Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SH-2 was brought out 2 years after the TG-1 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SH-2 grades against the TG-1 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
SH-2 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2015 | ![]() | May 2012 | More modern by 35 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus SH-2
TG-1 iHS | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
SH-2 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-2 provides outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has proportions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the SH-2 and the TG-1 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cdfa/6cdfa8ea546e16bb5a09f0909246f95c5980ff5d" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-2 and TG-1 iHS is 88 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7366/c7366ae163ea2ccd5de8046b38c675854b8d716e" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-2 and TG-1 iHS.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus SH-2 to provide more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent SH-2 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7302d/7302d600a7027b73d7763324c699b3679c899d9b" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de848/de8480e187d4dd2c17a6b964b1a367465ad18aa2" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2015-03-11 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | 350 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $399 | $399 |