Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus TG-310: A Detailed Comparison for Discerning Photographers

When evaluating compact cameras in the entry-level zoom and rugged categories, Olympus presents two noteworthy contenders from the early 2010s: the Olympus SZ-16 iHS, a small sensor superzoom model optimized for versatile telephoto reach; and the Olympus TG-310, a rugged, waterproof compact designed for active users seeking durability without sacrificing basic image quality. Both cameras - though somewhat dated today - offer unique value propositions within their respective niches.

Drawing from an extensive history of hands-on camera testing - covering sensor performance, autofocus reliability, image processing, and overall ergonomics - this comparison presents a meticulous evaluation between these two Olympus models. By aligning technical specifications and real-world usage scenarios across a spectrum of photography styles, this review aims to help enthusiasts and professionals alike discern which camera suits their specific creative goals and budget considerations.

First Impressions: Design, Size, and Handling

Physically, the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and the TG-310 occupy distinct stylistic and ergonomic domains, corresponding to their intended user profiles. The SZ-16 iHS measures approximately 108x70x40 mm and weighs in at 226 grams, placing it firmly in the compact superzoom category. Its relatively sizeable body accommodates a long 25-600 mm equivalent zoom lens, essential for varied telephoto needs, albeit resulting in a deeper and slightly heavier package.

Conversely, the TG-310 is more petite (96x63x23 mm) and lighter (155 grams), tailored for portability and robust outdoor use. Its stamped reputation as a waterproof camera is underscored by a body engineered to resist water, dust, shocks, and freezing temperatures. These traits contribute to its 23 mm thickness - a notable slimming compared to the SZ-16 iHS.

From an ergonomic standpoint, the SZ-16 iHS’s larger form factor affords button spacing and grip comfort superior to the TG-310’s more travel-friendly but compact frame. However, the TG-310 compensates with environmental seals and a build optimized for rugged conditions, targeting users whose adventures dictate camera survivability over extended handling comfort.

Top Control Layout: Operational Intuitiveness Versus Feature Abundance

Operating a camera smoothly often pivots on ergonomics and layout - areas where the SZ-16 iHS reveals a more feature-rich control scheme compared to the TG-310’s minimalist approach.

While neither camera offers manual focus knobs or exposure controls, the SZ-16 iHS provides a slightly more progressive shutter and zoom control interface, combined with a mode dial enabling quick access to a broader set of scene modes and exposure adjustments, which - despite lacking full manual exposure - allows constrained exposure creativity. This is complemented by an autofocus system boasting face detection and tracking in multi-area modes.

The TG-310, targeting casual and rugged use cases, maintains simplicity with fewer buttons and priorities on ease-of-use. This results in longer menu navigation to access advanced settings but keeps distractions minimal during active use. Importantly, its ruggedized buttons and seals reflect practical design choices for adverse conditions.

Digital Imaging Heart: Sensor Architecture, Resolution, and Image Quality

Both the SZ-16 iHS and TG-310 rely on 1/2.3-inch sensors, a common sizing in compact cameras during their release periods, yet the SZ-16 iHS uses a 16-megapixel CMOS sensor, while the TG-310 incorporates a 14-megapixel CCD sensor. This difference is foundational, influencing dynamic range, noise characteristics, and color rendering.

The CMOS sensor in the SZ-16 iHS benefits from more modern sensor technology, including faster readout speeds and improved noise handling - especially evident at ISO 400 and above. Its sensitivity extends to ISO 6400, accommodating dimmer lighting conditions more effectively. The TJG-310’s CCD sensor, while adequate at lower ISOs, maxes out at ISO 1600 and demonstrates higher noise and lower dynamic range in low-light scenarios.

In practical testing, the SZ-16 iHS delivers more vibrant colors with better tonal gradation, attributable to both its sensor and Olympus's iHS (Intelligent Hybrid System) processing engine, although the specific processor details remain unlisted. The TG-310 uses the TruePic III+ processor, triangle-tested for solid color fidelity but somewhat lacking in noise suppression at higher sensitivities.

Resolution-wise, the SZ-16 iHS pushes 16 megapixels (4608x3456 pixels), offering marginally higher detail potential versus the TG-310’s 14 megapixels (4288x3216 pixels). While the difference may not be drastic in print sizes limited to 8x10 inches, it becomes apparent when cropping or printing larger images.

Viewing Experience: LCD Screens and User Interface

Both cameras employ fixed TFT LCD screens rather than articulating or touch-sensitive displays; however, the SZ-16 iHS’s 3-inch screen with 460k-dot resolution provides a sharper, more inviting interface compared to the TG-310’s 2.7-inch display at 230k-dot resolution.

