Olympus 6020 vs Pentax Efina
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax Efina Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Introduced June 2013

Head-to-Head: Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 vs Pentax Efina – Which Compact Camera Fits Your Photography Journey?
If you’re exploring compact cameras that combine simplicity with some standout features, the Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and the Pentax Efina both present interesting options from their respective generations. While neither is a modern flagship, their design philosophies and specifications reveal different priorities, catering to distinct user needs.
In this thorough comparison, we’ll dissect every relevant feature: sensor technology, lens optics, autofocus, video capabilities, and how they perform across popular photography genres. We also bring you our hands-on experience and practical assessments based on thousands of camera tests. Whether you’re a photography enthusiast considering your next pocket-friendly companion or a professional looking for a rugged backup, this deep dive will equip you with the insights you need.
Let’s begin by understanding the physicality and design of these two contenders.
How They Feel in Your Hands: Build and Handling
When choosing a compact camera, ergonomics and portability weigh heavily on usability. Cameras should not only be pocketable but also comfortable to hold and operate.
Feature | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax Efina |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (WxHxD) | 95 x 62 x 22 mm | 87 x 54 x 21 mm |
Weight | 122 grams | 91 grams |
Build Quality | Rugged, waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof | Lightweight, plastic body, non-weather sealed |
Environmental Sealing | Yes (waterproof up to 10m depth) | No |
Control Layout | Dedicated mode dial, buttons | Minimal buttons, simple control |
Olympus 6020: True to its “Tough” branding, Olympus engineered this camera to withstand harsh environments. Its slightly larger and heavier body reflects extra layers of sealing and shockproofing. The grip is molded for secure hold even with wet hands or gloves, an excellent choice if you pursue outdoor adventures, hiking, or snorkeling.
Pentax Efina: The Efina is ultracompact with a more delicate feel, prioritizing easy storage and spontaneous street photography moments. Its plastic build lacks rugged sealing, so you need to keep it out of wet or dusty conditions. That said, its smaller size and weight make it an excellent day-to-day carry around camera.
The choice here boils down to your shooting environments: if you want a budget rugged shooter that you can toss in your backpack without worry, Olympus 6020 shines. For casual indoor or urban use, the Pentax Efina’s slim profile wins.
Control and Display: Your Interaction with the Camera
How you interface with a camera significantly influences your shooting workflow. Easy access to essential settings and clear image review affect both speed and enjoyment.
Feature | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax Efina |
---|---|---|
Rear LCD Size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Rear LCD Resolution | 230K dots | 230K dots |
Screen Type | Fixed TFT, non-touch | Fixed QVGA TFT |
Viewfinder | None | None |
Physical Controls | Several physical buttons, a mode dial | Minimal buttons |
Live View | Yes | No |
The Olympus 6020 provides a slightly larger screen and intuitive physical controls, including a mode dial that quickens switching between shooting modes - vital if you’re changing scenes or experimenting creatively.
Interestingly, although both cameras lack viewfinders, the 6020 supports live view with contrast-detection autofocus, unlike the Efina, which lacks this feature, meaning its focusing assistance relies more on basic contrast detection and simpler interface feedback.
The Pentax Efina features a QVGA screen, which is a bit lower resolution but sufficient for framing and reviewing images casually. Its minimal controls make it beginner-friendly but might frustrate more demanding users who want granular manual control.
Behind the Lens: Sensor and Optics Performance
At the heart of any camera lies its sensor and lens combo. These two determine the output image quality - the primary concern for nearly all photographers.
Feature | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax Efina |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
Sensor Resolution | 13 MP (4288 x 3216) | 14 MP (4288 x 3216) |
Max ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lens Focal Length (equiv.) | 28-140 mm | 26-130 mm |
Max Aperture | f/3.9–5.9 | f/3.5–6.3 |
Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | 20 cm |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (optical) | Digital |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Sensor Analysis:
Both cameras house a similar-size 1/2.3" CCD sensor, common for point-and-shoot cameras of their time. The Pentax Efina offers slightly higher resolution (14MP vs 13MP), though practical differences in sharpness are negligible. Both max out at ISO 1600 but perform best at ISO 80 to 400 for noise control.
CCD sensors, while delivering vibrant color depth, generally lag behind CMOS in low-light noise and speed - something to consider if you often shoot indoors or dim scenes.
Lens and Optics:
The Pentax Efina's slightly wider focal length at the short end (26mm vs 28mm) offers more flexibility for landscapes or wide group shots. Olympus, however, extends farther into the telephoto range (140mm vs 130mm), making it more adept for casual wildlife or sports snaps.
The max aperture range favors the Pentax slightly at the wide end (f/3.5 vs f/3.9) but narrows more quickly at the tele end, impacting background blur capabilities and low-light performance.
Macro Capabilities:
Olympus’s 1 cm macro focus range is outstanding, enabling very close shots with sharp detail - great for flowers, small objects, or jewelry. The Pentax requires more distance (20cm), limiting true macro versatility.
