Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Announced February 2019
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and FZ1000 II (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 II (1") feature different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 9000 was revealed 10 years before the FZ1000 II and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the 9000 matches up versus the FZ1000 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
9000 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus 9000
FZ1000 II | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2019 | May 2009 | More recent by 118 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1010k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ1000 II
9000 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 comes with exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ1000 II has sizing of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") having a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
See the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the 9000 vs the FZ1000 II.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and FZ1000 II is 92 and 55 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The graphic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and FZ1000 II.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 9000 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will offer you extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Also referred to as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2019-02-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 pounds) | 808g (1.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $300 | $898 |