Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
![Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000/Olympus-6000-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX200V/Sony-TX200V-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus 6000 and Sony TX200V, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The 6000 was announced 3 years prior to the TX200V and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the 6000 scores versus the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 6000 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Sony TX200V
6000 | TX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus 6000
TX200V | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
Display dimension | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Sony TX200V
6000 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6000 comes with outer measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6000 and Sony TX200V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the 6000 against the TX200V.
![Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V size comparison Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX200V-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6000 and TX200V is 94 and 96 respectively.
![Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX200V-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 6000 and TX200V.
Clearly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Sony TX200V to produce greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older 6000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
![Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX200V-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX200V-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Also called as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 179 gr (0.39 lb) | 129 gr (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $259 | $500 |