Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FH22
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FH22, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is fairly close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-3 was manufactured 6 years after the FH22 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SH-3 scores versus the FH22 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FH22
| SH-3 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 75 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus SH-3
| FH22 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FH22
| SH-3 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 has got external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic FH22 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FH22 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the SH-3 against the FH22.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and FH22 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The picture underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and FH22.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus SH-3 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern SH-3 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2016-02-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 170 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $579 | $200 |