Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K200D
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
61 Imaging
50 Features
41 Overall
46
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Announced September 2008
- Earlier Model is Pentax K100D S
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Olympus 6000 and Pentax K200D, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the 6000 (10MP) and the K200D (10MP) is pretty comparable but the 6000 (1/2.3") and K200D (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 6000 was revealed 11 months later than the K200D so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the 6000 scores versus the K200D when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Pentax K200D. The full galleries are available at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Pentax K200D
| 6000 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 |  | September 2008 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus 6000
| K200D | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Pentax K200D
| 6000 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 6000 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Pentax K200D has sizing of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") and a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6000 and Pentax K200D in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the 6000 versus the K200D.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6000 and K200D is 94 and 61 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The visual below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 6000 and K200D.
As you can tell, both cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The 6000 has got the smaller sensor which will make achieving bokeh harder. The fresher 6000 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Pentax K200D |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2008-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 179 gr (0.39 pounds) | 690 gr (1.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $259 | $600 |