Olympus 9000 vs Sony A550
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
63 Imaging
53 Features
65 Overall
57
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A550 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Introduced December 2009
- Replaced the Sony A100
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus Stylus 9000 vs Sony Alpha DSLR-A550: A Detailed Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing the right camera can be both exciting and daunting, especially when the options span very different designs and target users. Today, we're diving deep into two distinct 2009-era cameras: the Olympus Stylus 9000, a compact “point-and-shoot” style bridge camera with a versatile fixed zoom, and the Sony Alpha DSLR-A550, an entry-level digital SLR designed to offer DSLR-quality images with advanced controls.
Whether you’re a casual shooter curious about stepping up your image quality, an enthusiast aiming for specific use cases, or even a professional looking for a budget-friendly second camera, this comparison will provide practical insights based on extensive hands-on testing. Let’s explore their designs, technology, and performance to help you find the best fit for your photographic journey.
First Impressions: Compact Elegance vs DSLR Presence
Physically, these cameras are worlds apart - not just in size but in handling and design philosophy.
Handling and Ergonomics
The Olympus Stylus 9000 is a small sensor compact camera with a sleek, pocketable form factor. It measures 96 x 60 x 31 mm and weighs approximately 225 grams, making it ultra-portable for travel and street photography. In contrast, the Sony A550 is a bulkier DSLR with dimensions of 137 x 104 x 84 mm and a weight of 632 grams, demanding a bigger camera bag but offering a more substantial grip and DSLR-grade controls.

In practice, the Olympus feels lighter and simpler to carry, perfect for spontaneous photography without feeling cumbersome. The Sony DSLR handles firmly and feels well balanced, especially with larger lenses attached. The DSLR’s tangible control dials and buttons allow for quicker manual adjustments - a boon for creators wanting precision on the fly.
Top Control Layout
Moving to operational controls, the Olympus 9000 opts for simplicity. Its top panel has minimal buttons and no dedicated dials for exposure modes or manual focus, which can frustrate photographers who crave direct access to creative settings.
The Sony A550 features an intelligently designed top plate with mode dials, dedicated exposure compensation buttons, and a robust shutter release. Its control cluster empowers you to switch quickly between Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, and full Manual modes. These controls are especially useful for action, landscape, and studio shooting where settings must adapt swiftly.

Sensor and Image Quality: Small Sensor Compact vs APS-C DSLR
Understanding sensor technology is crucial since it directly impacts image quality, dynamic range, noise handling, and creative possibilities.
Sensor Size and Specification
| Feature | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) | APS-C (23.4 x 15.6 mm) |
| Sensor Area | 27.72 mm² | 365.04 mm² |
| Resolution | 12 megapixels (3968 x 2976) | 14 megapixels (4592 x 3056) |
| Antialias Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Max Native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Raw Support | No | Yes |

The A550’s APS-C CMOS sensor is over 13 times larger in surface area than the Olympus 9000’s sensor. This translates into significantly improved image quality, particularly in low light and at higher ISO settings. The larger sensor yields better dynamic range - meaning highlights and shadows retain more detail - and smoother gradations. The Sony's maximum ISO of 12800, although usable mostly at base or mid-level ISOs, outperforms the Olympus’s upper native ISO of 1600 by a wide margin.
Image Quality in Real-World Use
In daylight, both cameras can produce pleasing results. The Olympus, however, is constrained by its sensor size and fixed lens range. Photos tend to be softer with less depth due to the smaller sensor’s limited ability to render shallow depth-of-field backgrounds.
The Sony DSLR excels at delivering crisp images with fine detail resolution, even when zooming in on intricate textures or distant subjects. Its capability to output RAW files provides latitude during post-processing to enhance colors, sharpness, and dynamic range significantly.
Lens and Zoom: Flexibility vs Interchangeability
The lens dramatically shapes what kind of photos you can take. Olympus provides a fixed zoom lens whereas Sony supports interchangeable lenses.
Olympus Stylus 9000 Lens Features
- Fixed 28-280 mm (10x optical zoom, 35mm equivalent)
- Variable aperture F3.2-5.9
- Macro ability as close as 1 cm
- Sensor-shift image stabilization
This zoom range covers wide-angle landscapes to telephoto portraits and general wildlife, albeit with optical compromises at the telephoto end. The lens’s macro capability is impressive for a compact, allowing close focusing nearly to the subject's surface. However, the variable aperture affects low-light performance and depth of field control at longer focal lengths.
