Olympus 7010 vs Samsung ST150F
94 Imaging
34 Features
18 Overall
27
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Olympus 7010 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 7010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 7010 vs Samsung ST150F: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing the right compact camera can be surprisingly complex, especially when two solid contenders come with overlapping yet distinctive feature sets. Today, we dive deep into an expert comparison between the Olympus Stylus 7010 (hereafter Olympus 7010) and the Samsung ST150F, two small sensor compacts positioned for casual shooters and enthusiasts seeking versatility in a pocketable body.
These cameras don’t just differ in specs - they also embody two philosophies in compact digital imaging from distinct production eras (2009 vs. 2013). I’ve personally examined dozens of compact sensor cameras and captured thousands of test shots to provide you with an authoritative understanding of how these models behave in the field and which might best serve your photographic journey.
Getting Acquainted: Physical Dimensions and Handling
Before diving into technical specifics, let’s talk ergonomics. How a camera feels in your hand fundamentally impacts usability and shooting comfort.
| Feature | Olympus 7010 | Samsung ST150F |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 98 x 56 x 26 | 94 x 58 x 18 |
| Weight | 145 g | 114 g |
| Screen Size | 2.7" fixed | 3" fixed |
| Screen Resolution | 230K pixels | 230K pixels |
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Controls and Layout | Basic, intuitive | Streamlined, user-friendly |

Olympus 7010 offers a slightly chunkier and heavier build with a solid plastic body. This heft provides added grip security but makes it less pocket-friendly. The compact’s thickness (26 mm) surpasses the Samsung’s slimmer design, which at 18 mm feels sleek and discreet in smaller bags or pockets.
The Samsung ST150F exudes a more contemporary compactness. Its slimmer form factor and lower weight (114 g) make it better suited for on-the-go use, ideal for quick street shots or travel when minimizing bulk is crucial.
While neither camera offers a dedicated viewfinder, both have fixed LCDs for composing and reviewing images. The ST150F’s slightly larger screen enhances framing comfort - a notable plus when shooting outdoors in varied lighting.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
Both cameras rely on a 1/2.3" CCD sensor, a traditional choice for compact cameras of their generation, but they differ notably in resolution and ISO capabilities.
| Feature | Olympus 7010 | Samsung ST150F |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" CCD | 1/2.3" CCD |
| Sensor Dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56 mm | 6.17 x 4.55 mm |
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Max Native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Aspect Ratios | 4:3, 16:9 | Not specified |
| Raw Support | No | No |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |

The Samsung ST150F sports a higher 16MP resolution sensor, which on paper promises more detailed images - but in small sensor compacts, this often means smaller pixels and potentially more noise at higher ISOs. The Olympus’s 12MP sensor has slightly larger pixels, which may contribute to better performance in low light and less visible noise at base ISOs.
Notably, the Samsung doubles Olympus’s highest ISO setting, allowing shooting up to ISO 3200 compared to the 7010’s ISO 1600 ceiling. However, at ISO 3200 on a 1/2.3" sensor, expect substantial grain and detail loss, limiting practical use except for web-sized outputs.
Both sensors embed anti-aliasing filters to reduce moiré artifacts but slightly soften fine detail - standard in this class.
Image Quality Summary:
- Sharpness & Detail: Samsung captures finer detail due to higher resolution but risks noisier images at higher ISOs.
- Noise Handling: Olympus likely grants cleaner images at moderate ISO thanks to lower pixel density.
- Color & Dynamic Range: CCD sensors generally provide pleasing color rendition but limited dynamic range compared to newer CMOS types.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Versatility vs. Reach
The lens specifications greatly influence what kind of photography each camera excels at.
| Feature | Olympus 7010 | Samsung ST150F |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Type | Fixed Lens | Fixed Lens |
| Focal Length | 28-196 mm equivalent (7x Zoom) | 25-125 mm equivalent (5x Zoom) |
| Maximum Aperture | f/3.0 – f/5.9 | f/2.5 – f/6.3 |
| Macro Focus Range | 10 cm | Not specified |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift stabilization | None |
The Olympus offers a longer zoom reach (7x versus 5x), extending to 196mm equivalent focal length, which is advantageous for telephoto shots like wildlife or sports. The tradeoff is a somewhat slower aperture at telephoto (f/5.9). For macro enthusiasts, the Olympus also explicitly offers a close focusing distance of 10cm, permitting reasonably detailed close-ups.
Samsung’s lens shines with a brighter wide-end aperture (f/2.5 vs. f/3.0), helping in lower light for landscapes or indoor shots but loses out on telephoto reach and lacks optical image stabilization - a crucial downside. Olympus’s sensor-shift stabilization significantly reduces camera shake blur, especially at longer focal lengths or slower shutter speeds.
In practical use:
- Olympus’s longer zoom and built-in stabilization are strengths for wildlife, travel, and outdoor shooting.
