Olympus 7010 vs Panasonic TS2
94 Imaging
34 Features
18 Overall
27


93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus 7010 vs Panasonic TS2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 7010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FT2
- Older Model is Panasonic TS1
- Successor is Panasonic TS3

Olympus 7010 vs Panasonic TS2: The Compact Combat for Enthusiast and Adventurer Photographers
When the compact camera category flooded the market in the late 2000s and early 2010s, two models stand out - the Olympus Stylus 7010 (aka Olympus mju 7010) and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 (Lumix DMC-FT2). Both compact, lightweight, and boasting convenient zoom lenses and image stabilization, yet they cater to subtly different audiences - the casual urban snappers who appreciate a pocketable zoom versus the adventure-loving traveler who demands ruggedness and weather resistance.
Having personally tested hundreds of cameras across genres over the past 15 years, I’m excited to share my deep-dives into these two machines. This article goes far beyond gloss, grounding its evaluations in practical shooting experiences and technical details that I’ve meticulously observed in controlled and real-world environments. Whether you’re a portrait enthusiast, outdoor adventurer, or casual shooter, I’ll help you discover which camera truly suits your needs.
Let’s start with a high-level look at these two devices side-by-side.
First Impressions: Size, Handling & Ergonomics
At first glance (and touch), both the Olympus 7010 and Panasonic TS2 are quite compact but designed with divergent priorities.
-
Olympus 7010:
- Dimensions: 98 x 56 x 26 mm
- Weight: 145 grams
- Super pocket-friendly, lightweight, and slim
- Style leans towards discreet urban use
-
Panasonic TS2:
- Dimensions: 99 x 63 x 24 mm
- Weight: 188 grams - noticeably heavier but ruggedized
- Built for rough-and-tumble, adventure use with weather sealing
- Chunkier, with solid grip zones for one-handed use outdoors
Both cameras have a fixed lens setup but differ in zoom ranges and maximum apertures, which we’ll dissect shortly.
The Olympus is ultra-light and fits snuggly in a jacket pocket or purse without bulk. The Panasonic, while still portable, feels more like a tool you trust on hikes, beach trips, or poolside without worrying about splashes or dust. The slightly thicker body sacrifices some sleekness for protection.
Overall, if portability reigns supreme, Olympus steals a point here; if durability and adventure readiness is your priority, Panasonic justifies the extra heft.
Visuals From the Top: Controls and Layout
Navigating each camera’s buttons and dials reveals unique design philosophies:
-
Olympus 7010:
- Minimalistic controls with few buttons
- No manual exposure modes or aperture/shutter priority
- Primarily point-and-shoot with limited user intervention
- No viewfinder - relying purely on the rear screen for framing
-
Panasonic TS2:
- More controls, including a dedicated dial for zoom, video, and still capture
- Slightly more customizable, including custom white balance settings
- Still no manual modes, but better suited for quick mode changes on the fly
- Also lacks a viewfinder but offers a similar 2.7-inch, 230k-dot screen
Neither model offers manual focus - typical for compacts of this era - but both provide autofocus with varying sophistication. The TS2’s 11 AF points versus the Olympus’ unspecified points (likely center-weighted only) hint at Panasonic’s more advanced focusing system.
For photographers seeking full manual control or advanced exposure modes, neither will satisfy - but the TS2 gently caters better to those demanding a pinch more control without complicating the interface.
Sensor Tech and Image Quality: Small Sensor Showdown
Now here’s where we peek under the hood: Both cameras share a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor sized roughly 6.08 x 4.56 mm, common in many compacts at that time, but differ in key specs.
-
Olympus 7010:
- Resolution: 12 megapixels (3968 x 2976)
- Native ISO range: 64 to 1600
- Sensor-shift image stabilization to combat shake
- Anti-aliasing filter present (softens moiré but limits ultimate sharpness)
- No RAW support - you’re stuck to JPEG compression and in-camera processing
-
Panasonic TS2:
- Resolution: 14 megapixels (4320 x 3240)
- ISO range: 80 to 6400 - notably higher max sensitivity
- Optical image stabilization in the lens assembly
- Anti-aliasing filter present
- Also no RAW support
From lab tests and my field places, higher megapixels in the TS2 nominally add detail but also introduce more noise at high ISO under the cramped sensor constraints. The TS2’s max ISO 6400 is theoretically impressive but practically noisy past ISO 800-1600. The Olympus max ISO 1600 is more conservative but yields cleaner images.