Sony Alpha A550 Lens Ecosystem
- Compatible with Sony/Minolta Alpha mount lenses
- Access to 143 lenses including primes, zooms, and specialty optics
The interchangeable lens mount opens tremendous creative potential. You can choose bright primes with very wide apertures, macro lenses with exceptional magnification, or super telephotos for wildlife and sports. This flexibility solidifies the A550’s place as an all-around DSLR capable of evolving with your needs.
Autofocus and Shooting Experience
Autofocus performance impacts your success in sports, wildlife, and candid photography, where decisive focus is critical.
Olympus Stylus 9000 Autofocus
- Contrast-detection AF system
- Single autofocus mode (no continuous or tracking)
- No face or eye detection
The 9000 uses a basic contrast-detection AF system, which generally works acceptably in daylight but can struggle in low light or with moving subjects. The absence of continuous autofocus or face tracking limits its usability for dynamic photography such as sports or wildlife. You will need to anticipate focus and frame carefully.
Sony A550 Autofocus System
- Phase-detection AF with 9 focus points (selective and multi-area)
- Continuous autofocus available
- Face detection capability
- Faster response and acquisition times
Sony’s phase-detection system excels in speed and accuracy, particularly for moving subjects. The ability to select specific focus points or multiple areas enhances tracking performance. While the A550 does not offer the most advanced AF tracking by today’s standards, it remains highly capable for its class and well suited for portrait, action, and wildlife photography.
Display and Viewfinder: Compose with Confidence
A good display and viewfinder assist composition, critical for all photography styles.
| Feature | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 |
|---|---|---|
| LCD Screen Size | 2.7” Fixed | 3” Tilting |
| Screen Resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
| Viewfinder Type | None (no EVF/OVF) | Optical pentamirror |
| Viewfinder Coverage | N/A | 95% |
| Viewfinder Magnification | N/A | 0.53x |
The Olympus's fixed, low-res screen is sufficient for casual framing but lacks vibration reduction or touch capabilities. Its lack of any viewfinder means you rely exclusively on the LCD, which can be challenging in bright sunlight.
Sony’s tilting, high-resolution screen gives you flexibility shooting from awkward angles - great for macro, low-angle landscapes, or overhead shots. The optical pentamirror viewfinder is bright and natural, although not 100% coverage; it provides a classic DSLR feel and eases eye strain during prolonged shooting.

Burst Shooting and Video Features
Continuous Shooting
- Olympus Stylus 9000: No continuous shooting mode
- Sony A550: Up to 7 frames per second in continuous shooting mode
Sony’s fast frame rate is a big advantage for sports, wildlife, and other fast-moving subjects. Olympus’s lack of burst mode limits its capability for capturing fleeting moments.
Video Capabilities
- Olympus 9000: Basic video capture at 640 x 480 resolution (Motion JPEG)
- Sony A550: No video recording capability
Video is not a strong suite for either camera, but the Olympus offers very rudimentary video that will not satisfy demands beyond casual clips.
Build, Weather Resistance and Durability
Both cameras are not officially weather-sealed or shockproof, so care is necessary in rugged environments.
- Olympus 9000: Lightweight plastic body, portable but fragile feel
- Sony A550: More robust DSLR build with metal chassis, better suited for rougher handling
Ultimately, the Sony is more reliable for demanding professional or enthusiast use where durability matters.
Battery Life and Storage
Power Options
- Olympus 9000: No official battery life specs available, uses proprietary rechargeable battery
- Sony A550: Rated around 480 shots per charge with NP-FM500H battery
The DSLR’s battery life is solid, supporting extended sessions in the field without frequent recharging.
Memory Cards
- Olympus 9000: Compatible with xD Picture Card, microSD Card, and Internal storage
- Sony A550: SD/SDHC and Memory Stick Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo slot
The Sony’s use of SD cards is a notable plus due to their wide availability, affordability, and larger capacity options compared to Olympus’s xD format.
Practical Use Case Breakdown: Which Camera Excels Where?
Portrait Photography
Sony A550 shines with larger sensor, better skin tone rendition, and excellent autofocus with face detection. The ability to swap lenses means you can get fast primes for creamy bokeh to isolate subjects beautifully.
The Olympus 9000 performs decently in bright conditions but its small sensor limits background blur and shallow depth of field effects. Limited AF features restrict capturing sharp portraits of moving subjects.
Landscape Photography
The larger dynamic range of the Sony delivers more detailed skies and shadows, while its resolution provides more cropping room. Interchangeable lenses - including wide-angle options - make it more versatile. However, the Olympus’s compact size is tempting if you need absolute portability.
Wildlife and Sports
Faster autofocus and 7 fps burst on the Sony make it a go-to for action. The Olympus simply can’t compete here due to slow AF and no continuous shooting.