The higher-resolution screen on the SZ-16 iHS improves manual framing precision, crucial when working at extreme telephoto lengths, whereas the TG-310’s smaller, lower-res screen suffices for casual framing under bright daylight conditions but struggles under mixed lighting or for detailed composition tasks such as macro photography.

Neither model offers an electronic viewfinder (EVF), necessitating reliance on the rear screen for all composition and reviewing - a notable limitation in bright outdoor or sportive conditions.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed, Tracking, and Burst Modes

Both cameras utilize contrast-detection autofocus (AF) systems with face detection and tracking capabilities, though their continuous AF and burst shooting performances differ markedly due to hardware and processing distinctions.

The SZ-16 iHS supports continuous AF with multi-area tracking and face detection, enabling accurate focus locking in a variety of shooting conditions. However, its burst shooting rate is limited to 2 frames per second, which, while adequate for general shooting, falls short of capturing fast-paced action like sports or wildlife.

The TG-310’s autofocus also features face detection but lacks continuous AF, resulting in slower focus acquisition for moving subjects and burst shooting capped at 1 fps. This limitation aligns with its principal role as a rugged compact for casual shooting rather than rapid capture scenarios.

Real-world tests confirm that neither camera excels in high-speed photography, and users seeking advanced tracking capabilities or high frame rate sequences would find these options insufficient.

Zoom Versatility: Lens Specifications and Creative Flexibility

The lens system on each camera is fixed, yet their zoom ranges are defining features.

• SZ-16 iHS: Offers a hugely versatile 25-600 mm (24× optical zoom) with an aperture range of F3.0–6.9. This superzoom capacity caters to photographers who desire everything from wide-angle landscapes and portraits to distant wildlife or sports capture without swapping lenses.

• TG-310: Features a modest 28-102 mm (3.6× optical zoom) aperture F3.9–5.9 lens. While limited compared to the SZ-16 iHS, the TG-310 delivers adequate coverage for wide-angle travel shots and casual telephoto compositions.

The SZ-16 iHS's longer telephoto reach can introduce challenges related to image stabilization and atmospheric haze, but its built-in sensor-shift stabilization mitigates handshake issues. Conversely, the TG-310’s lens emphasizes compactness and durability, with macro capabilities down to 3 cm, enabling close-up shots - a notable advantage for enthusiasts of macro or detailed subject photography in challenging environments.

Image Stabilization and Low-Light Capabilities

Both cameras employ sensor-shift image stabilization, however, with differing effectiveness linked to sensor and lens design.

The SZ-16 iHS stabilizes images well across its extensive zoom range, crucial for handheld shots approaching 600 mm equivalent focal length. Its higher ISO tolerance enhances low-light shooting viability, although users must remain mindful of noise introduction at elevated settings (ISO 3200–6400).

The TG-310’s stabilization supports steadier handheld captures at the 28-102 mm range, but lower maximum ISO sensitivity (ISO 1600) limits its usefulness in dim conditions. Furthermore, the CCD sensor’s physical characteristics mean noise and dynamic range fall short of the SZ-16 iHS, making it less ideal for night scenes or astrophotography pursuits.

Video Functionality: Recording Quality and Usability

Video capabilities in both models are entry-level, with 720p HD recording at 30 fps as the maximum resolution:

• SZ-16 iHS records in MPEG-4 and H.264 formats, ensuring relatively efficient compression and decent playback compatibility, but lacks microphone or headphone jacks, limiting external audio options.

• TG-310 records videos in Motion JPEG, a format that produces large file sizes and inferior compression efficiency compared to H.264, impacting storage and editing workflows.

Neither camera offers 4K or even Full HD (1080p) capture, and video stabilization performance is constrained by sensor-shift technology without optical image stabilization. Given these limitations, video users seeking higher fidelity and professional audio-input capabilities will find both models wanting.

Olympus SZ 16 iHS front Olympus SZ 16 iHS screen back Olympus TG 310 front Olympus TG 310 screen back

Real-World Image Quality: Sample Shots and Practical Considerations

Testing under varied lighting and subject conditions reveals expected outcomes based on sensor and lens specs. The SZ-16 iHS produces sharper images with better dynamic range, recovering highlights and shadows more effectively, an advantage notably apparent in landscape and portrait shots.

Portraiture benefits from effective skin tone rendering thanks to face detection autofocus and the relatively fast F3.0 aperture at the wide-angle end, delivering fair subject isolation with gentle bokeh. However, at telephoto extremes, the slower maximum aperture (F6.9) limits background separation, demanding more light.