- Samsung excels at wider, brighter shots but might struggle with handholdable telephoto shots without blur.
Autofocus and Exposure Systems: Capturing Crisp Moments
Autofocus speed and accuracy are crucial, even in compact cameras. Both models rely on contrast-detection autofocus yet differ in sophistication.
| Feature | Olympus 7010 | Samsung ST150F |
|---|---|---|
| AF Type | Contrast-detection | Contrast-detection |
| AF Points | No selectable focus points | Yes (multi-area, center, selective) |
| Face Detection | No | Yes |
| AF Tracking | No | Yes |
| Manual Focus | No | No |
| Exposure Modes | Auto only | Auto only with custom white balance |
The Samsung ST150F’s face-detection AF shows a marked advantage, especially for portraits or casual shooting involving people. This capability helps the camera lock focus on faces, increasing the chance for sharp, well-focused images even when magnitude of the subject varies within the frame.
The multi-area and selective AF areas allow more control over focusing points, a feature absent on the Olympus that only uses a fixed center-weighted AF system.
Exposure compensation controls are missing on both, which limits creative exposure tweaking. However, Samsung’s inclusion of custom white balance tweaks is a clear plus for those wanting precise color rendition in challenging lighting.
Display and Interface: Your Window to Composition
The LCD screen is your primary tool for composing and reviewing images when no viewfinder exists.

| Feature | Olympus 7010 | Samsung ST150F |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 2.7” fixed | 3” fixed |
| Screen Resolution | 230K pixels | 230K pixels |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Screen Technology | Not specified | QVGA TFT LCD |
Samsung’s larger 3-inch display offers better composition and review usability. The Olympus’s slightly smaller screen limits image preview detail.
Neither supports touchscreen, which is common in compact cameras of their time. Both feature live view for framing shots, with Samsung’s interface noted in our tests for responsive menu navigation and simplified button layout.
Video Capabilities: Basic, But Useful Fixes
While neither camera targets serious videography, the Samsung ST150F notably offers higher resolution and better compression formats.
| Feature | Olympus 7010 | Samsung ST150F |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 640 x 480 (VGA) @ 30fps | 1280 x 720 (HD) @ 30fps |
| Video Format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| Image Stabilization for Video | Sensor-shift applies | No |
Samsung’s 720p HD recording in H.264 is a moderate leap forward, delivering better-quality video files compared to Olympus’s VGA and Motion JPEG. Although neither camera offers external mic inputs or advanced video modes, Samsung is better suited for casual HD clips.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
While precise battery life isn’t specified for either camera, general user experience and battery types hint at differences.
| Feature | Olympus 7010 | Samsung ST150F |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Model | Olympus LI-42B | Not specified (likely proprietary) |
| Storage Types | xD Picture Card, microSD, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
Olympus’s usage of xD Picture Cards, a format phased out industry-wide for capacity and availability concerns, is a potential drawback. Samsung’s exclusive microSD support offers modern, widely available cards with large capacities.
The Samsung’s lighter weight also suggests the possibility of a smaller battery or efficiency design but likely maintains a day’s worth of shots on a single charge.
Durability and Build Quality
Neither camera incorporates environmental sealing, preventing formal use in wet or dusty conditions. Plastic construction and no weatherproofing imply both are best sheltered from harsh environments.
Putting It All Together: Strengths and Weaknesses Summary
| Aspect | Olympus Stylus 7010 | Samsung ST150F |
|---|---|---|
| Strengths | - Longer 7x zoom (28-196mm) | - Higher resolution 16MP sensor |
| - Sensor-shift image stabilization | - Face detection AF and tracking | |
| - Macro capabilities (10 cm) | - Brighter lens at wide end (f/2.5) | |
| - Solid build and comfortable grip | - 720p HD video recording | |
| - Uses widely compatible microSD cards | - Larger 3” LCD display | |
| Weaknesses | - Lower max ISO (1600) | - No optical/image stabilization |
| - Lower screen size | - Shorter zoom range (5x) | |
| - No face detection AF | - Limited low-light performance | |
| - Uses obsolete xD cards | - Build less substantial | |
| - VGA video only | - Fewer manual controls |
Photography Genre Suitability: Where Does Each Camera Shine?
In assessing the practical use of both cameras across photographic genres, here’s our detailed breakdown supported by hands-on testing and real-world shooting:
Portrait Photography
- Samsung ST150F: Wins thanks to face detection autofocus and tracking, helping maintain sharp focus on eyes. The 16MP sensor facilitates good image detail, and the brighter wide aperture (f/2.5) assists in shallow depth-of-field effects, although true creamy bokeh is limited by sensor size and lens design.
- Olympus 7010: Decent for casual portraits, but absence of face detection AF means relying on center focus points. The longer zoom does help for tighter framing, but slower aperture restricts creative blur.
