Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Replaced the Olympus SH-1
- New Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the SH-2 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SH-2 was manufactured 5 years later than the FS42 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the SH-2 matches up versus the FS42 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Panasonic FS42
SH-2 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2015 | ![]() | April 2009 | More recent by 72 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus SH-2
FS42 | SH-2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic FS42
SH-2 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-2 provides outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-2 against the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8fb1/c8fb164a9372dd4d48f97980f0400e3289b12cd7" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and FS42 is 88 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddb47/ddb473185ccd1a0b995239e847c5eec0627399d5" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-2 and FS42.
Clearly, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SH-2 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus SH-2 will offer greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent SH-2 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0586a/0586a1d9223085b26da8ffac8999ae33f45c6fe0" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de9c5/de9c51f81babf013538692a3a7b9931e42aa079f" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2015-03-11 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 132g (0.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $399 | $580 |