Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX850
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
90 Imaging
54 Features
70 Overall
60
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX850 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Announced January 2017
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9
Photography Glossary Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX850: A Hands-on Comparison from an Experienced Camera Reviewer
Whether you’re stepping into photography for the first time or seeking a solid backup to your pro rig, the right camera can make all the difference. Today, I’m diving deep into two very different yet intriguing models: the rugged Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and the versatile Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850. Each caters to distinct needs, but both deserve your attention if you want practical advice rooted in years of serious testing.
Having personally put thousands of cameras through their paces - under studio lights, in stormy landscapes, wildlife hideouts, and bustling streets - I’ll help you navigate their strengths, weaknesses, and real-world usability. Buckle up for a comprehensive, 2500-word journey through everything from sensor tech and autofocus to ergonomics, image quality, and genre suitability.
At First Glance: Compact Durability Meets Entry-Level Mirrorless Sophistication
Right away, these cameras tell very different stories about their intended users. The Olympus Tough-3000, announced back in 2010, is a compact adventure partner designed for durability. It’s waterproof, shockproof, and freezeproof - perfect for rugged outdoor use. Meanwhile, the Panasonic GX850, from 2017, is an entry-level mirrorless with a Micro Four Thirds sensor, tilting touchscreen, and a design aimed at travel, vlogging, and creative shooting flexibility.
Let’s start by comparing their physical size and ergonomics - fundamentals that affect your shooting ease day-to-day.

As you see, Olympus packs its Tough-3000 into a lean, weather-sealed body measuring just 96x65x23mm and weighing a featherweight 159 grams. It fits snugly in your palm, making it an ideal companion where bulk equals inconvenience - think snorkeling or snowy hikes. The downside: compactness often means cramped controls, small buttons, and little room for customization.
The Panasonic GX850 is larger (107x65x33mm) and heavier (269 grams) but still pocketable compared to DSLR rigs. Its rangefinder-style body is designed for comfortable one-handed use, with well-spaced buttons and a robust grip area. The tilting touchscreen enhances navigation and selfie framing, something the Olympus lacks.
Sensor and Image Quality: CCD vs CMOS, Size Matters
Sensor specs often define how a camera performs across genres - from landscapes to portraits. Here, the gulf widens considerably.

- Olympus Tough-3000: 1/2.3" CCD sensor (6.08x4.56mm) with 12 megapixels, 1600 max ISO
- Panasonic GX850: 17.3x13mm Micro Four Thirds CMOS sensor with 16 megapixels, ISO up to 25600 native
Fundamentally, the GX850’s sensor is nearly eight times larger in area, allowing significantly better dynamic range, color depth, and low-light performance. The CCD sensor in the Tough-3000 - common in early rugged compacts - has limited ability to capture fine detail or handle high ISO cleanly. It’s fine for casual snapshots under daylight but quickly runs out of steam as conditions get demanding.
I spent multiple sessions comparing RAW and JPEG output in identical scenes. The GX850’s images exhibit richer colors, finer detail rendering, and notably less noise at ISO 1600 compared to the Olympus’s soft, grainy shots. This difference becomes starker in shadows and highlights due to superior dynamic range - the GX850 scored a solid 13.3 EV compared to the Tough-3000’s untested but predictably poor performance given its sensor class.
Design and Control Layout: Operational Comfort vs Simplistic Ruggedness
Handling is crucial, especially over long shoots or in challenging environments. Which camera feels better in the hand - and more importantly, is more intuitive?

The Tough-3000’s minimal physical controls reflect its rugged ethos: straightforward but limited. You get no manual modes, no exposure compensation, and no customizable buttons - everything operates mostly on auto. Controls are small and flat, with a fixed 2.7-inch low-res LCD. This simplicity suits adventurers less interested in tweaking settings and more focused on shooting swiftly in unpredictable situations.
In contrast, the GX850 boasts a modern layout with a dedicated mode dial offering aperture priority, shutter priority, and manual exposure modes - critical for creative photographers. The 3-inch tilting touchscreen, boasting 1040k dots, significantly improves shot composition and menu navigation. Touch AF and intuitive settings access speed up workflow, a decisive edge for travel and daily shooting.
LCD and Interface: Fixed vs. Tilt & Touch
For live framing and playback, the screens markedly differ in quality and versatility.

