Olympus 6000 vs Olympus 6010

Here is a complete overview of the Olympus 6000 and Olympus 6010, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the 6000 (10MP) and the 6010 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The 6000 was manufactured within a month of the 6010 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the 6000 scores versus the 6010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6010. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Olympus 6010 Gallery.

If you're intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 6000 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus 6010 has sizing of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).

See the Olympus 6000 and Olympus 6010 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the 6000 compared to the 6010.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6000 and 6010 is 94 and 94 respectively.

Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 6000 and 6010.

As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus 6010 to deliver extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively.