Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Announced June 2014
- Successor is Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic FZ1000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 9000 was released 6 years earlier than the FZ1000 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the 9000 matches up vs the FZ1000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FZ1000
9000 | FZ1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus 9000
FZ1000 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2014 | May 2009 | More modern by 61 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ1000
9000 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 comes with outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has specifications of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic FZ1000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the 9000 and the FZ1000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and FZ1000 is 92 and 55 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The image below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and FZ1000.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 9000 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic FZ1000 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 831 gr (1.83 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $800 |