The TG-310 excels in macro and close-up photography, facilitated by its 3 cm macro range, and image colors remain pleasing but less nuanced. Portraits and landscapes display lower resolution detail and compressed tonal range, with visible noise creeping in at ISO 800 and above.

Specialized Photography Genres: Strengths and Limitations

Portrait Photography

• SZ-16 iHS: Better suited for portraits due to higher resolution, fuller zoom, and face-detection AF. Bokeh at longer focal lengths is limited but serviceable. Eye-detection not supported, requiring manual precision in focus point selection.

• TG-310: Macro mode enhances close-up detail on subjects, but limited zoom and sensor resolution curb portrait versatility.

Landscape Photography

• SZ-16 iHS: Superior dynamic range and resolution benefit wide outdoor scenes, although no weather sealing restricts usage in adverse conditions.

• TG-310: Waterproofing and dustproofing make it practical in challenging environments, but lower sensor performance limits landscape detail richness.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

• SZ-16 iHS: Long telephoto zoom useful for distant subjects but slow autofocus and 2 fps burst rate limit efficacy for fast action.

• TG-310: Zoom too short and burst rate too slow for meaningful sports or wildlife capture.

Street and Travel Photography

• SZ-16 iHS: Bulkier size and longer zoom may draw attention; moderate battery life (220 shots) affects all-day usability.

• TG-310: Compact, rugged, and portable with environmental sealing, ideal for all-weather street and travel photography, despite limited creative controls.

Macro and Night/Astro Photography

• TG-310: Macro performance favored due to close focusing distance.

• SZ-16 iHS: Performs better at night due to higher ISO capability but neither camera is optimized for astrophotography due to sensor size and noise levels.

Video and Professional Use

Both are unsuitable for demanding professional workflows, lacking RAW support, advanced video codecs, and external audio, but the SZ-16 iHS’s superior image quality may suffice for casual multimedia projects.

Durability and Environmental Resistance

The defining advantage of the TG-310 is its rugged construction:

• Waterproof (up to 10 feet/3 meters)
• Dustproof
• Shockproof (1.5-meter drop resistance)
• Freezeproof (-10°C/14°F rated)

This makes the TG-310 a compelling choice for outdoor adventurers. The SZ-16 iHS lacks any environmental sealing, constraining its deployment in inclement weather or physically challenging situations.

Battery Life and Storage

• SZ-16 iHS uses a LI-50B battery, achieving about 220 shots per charge, superior to the TG-310’s LI-42B battery rated at approximately 150 shots.

• Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards with single slots.

Consequently, the SZ-16 iHS offers longer operation between charges - a meaningful advantage during extended outings without power access.

Connectivity and Modern Features

Neither camera features advanced wireless connectivity such as Bluetooth or NFC. The TG-310 supports an Eye-Fi wireless card interface, which was innovative at its release but limited by today’s wireless sharing standards.

Both provide USB 2.0 connectivity and HDMI output for simple data transfer and playback on HDTVs.

Performance Summary and Ratings

The SZ-16 iHS's core strengths pivot around image quality, zoom versatility, and superior battery life, earning higher marks in imaging and general photography scores. However, it falls in handling and durability compared to the TG-310, which shines in environmental resistance and compactness but stumbles on performance metrics.

Which Olympus Camera Fits Your Photography Needs?

Final Thoughts: Balancing Versatility, Durability, and Image Quality

In summation, the Olympus SZ-16 iHS offers a compelling value proposition for photography enthusiasts focused on versatile zoom and decent image quality afforded by its 16 MP CMOS sensor, larger screen, and better battery endurance. Its strengths lie in controlled environments and general-purpose shooting, where image quality and telephoto reach compensate for the lack of environmental sealing.

By contrast, the Olympus TG-310 caters to photographers prioritizing durability and portability in harsh or unpredictable settings, with rugged features enabling use underwater, in dusty areas, and under freeze conditions - albeit at the cost of lower resolution, constrained zoom, and slower shooting responsiveness.

Choosing between these cameras hinges on photographic priorities. If zoom range, image quality, and battery life hold primacy, the SZ-16 iHS remains a noteworthy option, particularly on a budget. For adventurers requiring a resilient, waterproof compact that sacrifices some imaging finesse for toughness, the TG-310 remains an attractive pick.

This comprehensive comparison, grounded in authoritative testing experience and direct evaluation of every essential feature, should clarify how each Olympus camera stacks up to your photographic intent and workflow.

For full technical comparison tables, additional sample galleries, and real-life usage tips, feel free to explore our detailed database or consult Olympus’s official resources.

Thank you for trusting our expertise to guide your next camera investment.

End of comparison article.