The Tough-3000’s fixed 2.7" LCD is serviceable but low resolution (230k dots), making it harder to judge focus and image details accurately. It doesn’t support touch, and brightness controls are basic. This limitation hurts shooting in bright outdoor conditions - ironic given its outdoor-adventure focus.
The GX850’s 3" fully articulating touchscreen makes compositions (including selfies) much easier and the 1040k-dot resolution reveals fine detail at review time. The touchscreen interface also allows touch-to-focus and menu control, speeding up adjustments during active shooting or video recording.
Autofocus Capabilities: Contrast-Detection vs Advanced Multi-Point Systems
Accurate and speedy autofocus is a linchpin for wildlife, sports, and street photographers. Here the Panasonic GX850 shines dramatically.
- Olympus Tough-3000: Basic contrast-detection AF with fixed AF points, single AF mode only, no face detection
- Panasonic GX850: 49 contrast-detection AF points, face detection, continuous AF, AF tracking, touch-AF
In hands-on testing, the Tough-3000 faltered with moving subjects and struggled in low light, with slow and sometimes “hunting” autofocus behavior. Portraits required patience, as eye detection and selective AF are missing.
The GX850 proved reliable and quick, locking on faces and subjects with minimal lag. Continuous AF enabled confident tracking of moving targets, making it usable for casual wildlife and street photography where you need to capture moments swiftly.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility: Fixed Zoom vs Micro Four Thirds Mount
The Tough-3000 comes with a built-in fixed zoom lens offering 28-102mm equivalent at f/3.5-5.1. Its sensor’s 5.9x crop factor and limited aperture mean it’s no powerhouse for bokeh or low-light photography. The macro mode down to 2cm is a nice touch but optical quality is average.
The GX850 embraces the Micro Four Thirds mount, unlocking over 100 lenses ranging from ultrawide to telephoto primes, zooms, and specialty glass.
This vast selection provides unmatched creative freedom. I tested the GX850 with lenses spanning:
- Panasonic 15mm f/1.7 for portraits and street
- Lumix 42.5mm f/1.7 for sharp, creamy bokeh portraits
- Olympus 60mm f/2.8 macro for close-ups
This adaptability also means you can tailor your setup for landscapes, sports, macro, or video work much more easily.
Continuous Shooting and Video: From Snapshot to 4K Capture
Burst rate and video capability can make or break uses like sports or vlogging.
- Olympus Tough-3000: Single shot at 1 fps, 720p HD video at 30fps, no advanced video features
- Panasonic GX850: 10 fps burst, 4K video at 30fps and 24fps, 1080p at 60fps, 4K photo mode
The Olympus’s single-frame shooting and limited HD video make it a snapshot camera - moments are precious, but motion capture is basic. The GX850’s 4K recording and burst frame rates position it well for action and high-res video creators.
Note: Neither camera includes headphone or external mic inputs, which constrains audio control for serious filmmakers.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Rugged Adventure vs Standard Consumer
One of the Tough-3000’s defining features is its outright durability:
- Waterproof to ~10m
- Shockproof from 2m drops
- Freezeproof down to -10°C
- Dustproof absent - worth noting for sandy environments
The GX850, being an entry-level mirrorless, lacks weather sealing or rugged protections. Its magnesium alloy body is solid but remains vulnerable to moisture and rough handling.
If your work regularly exposes you to wet or hostile conditions, Olympus’s ruggedness could be the deciding factor.
Battery Life and Storage: Endurance in the Field
Battery life and storage options influence how long you can keep shooting without interruption.
- Olympus Tough-3000: Battery life unspecified (likely modest), uses standard SD/SDHC cards
- Panasonic GX850: Rated at ~210 shots on a single charge, uses microSD / SDHC / SDXC cards
In my experience, the GX850’s battery life is average for a mirrorless camera but requires carrying spares for extended trips. Olympus, having a simpler sensor and fewer moving parts, likely stretches battery life longer, but lack of official data is a drawback.
Wireless Features and Connectivity: Modern Convenience vs Basic
Connectivity impacts post-shoot workflows and sharing.
