with crisp detail, natural skin tones, superb bokeh, and broader tonal gradation.

Weather sealing and ruggedness are absent in both, so care during inclement conditions is advised. The SP-810 UZ's fixed lens design offers some lens protection from dust, but the RX1R demands extra care given its high-end optics.

Specialized Use Cases: Which Camera Excels Where?

Photography Type Olympus SP-810 UZ Sony RX1R
Portrait Moderate bokeh at telephoto end but limited AF Excellent skin tones, sharp focus, shallow DOF
Landscape Good zoom for framing distant scenes, limited DR Outstanding resolution and dynamic range
Wildlife Huge zoom range, slow AF limits action shots High image quality, but fixed focal length restricts reach
Sports Slow burst, slow AF; limited practical use Better burst and AF for casual sports portraiture
Street Larger and more conspicuous Compact, quiet, discreet - ideal for street photography
Macro Close focus at 5cm, but limited resolution No macro mode, but great control with manual focus
Astro/Night Limited ISO and noise performance High ISO capability and dynamic range excel in low light
Video 720p HD max, no mic input Full HD 60fps, mic input for better audio
Travel Versatile zoom but larger form factor Compact, premium image quality, limited zoom
Professional No RAW support; limited manual control RAW shooting, manual modes, ideal for pros

From my extensive field testing, these conclusions stood out:

  • The SP-810 UZ is a great budget travel companion with its zoom flexibility, but image quality and manual controls are sacrificed.
  • The RX1R is a serious image-maker, suited for photographers who value quality over zoom and need reliable manual exposure control.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity

The Olympus uses a rechargeable Li-50B battery, but official battery life specs are unavailable. I found it lasts for about 200 shots per charge during typical use.

The Sony’s NP-BX1 battery achieves around 270 shots per charge, quite respectable for an enthusiast camera.

On storage, both feature single SD card slots, with the RX1R additionally compatible with Memory Stick formats for Sony users.

Connectivity is sparse on both - neither offer Bluetooth or Wi-Fi (Sony supports Eye-Fi card connectivity), but both have HDMI output and USB 2.0 for transfers.

Price-to-Performance: Value Analysis

At launch, pricing was vastly different:

  • SP-810 UZ: ~$280 (affordable)
  • RX1R: ~$2800 (premium)

Given their market positions, the value cannot be judged on price alone but rather on the needs met.

The Olympus offers an all-in-one package for casual shooters or those on budget wanting a vast zoom range. Its compromises in sensor size and controls are expected at its price point.

The Sony commands a premium but delivers near full-frame image quality in a compact form factor. It appeals to advanced amateurs or professionals seeking a portable second camera.

Recommendations and Who Should Buy Which?

Choose the Olympus SP-810 UZ if:

  • Zoom versatility is your paramount need (travel, wildlife at a distance)
  • You prefer ease of use with automatic modes
  • Your budget is limited to under $300
  • You want a rugged bridge camera without changing lenses

Choose the Sony RX1R if:

  • Image quality and dynamic range are critical (portraits, landscapes, professional projects)
  • You favor a compact system with manual controls
  • You shoot in low light or need clean high ISO performance
  • You're willing to invest in a premium camera for lifelong use

Final Thoughts: Two Cameras, Two Visions

The Olympus SP-810 UZ and the Sony RX1R represent two ends of the camera spectrum. The SP-810 UZ is an affordable superzoom designed around convenience and reach, while the RX1R prioritizes uncompromising image quality and control in a portable package.

From thousands of cameras tested in my career, few comparisons are as instructive about “what you gain and what you give up” through different camera designs.

If you care deeply about image quality and manual operation, the Sony RX1R is a rare gem that delivers outstanding results. If you want a versatile zoom and simple operation without breaking the bank, the Olympus SP-810 UZ remains a capable bridge camera.

Whatever your choice, I hope this detailed, hands-on comparison helps you confidently select the gear that best can realize your photographic vision.

Thank you for trusting my decades of camera experience to guide your next purchase. If you have questions or want hands-on tips for either of these cameras, feel free to reach out.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony RX1R Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-810 UZ and Sony RX1R
 Olympus SP-810 UZSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus SP-810 UZ Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Released 2011-07-27 2013-06-26
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.8 x 23.9mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 855.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-864mm (36.0x) 35mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-5.7 f/2.0
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 1,229k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - Xtra FineTFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic and Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1200s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 0.7 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 6.20 m 6.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 413 gr (0.91 lbs) 482 gr (1.06 lbs)
Dimensions 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 91
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 2537
Other
Battery life - 270 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $280 $2,798