Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh WG-30W
Portability
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
91 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
Olympus SZ-11
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Released July 2011
Ricoh WG-30W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus SZ-11 versus Ricoh WG-30W, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SZ-11 (14MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SZ-11 was launched 4 years before the WG-30W which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short view of how the SZ-11 matches up against the WG-30W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-11 & Ricoh WG-30W. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-11 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| SZ-11 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus SZ-11
| WG-30W | SZ-11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2014 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 39 months |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-11 and Ricoh WG-30W
| SZ-11 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-11 has got exterior measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SZ-11 versus Ricoh WG-30W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the SZ-11 against the WG-30W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-11 and WG-30W is 89 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SZ-11 and WG-30W.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-30W to produce more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged SZ-11 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 Portrait photography info
Ricoh WG-30W Portrait photography info
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with face detect focusing
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus SZ-11
Street photography with Ricoh WG-30W
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (226 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 Sports photography details
Ricoh WG-30W Sports photography details
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery (200 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
weather proof
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-30W as a Travel photography camera
lighter than average in class (226 grams)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low battery (200 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
weather proof
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 Landscape photography info
Ricoh WG-30W Landscape photography info
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low battery (200 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
weather proof
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus SZ-11 Vlogging features
Ricoh WG-30W Vlogging features
reasonably wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than average in class (226 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
missing mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SZ-11 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Olympus SZ-11 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SZ-11 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-07-27 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $253 | $280 |
