Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung EX2F: A Hands-On Comparison for the Practical Photographer

In the world of compact cameras, where pocketability meets power, choosing the right model can feel like a jungle of specs and marketing jargon. Having fired thousands of shots and wrestled with countless cameras in my 15+ years of testing, I’m here to cut through the noise. Today, we’re diving deep into two small sensor compacts from the early 2010s: the Olympus SZ-11, a budget-friendly superzoom, and the Samsung EX2F, a compact with some enthusiast-friendly tweaks. Both release dates place them in fairly close eras - Olympus in mid-2011, Samsung in late 2012 - but their specs and intended audiences differ.

I’ll walk you through everything from their core tech guts to how they perform in your favorite photography genres, and yes, we’ll even talk money and value for your hard-earned cash. So grab a coffee, and let’s get into the nitty gritty.

Quick look: Olympus SZ-11 vs Samsung EX2F - size and physical feel

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling

Right out of the gate, both cameras aim for portability, but they target different user profiles.

Olympus SZ-11 is compactly chunky - 106x69x40 mm and 226 grams. It has a solid, straightforward shape designed for casual use with a decent 20x optical zoom brute force. It's for folks who want a big zoom range in a compact body without paying a fortune.

Samsung EX2F, by contrast, is a bit longer and lighter top-to-bottom (112x62x29 mm, 294 grams). Its slim profile and fully articulated AMOLED screen set it apart, hinting it’s aimed at more creative users who want manual control options and decent low-light ability wrapped in a small body.

Ergonomically, Olympus opts for a simple and approachable layout, while Samsung’s finger grooves and manual dials (a rarity for compact cameras then) favor those who prefer clubs for thumbs over point-and-shoot.

Notice Samsung’s extra dials and buttons catering to manual shooters

Sensor and Image Quality - The Heart of the Matter

At the core, both cameras use small sensors - a limitation unavoidable in compacts from this era.

• Olympus SZ-11: A 1/2.3" CCD sensor delivering 14 megapixels. CCD sensors, while once praised for color richness, tend to lag behind CMOS tech in noise control and dynamic range, especially in low light.

• Samsung EX2F: A larger 1/1.7" BSI-CMOS sensor with 12 megapixels. The Backside Illuminated (BSI) design allows for better low-light sensitivity and cleaner images at higher ISOs compared to the Olympus.

Sensor size and technology affect almost every imaging aspect; Samsung’s larger sensor area of ~41.52mm² outperforms Olympus’s 28.07 mm², giving EX2F an edge in dynamic range and noise performance.

The difference in sensor size and type plays a huge role in image quality and ISO performance

In real-world tests, the Samsung often produced images with richer detail retention and cleaner shadows at ISO 800 and above. Olympus’s CCD sensor struggled slightly more with noise at ISO 400 and above, confirming what the specs suggested.

Screen and Viewing Experience - Live Preview Matters

When shooting in live view mode, the screen’s quality and flexibility are crucial.

• Olympus SZ-11 features a fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with just 460k dots resolution. It’s serviceable but can feel a bit dim under bright daylight.

• Samsung EX2F shines with a 3-inch AMOLED fully articulated screen. Although the resolution numbers aren’t specified, Samsung’s AMOLED tech results in vivid colors, deeper blacks, and wider viewing angles. The articulation adds versatility for shooting awkward angles or composing selfies.

Samsung EX2F’s flexible AMOLED vs Olympus SZ-11’s fixed TFT LCD

Image preview and menu navigation feel smoother on the EX2F, especially when manually tweaking settings. Olympus’s menus are more stripped-down, which fits its target casual crowd.

Lenses and Zoom Ranges - How Far and How Fast?

Both cameras have fixed lenses, which comes with the package in most compacts, but their use cases markedly differ.

• Olympus SZ-11: A massive 25-500mm equivalent zoom (20x optical zoom) with aperture ranging from f/3.0 to f/6.9. This lens is a superzoom workhorse that excels in versatility, letting you capture far-off wildlife or close-up macro shots (down to 1 cm), though the slower aperture at full zoom limits low-light performance.

• Samsung EX2F: A 24-80mm equivalent zoom (3.3x optical zoom), sporting a bright aperture from f/1.4 to f/2.7, excellent for shallow depth-of-field, low-light shooting, and portraiture with creamy bokeh.

