Olympus 6010 vs Sony RX10 IV
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Olympus 6010 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched September 2017
- Old Model is Sony RX10 III

Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV: A Hands-On Comparative Review for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing a camera in today’s saturated market means balancing your photographic needs against feature sets that sometimes couldn’t be more different. The Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV epitomize this contrast. On paper, they might seem like they’re worlds apart - and indeed, they are. But each commands its own niche with unique capabilities and purposeful engineering. Having spent extensive time with both, putting them through rigorous workflows and real-world scenarios, I’m ready to unpack how these two cameras stack up across your photographic disciplines - and whether your next camera should be an Olympus weather-sealed compact or a mammoth Sony super-zoom bridge.
Let’s dive deeply, dissecting everything from sensor prowess through autofocus finesse, build quality, and final image nuances, all framed around practical photographic use cases.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Build Strength
At first glance, size matters. The Olympus 6010 is compact and rugged - a go-anywhere waterproof companion. Weighing a mere 179 grams and measuring roughly 95 x 63 x 22mm, it slots effortlessly into jackets or pockets. Put it side-by-side with the Sony RX10 IV - a strikingly large and hefty camera at 1,095 grams and dimensions of approximately 133 x 94 x 145 mm - and you immediately sense different ambitions. The RX10 IV is designed for an immersive photographic experience, almost like a DSLR in feel, with grip, balance, and control slapped on generously.
The Olympus’s tough build serves a specific user profile: adventurers, divers, and hikers who want durable waterproofing, freezeproofing, and shock resistance for unpredictable environments. It can literally survive a drop or two, making it a pure tool for rugged action.
Sony’s RX10 IV, although not sealed for water or dust resistance, offers professional-level construction with weather sealing. The added heft translates into stable handling especially when mounted with its substantial 24-600mm equivalent zoom lens.
Top Controls and Usability in the Field
The Olympus 6010 opts for simplicity: a handful of buttons and a mode dial that keep things straightforward. No physical focus ring or manual exposure options here - this points squarely to point-and-shoot ease rather than manual intervention. For casual shooters or those prioritizing durability and straightforward operation, it’s an intuitive workflow, albeit limited.
In contrast, the Sony RX10 IV commands a rich control layout: dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, ISO, and an exposure compensation dial ensure that manual shooters can fine-tune exposure on the fly. Two custom buttons, a broad mode selection, a tilting touchscreen, and an eye-level electronic viewfinder - these features cater profoundly to professionals and enthusiasts who demand precision and quick access to settings without fumbling through menus. Indeed, the illuminated buttons are absent, but the overall ergonomics mitigate any navigational issues. In fast-paced environments such as sports, this control scheme feels indispensable.
Display and Viewfinder Capabilities: Clarity Meets Function
The Olympus features a modest 2.7-inch fixed LCD with low resolution (230k dots). It’s usable for framing and quick review but struggles in bright sunlight and lacks touch or tilt functions. Live view is offered but no touch autofocus or selfie-friendly orientation exists. This small screen is a functional compromise matching the camera's rugged compactness.
Sony, on the other hand, gives you a 3-inch, 1.44 million dot articulated touchscreen. The ability to tilt comes in handy for low or high angle shooting, and the touch interface streamlines AF point selection and menu navigation. Complementing this is a bright electronic viewfinder offering 2.36 million dots with 100% coverage and 0.7x magnification. Having tested this viewfinder extensively, I appreciate its natural colors and minimal lag - capable of use even under glaring daylight. This hybrid optical-like experience greatly improves composition accuracy and frame stability in dynamic shooting conditions.
Sensor Architecture and Image Quality Fundamentals
Here, the difference is seismic. The Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 sports a modest 1/2.3" CCD sensor measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm, with 12 megapixels output. Conventional compact camera stuff - adequate for casual snaps, but it inevitably limits dynamic range, low-light performance, and noise handling. Its maximum native ISO tops at 1600, which I found usable only in well-lit scenarios. Image resolution maxes at 3968 x 2976 pixels, fitting for prints under A4 but not beyond.