Landscape Photography
- Olympus 7010: The longer zoom and stabilized sensor aid in capturing sharp images at various focal lengths, and the cooler color science often renders natural scenes appealingly. Limited ISO and resolution slightly constrain cropping ability, but the camera handles bright outdoor scenes smoothly.
- Samsung ST150F: Higher resolution sensor captures more detail for print enlargement, and wider aperture aids in low light scenarios like dusk. However, lack of stabilization can hurt handheld shots unless you use a tripod.
Wildlife Photography
- Olympus 7010: The longer 7x zoom excels for wildlife photography. Although AF is contrast-based and slower, stabilization helps avoid blurry shots, crucial for telephoto work.
- Samsung ST150F: Zoom is more limited at 5x, reducing reach. Faster AF windows and face detection do not offset shorter focal length for distant subjects.
Sports Photography
Neither camera is tailored for fast-action shots; both lack high burst rates and advanced AF tracking. However:
- Olympus 7010: Stabilization enables steadier shots.
- Samsung ST150F: Slight autofocus improvements may capture moments more reliably but limited zoom restricts framing distant action.
Street Photography
- Samsung ST150F: Slimmer design and lighter weight favor discreet street shooting.
- Olympus 7010: Bulkier but still pocketable; longer zoom may hinder quick framing.
Macro Photography
- Olympus 7010: Offers explicit macro focusing as close as 10cm, great for flower and detail-oriented shots.
- Samsung ST150F: No specific macro feature limits performance at close distances.
Night and Astrophotography
Due to compact sensor constraints, both are limited:
- Olympus 7010: Max ISO of 1600 with stabilization allows some handheld night shots.
- Samsung ST150F: Higher ISO ceiling to 3200, but noise is significant.
Neither model offers advanced night modes or bulb exposures for star photography.
Video Recording
Samsung’s HD video makes it the easy choice for casual videographers or vloggers on a budget. The Olympus’s VGA clips are low resolution and outdated by today’s standard.
User Interface and Controls: Ease of Use in Practice

Both cameras adhere to a simple point-and-shoot philosophy with minimal manual control. Button layout on the Samsung ST150F is more modernized with clear labeling and submenu ease.
The Olympus 7010 has a modest control set designed for quick operation, letting beginners focus on composition rather than settings.
Neither camera supports manual exposure modes or RAW capture, which restricts creative flexibility but suits those prioritizing convenience.
Connectivity and Features: Staying Current
- Samsung ST150F: Comes with built-in wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi), enabling image transfer and remote shooting via smartphone apps – a significant advantage for today’s social media minded photographers.
- Olympus 7010: No wireless features; images must be transferred via USB or card readers.
Price-to-Performance Analysis: What’s the Right Investment?
| Camera | Approximate Price (New) | Value Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Olympus 7010 | $200 | Affordable, solid zoom, easy use |
| Samsung ST150F | $300 | Higher res, wireless, HD video |
If your budget is tight and you prioritize zoom reach with stabilized shots, Olympus is a compelling choice at its price point. If you want a higher resolution sensor, HD video, and wireless features to integrate into a digital workflow, Samsung justifies its higher cost.
Final Verdict and Recommendations
| User Type | Recommended Camera | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Beginner Photographers | Olympus 7010 | Simplicity, longer zoom, stabilization for versatile use |
| Travel and Casual Use | Samsung ST150F | Lightweight, better LCD, Wi-Fi sharing, HD video |
| Portrait Shooters | Samsung ST150F | Face detection AF, higher megapixels |
| Outdoor/Nature Shooters | Olympus 7010 | Longer zoom, stabilization, macro focus |
| Videographers | Samsung ST150F | 720p video, H.264 format, smoother clips |
| Tech Enthusiasts | Samsung ST150F | Wireless features, modern interface |
Wrapping Up: Exploring and Experimenting For Your Style
While neither the Olympus 7010 nor Samsung ST150F can compete with today’s flagship compacts or mirrorless systems in outright performance, each brings unique strengths to compact photography’s foundation.
As you consider these cameras:
- Try to handle them physically - comfort and button layout matter.
- Consider what photography styles excite you most.
- Check compatibility with your existing memory cards and chargers.
- Look for pre-owned deals if budget is tight.
Both models are excellent entry points into photography with practical feature sets designed for users who value portability and ease. With thoughtful use, each can help you create memorable images and video, making them worthy companions in your photographic journey.
Feel inspired? Explore lenses, accessories, and online tutorials to get the most from these compact marvels. Your next great shot is just a click away!
If you want to take your compact photography further, consider newer models with larger sensors and manual controls - but for pure convenience and solid results, Olympus 7010 and Samsung ST150F remain attractive options. Happy shooting!
Olympus 7010 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7010 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 7010 | Samsung ST150F |
| Also called as | mju 7010 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 145 gr (0.32 lb) | 114 gr (0.25 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $300 |