The Olympus’s enormous zoom range fits well with travel and wildlife shooters needing reach over image sparkling bokeh or low-light finesse. The Samsung, with its bright lens, is a dream for portrait and street photographers craving control and quality at shorter focal lengths.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance - Speed and Accuracy

Neither camera features cutting-edge phase-detection AF systems; instead, they rely on contrast-detection autofocus, which is a bit slower and more prone to hunting but was typical for the category.

• Olympus SZ-11: Offers face detection and a seven frames per second continuous shooting mode. It also supports autofocus tracking, which can be handy with subjects moving in frame. However, the focusing system isn't fast enough for serious sports or wildlife bursts but workable for casual snapshots.

• Samsung EX2F: Lacks face detection, multi-area AF, or tracking, with just a single contrast AF system. However, it provides manual focus and shutter/aperture priority modes, allowing the enthusiast to take control. Continuous shooting is unspecified, but in practice, it’s adequate for moderate-paced subjects.

Both cameras stumble with moving subjects compared to modern standards, but the Olympus has a slight edge for tracking due to AF tracking capability.

Video Capabilities - For the Vloggers and Filmmakers

If you’re a hybrid shooter wanting stills and video:

• Olympus SZ-11: Shoots HD 720p videos at 30fps, recorded without advanced compression (Motion JPEG). No external mic input or advanced controls.

• Samsung EX2F: Steps up with full HD 1080p at 30fps in H.264 format, resulting in better video quality and smaller files. It also supports manual exposure controls while filming. Unfortunately, no microphone port, but the EX2F at least offers slower sync flash options for creative video effects.

Samsung’s video prowess clearly surpasses Olympus’s here, making it more attractive to content creators who demand sharper and smoother video.

Battery Life and Connectivity - How Long, How Connected?

Unexpectedly, Olympus SZ-11’s battery LIFETIME is rated at 200 shots on a charge while Samsung’s EX2F lacks official battery life specs but generally runs around 250-300 shots per charge based on user reports.

Neither camera supports wireless connectivity like Bluetooth or WiFi, but Samsung impresses with built-in wireless capabilities for file transfers and remote control, boosting convenience in this area.

Durability and Weather Resistance

Neither is ruggedly built or weather-sealed - no shockproof, dustproof, or freezeproof claims for either. Both are designed for casual shooting, so treat them with typical care.

Usability Across Photography Genres

Let’s get real: where does each camera really shine? Here’s how they stack up across major genres.

Portrait Photography

Samsung EX2F takes the cake with its fast aperture lens (f/1.4 - f/2.7), giving you better low-light options and more creative control over depth of field for that luscious bokeh and nicely rendered skin tones. The fully articulated AMOLED screen also helps nail focus on eyes and composition in challenging angles.

Olympus’s SZ-11, hamstrung by a slower zoom lens and no manual control, struggles to deliver the same level of subject separation but can still manage decent portraits in bright daylight.

Landscape Photography

Olympus SZ-11’s 20x zoom allows framing a wide variety of scenic compositions from vast panoramas to distant features. However, its 1/2.3" CCD sensor limits dynamic range and color depth, which landscape lovers will notice in shadows and highlights.

Samsung’s larger sensor improves dynamic range, but limited zoom restricts compositional flexibility. The EX2F shines in detail and color but asks you to move physically closer.

Wildlife Photography

Here, Olympus’s superzoom and 7 fps burst mode are hard to beat for telephoto reach. Its sensor-shift image stabilization helps steady the long lens, mitigating shake.

Samsung EX2F’s 3.3x zoom and slower frame rates are not well suited for distant, fast-moving wildlife shots.

Sports Photography

Neither excels here given their autofocus and frame rate limitations. Olympus’s tracking AF and faster burst give it a slight edge for casual sports snapshots, but serious sports shooters would feel constrained.

Street Photography

Samsung EX2F makes a better street companion: discreet, quick controls, better suppressing noise at high ISO, and a low-light friendly fast lens. Its articulating screen adds creative perspectives in cramped urban settings.

Olympus SZ-11’s bulkier zoom lens and slower operation weigh down its street credentials.

Macro Photography

Olympus offers impressive macro focusing down to 1 cm, giving substantial versatility for close-up details without extra gear.

Samsung’s macro capabilities aren’t explicitly highlighted and are less convenient compared to Olympus.

Night and Astro Photography

Samsung’s superior sensor and fast lens give it a clear advantage here. Cleaner images at ISO 800+ and manual exposure modes allow for long exposures critical for night sky shots.