Sony's RX10 IV boasts a substantially larger 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor at 13.2 x 8.8 mm, nearly 4x the surface area of the Olympus sensor. It delivers 20 megapixels, outputting detailed 5472 x 3648 images. This sensor’s backside illumination and newer architecture yield considerable low-noise, wide dynamic range, and better highlight roll-off. Native ISO ranges from 125 to 12,800 with boost modes up to 25,600. I found the RX10 IV shines in challenging lighting, enabling usable images deep into the shadows while preserving color fidelity.
Between these two, detail retrieval, color depth, and tonal gradation clearly favor the Sony.
Autofocus Systems and Burst Shooting: Speed and Accuracy in Action
Autofocus (AF) quality often defines how successfully you capture fast-moving subjects. The Olympus 6010, with its contrast-detection-only AF system and no face or eye detection, is inherently slower and less precise. It offers single autofocus but no continuous AF tracking, making it unsuitable for capturing fast action or wildlife. With no selectable AF points, it centers its AF to the middle or relies on multisegment metering, which often leads to missed focus or hunting in low light.
The Sony RX10 IV incorporates a hybrid autofocus system with 315 phase-detection points spread across nearly 65% of the frame combined with contrast detection. The eye and face detection algorithms extend to animal eye AF, a boon for wildlife and pet photographers. I put this system through intense burst tests at 24 fps with AF/AE tracking active - and it delivered reliable lock-on tracking with minimal frame loss, even on erratic subjects such as birds in flight and sports players. This autofocus sophistication makes the RX10 IV one of the fastest and most reliable bridge cameras available today.
Optics and Zoom Reach: Versatility vs. Simplicity
Lens wise, the Olympus 6010 sports a fixed zoom 28-102 mm equivalent (3.6x zoom), with an aperture range of f/3.5-5.1. This lens is valuable for travel or casual use, offering wide to moderate telephoto reach, but the relatively slow aperture and lack of optical zoom sophistication limits low-light reach and depth-of-field control. Minimal distortion and good edge sharpness partly compensate, but it cannot compete with larger or more complex optic designs.
Sony RX10 IV’s lens is a marquee feature: a 24-600 mm (25x) f/2.4-4.0 Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* lens. The exceptionally long zoom range covers everything from wide landscapes to distant wildlife without swapping lenses. Its comparatively bright aperture allows extensive background blur at short to medium focal lengths, and image stabilization minimizes shake significantly across zooms. The lens is impressively sharp corner-to-corner, and aberration control is excellent thanks to multiple aspherical and ED elements.
For macro aficionados, both offer close focusing: Olympus gets down to 2cm, Sony at 3cm. The 6010’s 2 cm macro range is noteworthy for a compact, but Sony’s larger sensor and superior optics deliver crisper macro detail and better bokeh separation.
Durability and Weather Resistance: Built for the Elements?
The Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 is built like a tank and explicitly intended for harsh conditions. It withstands full waterproofing up to 10 meters, shock resistance to 2 meters, freezeproof down to -10°C, and dust protection. This makes it an excellent choice for rough fieldwork, underwater photography, outdoor sports like kayaking, or even casual snapshots in adverse environments where you simply do not want to worry about water damage or impact.
Sony RX10 IV lacks explicit waterproof or freezeproof certifications. It does have some weather sealing - resisting light rain or dust - yet I would never recommend it for wet or very dusty environments without additional protection. Its bulk and sensitive electronics need careful handling outdoors. However, in controlled outdoor settings or studio environments, its solid body is reassuring.
Battery Life and Storage Solutions
Battery life is another clear contrast. The Olympus uses the LI-50C battery with comparatively modest performance since its focus is not high frame-rate bursts or long video shoots. Although exact shot counts aren’t specified, expect a conservative daily shoot time suitable for casual users.
The Sony RX10 IV deploys the NP-FW50 battery, rated approximately 400 shots per charge under CIPA standards. In my testing with mixed shooting including bursts and video capture, expect to refresh batteries or bring spares for full-day professional work, especially when the EVF is regularly engaged.
Storage options differ: Olympus accepts xD Picture Cards and microSD cards - formats becoming increasingly rare and limited in capacity and write speeds. Sony intelligently supports SD, SDHC, SDXC cards and Memory Stick Duo/Pro variants, supporting faster card speeds matching rapid JPEG and raw continuous shooting.
Video Capabilities: From Basic Clips to 4K Excellence
Olympus 6010’s video offerings are basic: MAX resolution is VGA (640 x 480) at 30 fps, saved in Motion JPEG. There is no 4K or Full HD recording, no microphone input, and no stabilization tailored specifically for video. This restricts the camera to very casual video use, mostly for fun snaps or documentation where quality is not critical.
The Sony RX10 IV shines here with 4K UHD video recording at 30p, 25p, or 24p using XAVC S codec. Full HD 1080p recording at up to 60p is also available with slow-motion options. Optical image stabilization paired with high frame rates makes handheld video significantly smoother. Pro features include microphone and headphone jacks for audio monitoring and control - essential for high-quality production. Although it doesn’t have the raw video output or 6K photo capabilities found on higher-end Sony models, the RX10 IV remains a versatile hybrid for filmmakers and photographers alike.
Addressing Key Photography Genres
To fully understand where each camera fits, let me walk you through their performance in major traditional and professional photography types, based on direct shooting experience.
Portrait Photography
Portraiture is about skin tone reproduction, precise eye detection, and controlled bokeh. The Olympus 6010’s innate limitations in sensor size and absence of face or eye AF mean portraits often lack subject isolation and softness in background rendering. Skin tones are passable but can edge toward flatness due to limited dynamic range. Depth of field control is constrained by small sensor physics - background and foreground tend to blend.
Sony’s RX10 IV excels with precise eye tracking autofocus - I consistently nailed sharp eyes even at 600mm focal length. The 1-inch sensor produces natural skin tones and pleasing gradients, thanks to superb image processing. Its fast aperture at f/2.4 (wide-angle) facilitates delicate background blur, enhancing subject separation beautifully. The articulating screen and EVF help with composition and retouch preview on the spot.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters prize resolution, dynamic range, and versatility. Olympus 6010’s lower resolution and limited sensor dynamic range impose difficulties capturing wide tonal range - like bright skies and shaded foregrounds - in a single shot. The waterproof/shockproof design might encourage use in rugged environments, but overall image quality here cannot compare to more advanced models.
Sony RX10 IV delivers a high-resolution sensor and wide-angle 24 mm equivalent lens, complete with excellent sharpness across the frame at f/8–f/11. I valued its ability to maintain highlight detail in bright conditions, thanks to expanded DR and processing. Its weather sealing, while not waterproof, withstood drizzle well during landscape hikes, and the long 600mm zoom lends unexpected versatility to access distant patterns (wildlife, fine architectural detail).
Wildlife and Sports Photography
The Olympus 6010 is not designed for fast or distant shooting - its slow AF and limited zoom (102mm equivalent) restrict wildlife or sports use severely. Furthermore, we lack burst shooting capabilities, making it a miss for action scenes.
The Sony RX10 IV dominates here. With a blazing 24 fps burst and sophisticated AF tracking that follows erratic motion, it’s a stellar tool for birds in flight, motorsports, or complex field environments. The telephoto zoom reaching 600mm combined with the rapid AF enables sharp, perfectly framed captures of fleeting moments at a distance. Additionally, silent shutter capability enhances stealth usage in wildlife photography.
Street Photography
Street photography typically demands portability, subtlety, and quick responsiveness. The Olympus 6010 scores on size and toughness - it slips into a jacket pocket and can endure sudden rain or dust - ideal for urban explorers or documentary photographers on the go without worrying about rough handling.
However, its slower AF and lack of manual controls may frustrate decisive moments calling for rapid focus shifts or exposure tweaks.
The Sony RX10 IV, though excellent in image quality and AF, is bulky and conspicuous - a detriment for candid street photography where discretion is key. While its fast AF helps capture spontaneous scenes, its weight and size make it less practical for daylong roaming.
Macro Photography
For close-up work, both cameras can focus tight: Olympus reaching 2 cm and Sony 3 cm. In practice, Olympus allows slightly closer framing, but the RX10 IV’s large sensor, superior optics, and image stabilization deliver sharper detail and creamy focus falloff. This benefit is noticeable when capturing insects or texture detail that demands pixel-level resolution.
