Olympus Stylus SH-2 vs Olympus Stylus Tough 8010: A Hands-On Compact Camera Showdown

Choosing a compact camera can often feel like navigating a maze of glossy brochures and hyperbolic marketing slogans. Having tested thousands of cameras throughout my 15+ years behind the lens, I’ve learned there’s no substitute for getting under the skin of a camera’s real-world strengths and weaknesses. Today, I’m unboxing two intriguing Olympus compacts from notable - but quite different - eras and categories: the Olympus Stylus SH-2, a 2015 superzoom marvel, and the Olympus Stylus Tough 8010, a rugged waterproof shooter from 2010.

If you’re weighing these small-sensor Olympuses in search of your next travel buddy, street camera, or casual enthusiast sidekick, this 2,500-word deep dive is for you. We’ll unravel everything from sensor tech to ergonomics, autofocus wizardry to video chops - and slice through the specs jungle with a practiced eye. Ready? Let’s zoom in.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Intuitive Design

Before plowing into the pixels and processors, size and handling play a massive role for compact camera buyers. Carrying a bulky camera can kill spontaneity - and trust me, the best camera is the one in your pocket when the moment strikes.

At first glance, the SH-2 and Tough 8010 share the “compact” badge, but they couldn’t be more different in physique or philosophy. The SH-2 measures 109 x 63 x 42 mm and weighs 271 grams - plump but still pocketable - while the 8010 is a trim 98 x 64 x 24 mm and tips the scale at just 245 grams. That’s a significant ergonomic difference - roughly one-third thinner for the rugged model, sculpted for discreet urban stalking and easy pocket carry.

The SH-2’s heft and bulk come from its monster 24x optical zoom lens, demanding a bigger body for that hardware. The Tough 8010, purpose-built for adventures, flaunts a confidently durable shell with official waterproofing, shockproofing, and freezeproofing. It’s the kind of camera you toss in a backpack without a second thought - even if you get caught in a rainstorm or accidentally drop it.

On controls: The SH-2 offers touchscreen input and a decent button spread, while the 8010 sticks to a more minimalist traditional button layout, lacking touch. This reflects the 8010’s older design vintage, emphasizing rugged simplicity over versatility.

A good control layout can make or break any shoot, and the SH-2 definitely learned from predecessors here.

The SH-2’s tactile dials and buttons feel snug under my fingers - there’s real intention behind the layout, putting exposure compensation, manual modes, and quick-function buttons within easy reach. The Tough 8010’s controls suit simple point-and-shoot use but lack manual exposure options, suggesting it aims more at casual shooters or outdoor enthusiasts wanting durable snapshots.

For anyone who cherishes manual control, the SH-2 clearly wins here. It is a small luxury that encourages creativity, even if you’re shooting fully automatic 95% of the time.

Inside the Box: Sensor & Imaging Engine Face-Off

When it comes down to pixel-peeping and image quality, sensor tech and image processing engines usually tell the most objective story. Olympus packed their 2015 SH-2 with a 1/2.3” type BSI-CMOS sensor delivering 16 megapixels and paired it with the advanced TruePic VII image processor. The typical crop-sensor magicwand for small compacts.

The Tough 8010, on the other hand, leans on an older 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring roughly the same physical size but offering only 13 megapixels, plus the dated TruePic III processor. It’s a generation gap that’s palpable in everything from noise control to dynamic range.

Testing both cameras side-by-side on a sunny day and again in tricky low light revealed what you’d expect: The SH-2’s BSI-CMOS sensor excels at higher ISOs, preserving detail with less noise and a broader dynamic range. The Tough 8010’s CCD sensor delivers respectable daylight shots but struggles once ISO climbs past 400 - grain becomes readily apparent, and shadows lose nuance.

Interestingly, although both sensors share the classic 1/2.3" designation, subtle design improvements on the SH-2’s sensor (back-illuminated architecture) turbocharge light gathering - an advantage you’ll appreciate in dim environments or indoor shooting.

So if your photography ventures into moody interiors, dusk street scenes, or any low-light realm, the SH-2 is my pick for sustained quality.

Zoom Range and Lens Performance: Versatility vs. Simplicity

The literal lens through which each camera views the world speaks volumes about intended users and shooting styles.

The SH-2 boasts a formidable 25-600mm equivalent zoom (24x optical zoom!), enabling telephoto reach that’d make many mirrorless cameras blush. The max aperture varies from an acceptable f/3.0 at wide angle down to a narrower f/6.9 at full telephoto, a common tradeoff at such extreme focal lengths.