Olympus’s sensor noise and slower lens aperture limit night shooting to well-lit scenes or flash.

Video Production

Samsung’s Full HD 1080p video with manual controls outclasses Olympus’s HD 720p offering without manual exposure and with lower compression efficiency.

For vloggers or casual filmmakers, the EX2F is the smarter pick.

Travel Photography

Olympus SZ-11’s unmatched zoom versatility is a strong selling point for travelers who want to capture everything from city streets to distant landscapes without swapping lenses.

Samsung EX2F, though less versatile zoom-wise, packs more control, better image quality, and a lightweight body that fits well in a carry-on.

Professional Usage

Neither is equipped for heavy-duty pro work, lacking ruggedness, advanced file format options (only Samsung supports RAW), and extensive controls. But for backup or casual documentation, Samsung’s RAW support and manual modes boost workflow flexibility.

Technical Deep-Dive: Autofocus and Stabilization

• Olympus relies on sensor-shift image stabilization. Though effective for the superzoom lens, it’s not optical lens-based stabilization, which can sometimes be less efficient during video recording and at extreme zoom.

• Samsung offers optical image stabilization (OIS), a critical advantage in low-light handheld shooting and video stabilization.

Autofocus on both is contrast detection-only, but Olympus’s face and subject tracking provide a mild advantage for dynamic scenes. Samsung compensates through manual focus with focus peaking, rarely found in compacts of this era.

Lens Ecosystem and Expandability

Neither camera supports interchangeable lenses, but Olympus’s larger zoom range reduces the need for multiple lenses.

Samsung does support external flash units via accessory hotshoe. Olympus lacks this option, restricting lighting control.

Storage and Connectivity Details

Both offer SD, SDHC, and SDXC card compatibility with single slots - standard in this category.

Samsung stands out with built-in wireless file transfer, a godsend before the era of ubiquitous WiFi in cameras.

Price-to-Performance and Value Judgement

At launch and even secondhand, Olympus SZ-11 tends to come in much cheaper (~$250 new) than the more enthusiast-focused Samsung EX2F (~$480).

If you’re a cheapskate or beginner after one camera to cover a vast zoom range and casual shooting, Olympus is compelling.

For buyers who prioritize image quality, manual control, and video capabilities and are willing to spend nearly twice as much, the Samsung EX2F rewards with more creative potential.

Olympus SZ 11 front Olympus SZ 11 screen back Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F screen back

Overall Scores and Genre-Specific Ratings

The imaging community benchmarked the Samsung EX2F with an overall DxO Mark score around 48, indicating solid image quality for a small sensor compact, especially in color depth and dynamic range.

Olympus SZ-11 lacks official DxO scores but is generally rated lower in image sharpness and noise control due to its sensor type and lens.

Delving deeper into genre-specific performance:

The Final Verdict: Which Camera Should You Choose?

To wrap up, here’s a summary of who each camera suits best:

Pick the Olympus SZ-11 if…

• You want an affordable, pocketable travel camera with a massive 20x zoom ready for wildlife, landscapes, and macro shots.
• You’re a casual user who prioritizes reach and ease of use over manual control.
• Video and advanced photography modes aren’t a priority.
• Battery life isn’t your main concern (carry spares).

Pick the Samsung EX2F if…

• You’re a photography enthusiast after a compact with serious creative control: manual exposure, fast lens, RAW shooting.
• Low-light portrait, street, or night photography are your main focus.
• You need solid Full HD video alongside stills.
• You value a better screen and connectivity features for quick sharing.

A Few Personal Anecdotes and Final Notes

In my travels and fieldwork testing both cameras side by side, I appreciated Olympus’s zoom power in scenarios like birdwatching hikes where reaching out to a fleeting subject mattered. However, when in dimly lit cafes or concerts, the Samsung’s brighter lens and cleaner images made my shots sing.

Manual controls on the EX2F nudged me to experiment and elevate my composition and exposure decisions rather than relying on auto modes.

If budget constraints loom large but you crave versatility, Olympus won’t disappoint your exploration instincts. But if you have the patience to fiddle with controls and yearn for image quality that pushes a compact sensor, Samsung offers a rewarding experience.

Overall, these cameras reflect the classic trade-offs of their category and era: superzoom versatility vs. compact quality and control. I hope this detailed comparison arms you with practical insight to make your next camera purchase a confident one.

Happy shooting, and may your images always tell great stories!

endarticle