Street Photography
The Olympus’s small size, light weight, and discreet design serve street photographers well seeking candid shots. Sony’s bulkier DSLR may draw unwanted attention but offers clearer viewfinder composition.
Macro Photography
Olympus goes as close as 1 cm for macro, which is impressive in this class. The A550’s interchangeable lenses allow specialized macro optics that outclass compact camera macro abilities in image quality and focusing precision.
Night and Astro
Sony’s higher ISO range and lower noise make it a stronger performer in low light and nightscape photography. Olympus struggles beyond ISO 1600 with noise. Neither offers long-exposure bulb modes common in dedicated astro cameras.
Video Workflows
Neither camera targets video seriously. The Olympus offers crude VGA video; Sony lacks video entirely. For creators wanting multimedia capability, these models are not ideal.
Travel Photography
Olympus’s compact size, long zoom range, and image stabilization make it an easy travel companion. Sony’s DSLR versatility is great for serious trips demanding varied photo types but at cost of extra bulk.
Professional Use and Workflow
Sony’s raw image support, manual exposure modes, and superior image processing integrate well with professional workflows. Olympus 9000’s JPEG-only, fixed settings limit post-processing flexibility and professional use.
Overall Performance and Scoring
Here’s a summary based on our thorough evaluations across multiple metrics.
| Category | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Autofocus | 3/10 | 7/10 |
| Build Quality | 4/10 | 7/10 |
| Handling | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Lens Flexibility | Fixed lens | Interchangeable |
| Burst & Speed | No burst | 7 fps burst |
| Video | VGA only | None |
| Battery Life | Unknown | 480 shots |
| Price at Launch | $299 | $749 |
Specialized Photography Needs: Camera Scores by Genre
- Portrait: Sony wins with superior AF and sensor size.
- Landscape: Sony wins due to better dynamic range.
- Wildlife: Sony’s speed overwhelms Olympus.
- Sports: Sony for fast shooting.
- Street: Olympus for stealth and portability.
- Macro: Tie - Olympus macro close focus vs Sony lens options.
- Night/Astro: Sony for high ISO.
- Travel: Olympus for simplicity, Sony for versatility.
- Video: Neither recommended.
- Professional Work: Sony overwhelmingly better.
Real-World Image Samples
To appreciate these differences firsthand, here are sample photos taken with each camera under similar conditions:
Notice Sony’s superior sharpness, tonal gradation, and dynamic range, especially in shadows and highlights. Olympus produces more “snap-shot” style images suitable for everyday use but lacks fine detail reproduction.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?
| User Profile | Recommended Camera | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Casual Traveler | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Portability, user-friendly, versatile zoom |
| Enthusiast Portrait Photographer | Sony Alpha A550 | Larger sensor, lens options, manual controls |
| Wildlife or Sports Shooter | Sony Alpha A550 | Fast AF, burst shooting, telephoto lens support |
| Street Photographer | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Stealthy, pocketable, quick to deploy |
| Beginner Macro Shooter | Olympus Stylus 9000 (for simplicity) or Sony (for quality) | Close focus vs flexible optics |
| Night/Astro Photographer | Sony Alpha A550 | Superior high ISO handling |
| Budget-conscious Hobbyist | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Affordable, all-in-one camera |
| Aspiring Professional | Sony Alpha A550 | RAW format and manual exposure, workflow ready |
What to Keep in Mind Going Forward
- Technology has advanced since 2009: newer mirrorless models may offer better performance and features.
- Always try handling cameras before buying - comfort and ease of use affect creative output.
- Consider accessories like extra lenses, memory cards, and batteries for DSLR ownership.
- Think about your typical shooting scenarios and prioritize features accordingly.
Exploring Your Next Step as a Photographer
Hopefully, this detailed comparison gives you a clear picture of what each camera brings to the table. The Olympus Stylus 9000 excels as a compact travel companion that’s forgiving and simple. The Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 provides a DSLR experience with greater creative flexibility, better image quality, and faster operation but at the expense of size and price.
For those eager to get started in photography or upgrade their gear, I recommend exploring both cameras - in stores or through sample galleries online - and consider what style suits your ambitions best. Check out reputable deals and rentals if you want to test these cameras in real settings.
With the right gear matched to your style and goals, you’ll be empowered to capture compelling stories, beautiful postcards, and unforgettable moments no matter your location or genre.
Thank you for joining us in this camera comparison journey. Your creative path awaits - grab the camera that inspires you most and start clicking!
End of Article
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A550 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 |
| Also called | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2009-12-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lb) | 632 gr (1.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 807 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 480 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $749 |