Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88116/88116e64f46e39b4199ab42d569c8a4fa375dbc2" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front"
69 Imaging
50 Features
40 Overall
46
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony A230, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the A230 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and A230 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was introduced 8 months later than the A230 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Tough-3000 matches up vs the A230 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A230. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Sony A230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony A230
Tough-3000 | A230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus Tough-3000
A230 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony A230
Tough-3000 | A230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony A230 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") and a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).
See the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony A230 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the A230.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31ef3/31ef3a074828557ee4ecf48c94f2069883cd299f" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and A230 is 94 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c3af/8c3afe850b2d0d5f7713acf16e3c334056712a54" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and A230.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus Tough-3000 will resolve extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher Tough-3000 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a00da/a00dacf2a93a8d844c3d08dfe5ee4cac4a1ad3a3" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69d44/69d44c3cca759a5c941ae33a570a7bea38ed2162" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A230 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 |
Alternative name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2009-05-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 490 grams (1.08 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $569 |