Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released June 2013
- New Model is Sony RX1R II
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and RX1R (Full frame) use different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Tough-3000 was brought out 4 years earlier than the RX1R and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the RX1R in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony RX1R
Tough-3000 | RX1R |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Olympus Tough-3000
RX1R | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2013 | January 2010 | More recent by 42 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper display (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX1R
Tough-3000 | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 offers exterior measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
See the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the RX1R.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and RX1R is 94 and 79 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and RX1R.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Tough-3000 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony RX1R will show greater detail having its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Other name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2013-06-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 482 grams (1.06 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 91 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $2,798 |