The Tough 8010 offers a modest 28-140mm (5x optical zoom), with apertures ranging from f/3.9 to f/5.9 - more pedestrian but still versatile for general snapshots and medium-zoom perspectives.

For those who crave telephoto power to capture distant wildlife, tight portraits, or event details, the SH-2’s zoom range is a major standout. Of course, that comes with caveats - such as potential image quality drop-off at the long end and slower aperture limiting low-light tele shooting.

By contrast, the Tough 8010’s zoom is compact and effortless, ideal for casual shooting or travel where durability outweighs zoom clout.

In macro, the SH-2’s 3 cm minimum focus distance feels decent, but the 8010’s 1 cm macro focus range excels for close-up exploration of flowers, textures, and curiosities. The ability to literally get your subject’s face fills the frame is a useful bonus on a rugged camera meant for outdoor adventures.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Practical Use

Autofocus can make or break shot success, especially outside static studio setups. The SH-2 features Olympus’s contrast-detection autofocus with face detection and touch AF, plus continuous AF and tracking modes. It happily focuses in a range of lighting conditions, though at full telephoto it can slow slightly - par for the course with long zooms on compacts.

The Tough 8010 uses contrast detection AF only, without face detection or touch AF. It offers single AF with tracking, but no continuous AF or advanced focus area selection. This translates to slower, less precise focus acquisition, particularly in low contrast or challenging light.

Continuous shooting rates further underscore their divergent strengths: The SH-2 fires bursts at a brisk 11.5 fps - remarkably high for a compact - making it suitable for casual sports or action snapshots. The 8010 caps out at 5 fps, adequate for leisurely shooting but not fast action.

So if autofocus speed and tracking are key - whether sports, wildlife, or street - SH-2 again pulls ahead.

Screen, Viewfinder, and Interface: How You See Your Shots

Nothing beats a bright, clear screen when composing or reviewing shots, and here the SH-2 offers a 3-inch, 460k-dot LCD touchscreen. It’s easy to navigate menus and quickly adjust settings on the fly. Though not the highest resolution by today’s standards, it feels modern and responsive.

The Tough 8010’s 2.7-inch LCD has just 230k dots and no touchscreen input, a visible relic of its earlier 2010 vintage.

Neither camera sports an electronic viewfinder, which is a bit of a bummer for bright outdoor shooting. You’ll want to get comfortable using the rear LCD and shading it with your hands when the sun is overhead.

Personal takeaway: While the SH-2’s screen isn’t a game-changer by modern standards, it’s a refreshing leap ahead compared with the 8010’s duller display, improving composition and usability in day-to-day shooting.

Real-World Image Quality: Hands-On Testing

Of course, specs only tell part of the story. I put both cameras through a series of real-world photo tests, shooting a mix of portraits, landscapes, street snaps, macro shots, and even a few nighttime frames - yes, with a lot of patience and a tripod.

Olympus SH 2 front Olympus SH 2 screen back Olympus 8010 front Olympus 8010 screen back

Portraits: The SH-2’s higher resolution sensor rendered skin tones more smoothly, with better gradation and less noise. Its face detection autofocus was reliable and quick, even indoors. The limited aperture range (f/3.0 wide angle) yields modest background separation but respectable bokeh for a compact. The 8010’s portraits feel softer, with less refined color and more noise creeping into shadows.

Landscapes: The SH-2 impresses with slightly richer detail and dynamic range in the shadows and highlights. This translates to punchier skies and finely rendered textures in foliage. The 8010 produced decent landscapes but lacked the tonal nuance, particularly under challenging lighting.

Wildlife and Sports: The SH-2’s extensive zoom and rapid continuous shooting shine here, capturing fleeting moments with reasonable sharpness and tracking. The 8010 struggles to lock focus quickly enough for moving subjects and is hampered by a shorter zoom.

Street Photography: The 8010’s compactness and rugged build encourage a more discreet shooting style. The SH-2’s weight and size, combined with its more “camera-like” silhouette, make it marginally less street-friendly. In low light, the SH-2 has a clear edge thanks to better sensor performance.

Macro: The 8010 allows true close-up shots down to 1 cm, giving it an edge for detail lovers. SH-2 macro is competent but less intimate.

Night and Astro: Neither camera is stellar for astrophotography given sensor size and max ISO caps. The SH-2’s ISO 6400 ceiling and better noise control offer some advantage under moonlit conditions or indoors, but long exposures remain a challenge.