Night and Astro Photography
Low-light and astro environments expose sensor and processing limitations deeply.
Olympus 6010 max ISO of 1600 and its older CCD sensor result in noisy shadows and limited dynamic range. Without manual exposure control and long shutter options (max 2 sec), it’s ill-equipped for star trails or nighttime landscapes.
Meanwhile, Sony RX10 IV boasts slow shutter speeds down to 30 seconds and ISO up to 12,800 native; noise handling is impressive for its category. The tilting screen facilitates composing during awkward night shoots, and long exposure noise reduction maintains clean files. In my astro sessions, its output was respectable, though not quite up to dedicated astrophotography rigs.
Video and Travel Photography
As noted, Olympus is basic for video, limiting its value for travel vloggers or multimedia professionals beyond casual clips.
Sony RX10 IV is a powerhouse video hybrid. Its 4K capability, microphone jacks, and comprehensive codec support make it a versatile travel camera covering stills and video comprehensively. Its extensive zoom enables capturing scenes from tight street markets to distant landscapes without lens swaps - a huge travel convenience.
Professional Use and Workflow Integration
Olympus 6010’s JPEG-only output and limited customization exclude it from professional workflows demanding raw flexibility and color-grading potential.
Sony RX10 IV supports raw files, offers dual card compatibility, and works seamlessly with industry software. Its exposure modes, AF sophistication, and custom buttons meet pros’ needs for reliability, speed, and workflow integration. Its USB 2.0 port ensures convenient tethering for studio work.
Comparative Scorecards and Summary Ratings
Our comprehensive testing pools scores from sensor performance, autofocus, image quality, video specs, and handling. Unsurprisingly, the Sony RX10 IV outpaces Olympus 6010 on nearly every front except rugged durability.
• Portraits: Sony RX10 IV leads with better skin tones, autofocus, and bokeh.
• Landscapes: Sony’s image quality, sensor size, and lens versatility trump Olympus’s durability risks.
• Wildlife / Sports: Sony’s 24fps and tracking AF unmatched vs Olympus’s slow response.
• Street: Olympus gains on portability but loses on responsiveness; Sony reverses these.
• Macro: Sony wins on sharpness; Olympus wins on minimum focusing distance.
• Night/Astro: Sony capable; Olympus severely limited.
• Video: Sony far superior.
• Travel: Depends on priorities; Olympus for rugged convenience, Sony for image/video quality.
• Professionals: Sony the clear choice.
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?
Both cameras embody distinct philosophies:
-
If you seek a compact, extremely rugged, waterproof companion camera for casual, outdoor, and adventure use - where ease, durability, and simplicity are paramount - the Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 delivers well. It’s a no-frills shooter built to survive.
-
If you are a serious enthusiast, hybrid shooter, or professional wanting exceptional image quality, versatile zoom reach, sophisticated autofocus, rich video features, and manual controls suitable for multiple genres, the Sony RX10 IV is outstanding, albeit trading size and pocketability for performance.
I often ask myself: Would I take the Olympus 6010 on a climbing expedition where risking my camera is high? Absolutely. Would I carry the RX10 IV everyday for landscape or wildlife? Without hesitation, yes - provided I want professional-level results and am comfortable managing the extra bulk.
Choosing between them depends fundamentally on your photographic priorities and shooting style. The Olympus 6010 embraces durability over versatility, familiar simplicity over cutting-edge tech. The Sony RX10 IV champions image and video excellence with a pro-centric feature set, dominating a broad range of photographic disciplines. Understanding these strengths and weaknesses, combined with your budget and needs, will lead to a highly satisfactory purchase.
Feel free to explore sample galleries from both cameras below to see results with your own eyes:
I hope this detailed hands-on evaluation empowers your decision-making, arming you with insights only gained from extensive laboratory and field testing. Should you need further clarifications regarding compatibility with specific lenses or integration into your workflow, don’t hesitate to ask - this comparison reflects the tip of the iceberg in our ongoing quest to make camera choices as straightforward and well-informed as possible. Happy shooting!
Olympus 6010 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Also called | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-17 | 2017-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 179 grams (0.39 pounds) | 1095 grams (2.41 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50C | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $1,698 |