- Tough-3000: No wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth), USB 2.0, HDMI out
- GX850: Built-in Wi-Fi, USB 2.0, HDMI out, no Bluetooth or NFC
The GX850’s Wi-Fi allows remote control and easy file transfer using Panasonic’s app - a big boost for travel and social media photography. Lack of Bluetooth is unfortunate but not deal-breaking.
Image Samples: Real-World Output Comparison
After hours of shooting landscapes, portraits, macro, and low-light scenarios, I’m sharing sample crops to highlight colour fidelity, sharpness, and noise performance.
You’ll notice the GX850 delivers crisper, colorful images with better detail retention, especially in shadow areas. The Olympus results are softer, with more noise creeping in above ISO 400.
Genre-Specific Performance Assessment: Where Each Camera Shines
Let’s look at individual photography disciplines informed by my controlled testing and fieldwork:
| Discipline | Olympus Tough-3000 | Panasonic GX850 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Limited by fixed lens, poor bokeh, no face detection | Strong AF, better bokeh, skin tone rendition |
| Landscape | Adequate dynamic range under daylight, rugged use tough | Superior resolution and dynamic range, no weather seal |
| Wildlife | Slow AF, single fps, limited telezoom | Fast continuous AF and burst; lens options excel |
| Sports | Poor tracking, slow response | Reliable tracking, fast burst |
| Street | Compact and durable but less discrete due to design | Compact rangefinder style, easy to carry and shoot discreetly |
| Macro | Close focusing but average resolution | Excellent with dedicated macro lenses and focus stacking |
| Night/Astro | Limited ISO and dynamic range | High ISO and 4K offer creative exposure options |
| Video | Basic 720p only | 4K UHD with advanced settings |
| Travel | Small, waterproof, simple | Versatile, Wi-Fi, customizable |
| Professional Work | Very limited by lack of RAW, controls | RAW support, manual controls, versatile |
Overall Performance Ratings: A Side-by-Side Scorecard
Putting everything together - based on image quality, handling, features, and versatility - here’s how I’d rank them:
| Feature | Olympus Tough-3000 | Panasonic GX850 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 4/10 | 8/10 |
| Ergonomics | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Autofocus | 3/10 | 8/10 |
| Build Quality | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Video | 3/10 | 8/10 |
| Battery Life | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Connectivity | 1/10 | 7/10 |
| Lens Ecosystem | Fixed lens | Extensive |
| Price-to-Performance | High (low-cost) | Moderate |
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose the Olympus Tough-3000 if:
- You absolutely need a tough, waterproof, shockproof camera for extreme adventure sports or underwater use.
- You value simplicity over image quality - snapshots without fuss.
- You want something ultra-lightweight to toss in a backpack for rough handling.
It is not a good companion for serious photographers wanting creative control or high-quality imagery.
Choose the Panasonic GX850 if:
- You want a flexible entry-level mirrorless system with excellent image quality.
- You value manual exposure controls, RAW shooting, and fast AF.
- You’re interested in 4K video and advanced photographic techniques like focus stacking.
- You want access to a wide array of lenses for every genre.
- You shoot portraits, street, travel, and macro often and want great image fidelity.
Final Thoughts: Context is King in Camera Choice
This comparison reinforces that cameras serve distinct purposes shaped by the user’s environment, proficiency, and creative goals. The Olympus Tough-3000 is a niche tool - a specialized rugged compact for adventurers who prioritize survive-and-shoot reliability over image excellence.
Conversely, the Panasonic GX850 embodies what I often call the "all-rounder for enthusiasts" - marrying user-friendly interface, modern sensor technology, and lens versatility at a reasonable entry-level price. It’s a camera I’ve enjoyed shooting in cities, portrait sessions, and landscapes alike, and I trust it in many professional workflows.
Your choice boils down to priorities:
- Rugged simplicity and water resistance? Olympus Tough-3000.
- Creative flexibility and image quality? Panasonic GX850.
With this knowledge, you can confidently steer your purchase to what truly fits your visual storytelling. If you want to dive deeper or have questions about specific shooting scenarios, I’m happy to share more of my hands-on findings.
Happy shooting!
All image credits: CameraReview Labs
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX850 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2017-01-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3448 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 20 Mbps, MP4, H.264 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lb) | 269g (0.59 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 586 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 sec, 3 images/10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $548 |