Clicky

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45
Olympus Stylus SH-2 front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Released March 2015
  • Previous Model is Olympus SH-1
  • Successor is Olympus SH-3
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Launched September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus SH-2 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The SH-2 was manufactured 6 months after the WG-M1 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SH-2 matches up against the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 SH-2 WG-M1 
Screen size3"1.5"Bigger screen (+1.5")
Screen resolution460k115kSharper screen (+345k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SH-2

 WG-M1 SH-2 

Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Ricoh WG-M1

 SH-2 WG-M1 
LaunchedMarch 2015September 2014Same generation
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-2 comes with outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus SH-2 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the SH-2 vs the WG-M1.

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and WG-M1 is 88 and 91 respectively.

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The pic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-2 and WG-M1.

As you have seen, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus SH-2 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SH-2 Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography details
44
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW files
manual focus not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
30
MP count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus SH-2 Street photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography details
70
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
provides touch to focus
lighter than average in class (271 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
53
environment proof
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
low max ISO (800)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus SH-2 Sports photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography details
51
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
good battery life (380 CIPA)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
38
MP count good (14MP)
environment proof
better than average battery power (350 per charge)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus SH-2 Travel photography information
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography information
74
good battery life (380 shots)
lighter than average in class (271g)
provides touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
64
better than average battery power (350 per charge)
environment proof
MP count good (14 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SH-2 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography factors
55
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (380 CIPA)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
35
MP count good (14MP)
environment proof
better than average battery power (350 per charge)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (1.5 inches)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low max ISO (800)
has no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SH-2 Vlogging info
Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging info
35
really wide (25mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (271g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external mic socket
26
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
doesn't have microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SH-2 and Ricoh WG-M1
 Olympus Stylus SH-2Ricoh WG-M1
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus SH-2 Ricoh WG-M1
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Released 2015-03-11 2014-09-12
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 6400 800
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-600mm (24.0x) (1×)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 1.5 inch
Display resolution 460k dot 115k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 11.5fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 271 grams (0.60 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 shots 350 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-92B DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory microSD/microSDHC, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $399 $2,000