Video Capabilities: Moving Pictures Quality

The SH-2 records Full HD 1080p video at 60 frames per second, with H.264 compression. These specs suggest relatively smooth motion and decent sharpness for casual videographers. There’s no microphone port or 4K, of course, but the image stabilization helps reduce shake - a real plus for run-and-gun shooting.

The Tough 8010 tops out at 720p HD (1280 x 720) at 30 fps, more dated and less flexible for modern video needs. It too uses H.264 but lacks stabilization advantage during video.

Neither camera offers professional video features like log profiles or external mic support, so if video quality and control are important, both are limited, but SH-2 wins hands-down for overall usability and output.

Durability and Weather Resistance: Built for Life’s Rough-and-Tumble?

Durability is the Tough 8010’s raison d’être. Its waterproof (up to approximately 10m depth), shockproof (2.1m drops), and freezeproof (-10°C) ratings make it the choice for adventurers, beachgoers, or clumsy backpackers prone to accidental drops and bad weather.

The SH-2, while solid, isn’t weather sealed or shockproof in any way. You have to treat it like a delicate lab rat.

This distinction is huge for users with active outdoor lifestyles or those needing a worry-free rugged companion.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity: Practical Matters

Battery life is solidish for the SH-2 - rated for about 380 shots per charge, powered by the Olympus LI-92B rechargeable battery. The 8010’s battery specifics are less clearly documented, but using the Li-50B, expect roughly under 300 shots per charge - the tradeoff for waterproof sealing and a compact body.

Both cameras use SD/SDHC/SDXC card media and include a single card slot with minimal workflow complexity.

Connectivity leans heavily toward the SH-2’s favor. It boasts built-in wireless (Wi-Fi) connectivity, allowing quick file transfers to smart devices - a real boon in the smartphone era. The 8010 has no wireless features.

USB 2.0 and HDMI ports exist on both models, but the SH-2’s modernized USB standard supports faster data speeds.

Price-to-Performance Ratio: What Does Your Investment Buy?

Prices at launch tell a lot. The SH-2 debuted at roughly $399, while the Tough 8010 commanded around $599 - its rugged sealing understandably hiking the premium.

Today, both are available mainly on used markets or clearance, but the relative pricing guide helps place their value.

For $400, the SH-2 offers exceptional zoom range, better sensor tech, manual control, and wireless features. The tradeoff is a larger size and delicate build.

At roughly $600, the 8010 demands your premium for durability and simplicity, excellent for its waterproof niche but with aging image quality and limited features.

!

!

Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Choose the Olympus Stylus SH-2 if:

• You want a versatile superzoom that covers everything from landscapes to portraits, telephoto wildlife to street photography.
• Manual controls and touchscreen interface appeal to you.
• You prioritize image quality and responsiveness over ruggedness.
• Video quality with stabilization and Wi-Fi connectivity matters.
• Low-light performance is important.
• You don’t mind carrying a slightly larger camera.

Choose the Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 if:

• You need a tough camera that can survive drops, water immersion, and freezing temperatures.
• You prioritize portability, durability, and simplicity over extended zoom and advanced features.
• Your photography is focused on travel adventures, beach days, or extreme outdoor conditions.
• You’re okay with lower resolution images and moderate zoom range.
• Wireless connectivity and cinematic video are not priorities.

Final Thoughts: Two Cameras, Different Missions

Comparing the Olympus SH-2 and Tough 8010 is ultimately a tale of two compact camera philosophies. The SH-2 arrives as a confident muscle-zoom performer packed with marginally more modern tech - offering versatility, image quality, and creative options at a reasonable price.

The Tough 8010, meanwhile, sticks steadfastly to its hardy, no-nonsense niche, addressing a narrower but important user need: photographic survivability under harsh, unpredictable conditions where ruggedness trumps megapixels and zoom length.

For many photography enthusiasts looking for an all-rounder compact with some creative control, the SH-2 delivers solid bang for the buck. For outdoor enthusiasts, swimmers, and adventure seekers nevertheless, the 8010 still holds appeal despite its softer imaging skills.

If you had to own one, ask yourself: are you chasing artistic expression and long-reach images, or reliable grit that won't quit in a torrential downpour?

In the end, both are charmingly distinct cameras that each serve their loyal audiences well. That’s photography gear for you - an ongoing exploration of trade-offs, habits, and personalities, made richer by the variety of tools at our disposal.

Happy shooting!

For a side-by-side recap of specifications and detailed performance scores, scroll up to the embedded images - all tested and evaluated first-hand in my hands-on reviews over many shoots.