Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS40
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Portability
90 Imaging
43 Features
58 Overall
49
90 Imaging
43 Features
58 Overall
49
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS40 Key Specs
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 240g - 111 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ60
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS35
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS45
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS40 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS40, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and ZS40 (18MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was revealed 5 years before the ZS40 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the 9000 matches up vs the ZS40 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS40 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Panasonic ZS40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic ZS40
| 9000 | ZS40 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS40 over the Olympus 9000
| ZS40 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 56 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS40
| 9000 | ZS40 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS40 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 offers exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS40 has proportions of 111mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS40 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the 9000 against the ZS40.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and ZS40 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS40 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and ZS40.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Panasonic ZS40 to deliver more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus 9000
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZS40
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
manual focus
decent megapixels (18MP)
includes face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic ZS40 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competitors (225g)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (240g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS40 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus 9000 Travel photography info
Panasonic ZS40 Travel photography info
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
long zoom (280mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (225g)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
lighter than competitors in class (240g)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (720mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic ZS40 Landscape photography factors
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS40 as a Vlogging camera
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (240g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS40 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 |
| Alternate name | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-TZ60 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 6.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 240g (0.53 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 64 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $450 |