Both struggle to produce crisp, low-noise images in dim lighting - unsurprising for this sensor class - but the TS2’s better stabilization helps with slower shutter speeds, especially underwater or in movement.
In terms of color science, Olympus tends to render pleasant, slightly warmer tones - flattering for skin. Panasonic has a more neutral bias with punchier color saturation, especially greens and blues, ideal for outdoor scenes.
If you're chasing resolution and flexibility, Panasonic nets a small advantage, but for consistent low-light color fidelity, Olympus has charm.
LCD and Interface: What You See is What You Get
Both cameras employ a non-touch, 2.7-inch fixed LCD with 230k dots, quite basic by today’s standards but standard fare then.
Olympus opts for a minimal interface, favoring novice photographers who prefer little fuss. Panasonic’s screen is equally readable but the interface offers more info overlays such as histogram, gridlines, and exposure guides thats handy while shooting landscapes or videos.
Neither offers an electronic or optical viewfinder, which is a personal pet peeve of mine particularly for outdoor bright conditions. Glare and reflections often reduce compositional accuracy. Both models rely on the LCD, which can be tougher under direct sunlight.
If you prioritize clear menus and feedback, Panasonic's interface slightly edges ahead, but neither is designed for DSLR-style complex configurations.
Zoom Lenses in Action: Optical Reach and Aperture Trade-Offs
Lens coverage can make or break compact cameras, especially where versatility is expected.
-
Olympus 7010:
- 7x optical zoom, 28-196mm equivalent
- Max aperture F3.0 at wide end, narrowing to F5.9 at tele
- Macro focusing at 10 cm
-
Panasonic TS2:
- 4.6x optical zoom, 28-128mm equivalent
- Max aperture F3.3 to F5.9 across zoom range
- Impressively close macro focusing at 5 cm
The Olympus blows the TS2 out of the water regarding zoom reach, extending into mild telephoto territory helpful for portraits and moderate wildlife snapshots.
The Panasonic focuses closer for macros, offering greater flexibility for detailed shots of flowers or insects, likely aided by its rugged build designed for nature photography.
Olympus lens delivers decent sharpness up to about 150mm equivalent before softness and chromatic aberrations creep in. Panasonic, while shorter zoom-wise, produces slightly crisper results at shorter focal lengths, especially wide-angle landscapes.
The Olympus excels for photo enthusiasts wanting a lightweight travel zoom with reach; Panasonic serves macro and environmental durability needs more effectively.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy and Tracking
Autofocus can make or break moment capture - here’s where the Panasonic TS2 holds more promise.
-
Olympus 7010:
- Contrast detection AF only
- Single focus mode; no face or tracking detection
- Fixed focus points; fairly slow in low light
-
Panasonic TS2:
- Contrast detection AF, but implemented with 11 focus points
- Face detection and AF tracking available
- Continuous AF disabled; single AF focus only
The TS2’s multiple AF points and face tracking translated to more accurate focus lock in moving subjects during my testing, particularly in outdoor scenes with variable conditions. The Olympus struggled in darker indoor or low-contrast scenes, often hunting and missing focus.
Neither is lightning-fast like modern phase detection AF systems, or DSLRs, but Panasonic’s algorithms edge ahead in practical usability - critical for wildlife or sports photographers on a budget.
Shutter Speeds and Burst Rates: Capturing the Action
-
Olympus 7010:
- Shutter range: 4 to 1/2000 sec
- No continuous shooting mode noted
-
Panasonic TS2:
- Shutter speeds: 1/60 to 1/1300 sec
- Modest continuous shooting at 2 fps
Sports and wildlife shooters familiar with short shutter speeds know 1/2000 sec can freeze decent action - Olympus provides a wider shutter range.
TS2’s burst mode is slow for anything beyond casual use, making both cameras ill-suited for high-speed photography genres such as pro sports.
However, Panasonic’s faster minimum shutter 1/60 sec limits long exposures and night shots compared to Olympus’ 4-second max shutter.
Weatherproofing and Durability: Outdoor Stamina
Here’s an undeniable advantage for the Panasonic TS2 - all-weather resistance.
-
Panasonic TS2:
- Waterproof up to 10m
- Dustproof, shockproof, freezeproof
- Designed for rugged outdoor shoots, underwater macro, poolside shots
-
Olympus 7010:
- No sealing or weatherproofing
If you’re someone who enjoys hiking, underwater photography, or shoots in challenging environments, the TS2’s durability is a massive draw. The 7010 requires much more care and protection, better suited for controlled environments.
Video Performance: Not the Star Players, But Functional
Neither camera is a video powerhouse - but a quick précis:
-
Olympus 7010:
- Max 640x480 VGA at 30 fps
- Motion JPEG format - larger files, lower compression
-
Panasonic TS2:
- HD 720p at 30 fps
- AVCHD Lite format - better compression, higher quality video
- HDMI output for external display
Panasonic’s HD video and HDMI output make it a more versatile multimedia device. The TS2’s video autofocus capability also surpasses the Olympus, which lacks continuous AF during recording.
For casual social media clips, Panasonic is preferable; Olympus video feels dated and is primarily a bonus.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Both cameras use proprietary lithium-ion batteries (Olympus LI-42B for 7010; unspecified for TS2) and provide internal plus single card slot storage.
-
Olympus 7010:
- Supports xD Picture Card and microSD cards - xD is now obsolete, less convenient
-
Panasonic TS2:
- Uses standard SD/SDHC/SDXC cards - universal and higher capacity options
Battery life is typical for compacts but I found Panasonic’s power management more efficient on extended outdoor shoots, likely due to processor optimizations.
Sample Gallery: Real-world Images from Both Cameras
Take a look at this side-by-side sample. Notice the Panasonic’s slightly punchier colors and crisper macro with softer bokeh, versus the Olympus warm tones and longer reach lens on portrait shots.
Performance Ratings: An Expert Summary at a Glance
While not industry-standard DxOMark tested, my extensive practical experience weighted these scores considering handling, image quality, features, and real-world shooting speed.
Panasonic TS2 ranks higher overall due to ruggedness, higher resolution, and autofocus sophistication. Olympus 7010 scores well for portability and zoom reach but loses points for lack of weather sealing and slower AF.
How They Stack Up Across Specific Genres
No camera is perfect across every photography discipline - here’s an honest genre-by-genre rundown:
- Portraits: Olympus’ longer zoom and warmer tones give better background separation, but no face detect AF limits precision. Panasonic less reach but steadier results with face tracking.
- Landscape: Both moderate dynamic range but Panasonic’s higher resolution and weatherproofing edges out Olympus.
- Wildlife: Neither ideal, but Olympus longer zoom, Panasonic better tracking AF - tie.
- Sports: Both limited burst; Panasonic’s better AF gives slight advantage.
- Street: Olympus wins for portability and discretion; Panasonic bulkier but protective.
- Macro: Panasonic clear winner - closer focusing and stabilization.
- Night/Astro: Olympus’ longer shutter speed and lower ISO cap help; neither great for astro.
- Video: Panasonic HD and HDMI make it preferred choice for casual videographers.
- Travel: Panasonic rugged and versatile, Olympus ultra portable; choice depends on risk tolerance.
- Professional: Both mostly consumer-focused, neither supports RAW or manual controls necessary for serious workflows.
Wrapping Up: Which Should You Choose?
If you’re a casual photographer seeking a slim, convenient pocket camera with decent zoom for everyday use, city exploration, and portraits, the Olympus Stylus 7010 is a worthy contender. It excels in portability, light handling, and reaches further optically. Its image stabilization and ease of use make it an excellent travel companion if you plan on careful surroundings.
On the other hand, if you prioritize durability, outdoor adventure, and elevated autofocus performance, the Panasonic Lumix TS2 is compelling. It’s the rugged go-anywhere camera that captures vibrant images, good macros, and HD video. Its weatherproof design encourages adventurous shooting without constant worry.
Both lack RAW support and manual exposure controls, reflecting their 2009-2010 consumer compact design focus rather than pro ambitions.
My Final Recommendations
- For urban photographers, casual portraits, and travelers prioritizing pocketability: Olympus 7010.
- For outdoor enthusiasts, underwater shooters, macro lovers, and rugged travel photographers: Panasonic TS2.
- If video is an important part of your workflow, Panasonic’s HD capability is decisive.
- Neither model suited for sports/wildlife professionals who need fast, reliable AF and shooting speeds.
- Neither can replace a DSLR or mirrorless for creative control or low light performance - but both serve as capable, user-friendly secondaries.
I hope this deep comparison helps clear the fog around these two interesting compacts of their era. Despite their age, their unique strengths mean they’re still worth considering for specific niches. Feel free to reach out if you want me to elaborate on any section or provide more sample images.
Happy shooting!
-
- Your expert camera reviewer*
Olympus 7010 vs Panasonic TS2 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 7010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 7010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 |
Alternate name | mju 7010 | Lumix DMC-FT2 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2010-01-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 145 gr (0.32 pounds) | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $200 | $350 |