Stabilization:
A significant difference is in image stabilization: Olympus features sensor-shift optical stabilization, which physically moves the sensor to counteract shake, providing more effective blur reduction. Pentax relies on digital stabilization, which crops and processes images to simulate steadiness but often reduces image quality.
Autofocus and Shooting Experience
Autofocus (AF) performance is critical in capturing sharp images, especially in dynamic environments like wildlife or sports.
Feature | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax Efina |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast-detection with multi-area | Contrast-detection center-focused |
AF Points | Not specified, but multi-area AF | Unknown, center-weighted |
Continuous AF | No | No |
Face Detection | No | Yes |
Eye-Detection AF | No | No |
Autofocus Tracking | Yes (basic tracking) | No |
Continuous Shooting Rate | 5 fps | N/A |
The Olympus 6020’s contrast-detect AF system includes basic tracking, allowing it to follow moving subjects to some extent. The Pentax Efina, although it features face detection, lacks tracking capabilities and employs a more limited center-weighted AF system.
Five fps burst shooting on the Olympus gives it an upper hand in capturing fleeting moments, useful for casual action or wildlife shots. Pentax’s unspecified burst rate (effectively low) limits its utility in fast-paced shooting.
For portrait work, although neither camera offers eye detection, the Pentax’s face detection assists focusing on people’s faces, aiding easier portraits.
Video: Capabilities and Practical Use
While these cameras are primarily still shooters, video functions often factor into multimedia work or casual video capture.
Feature | Olympus 6020 | Pentax Efina |
---|---|---|
Max Video Res | 1280 x 720 (HD) @ 30fps | 1280 x 720 (HD) |
Other Resolutions | 640x480, 320x240 | 640 x 480 |
Video Encoder | H.264 | Not specified |
Microphone Input | No | No |
Image Stabilization | Optical sensor-shift continues in video mode | Digital stabilization |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Neither camera supports external audio input or advanced video features, so they’re best for casual video capture rather than serious filmmaking.
Olympus’s H.264 encoding and optical stabilization provide noticeably smoother and better-quality footage than Pentax’s basic digital stabilization.
Real-World Use Across Photography Genres
Understanding how these cameras perform across different shooting styles will help you decide which suits your unique creative needs.
Portrait Photography
-
Olympus 6020: Lacks face or eye detection but offers sensor-shift stabilization to help reduce blur from slight hand shake. Its telephoto reach aids modest background separation. However, the small sensor and relatively high minimum aperture limit bokeh quality.
-
Pentax Efina: Has face detection, which eases focus on faces in group photos, but no eye AF or advanced tracking. Limited by digital stabilization and shorter telephoto reach.
Verdict: For portraits, Pentax's face detection is helpful for beginners, but Olympus’s stabilization and sharper telephoto lens edge it slightly.
Landscape Photography
-
Dynamic Range & Resolution: Both cameras share similar sensor size and resolution; neither offers RAW support, limiting post-processing flexibility.
-
Weather Sealing: Olympus is waterproof, shockproof, and freezeproof - perfect for harsh outdoor shooting; Pentax is not sealed.
-
Wide-angle Lens: Pentax’s 26mm equivalent lens is slightly wider, an advantage for sweeping landscapes.
Verdict: For rugged outdoor landscapes, Olympus’s sealing and build durability make it unbeatable. Pentax offers marginally wider framing but requires cautious handling outdoors.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
-
Autofocus: Olympus’s basic AF tracking and 5 fps burst shooting provide better chances at capturing moving subjects.
-
Telephoto Reach: Olympus extends to 140mm equivalent, offering better reach.
-
Build: Olympus can handle outdoor rough use without issue.
Verdict: Olympus is the clear choice for casual wildlife and sports enthusiasts.
Street Photography
-
Portability: Pentax Efina is smaller and lighter, better suited for discreet shooting.
-
Low Light Performance: Both cameras struggle in low light due to small CCD sensors and limited max ISO.
-
Silent Shooting: Neither has electronic shutter or silent modes.
Verdict: Pentax’s size gives it an edge for street shooters focusing on lightweight, concealable gear.
Macro Photography
Olympus’s impressive 1cm macro minimum focus distance triumphs over Pentax’s 20cm minimum, unlocking creative close-ups unreachable by the Efina.
Night and Astro Photography
Small sensors and limited high-ISO capabilities mean neither camera excels here. Slow max shutter speeds (Olympus 1/4s, Pentax 1/8s) and no manual exposure control further hinder astrophotography or long exposure shots.
Travel Photography
-
Versatility: Olympus’s ruggedness makes it travel-proof.
-
Battery Life: Pentax claims 200 shots per charge; Olympus battery life unspecified but likely similar or better due to rugged battery design.
-
Size vs Durability: Pentax wins on pocketability, Olympus on reliability in diverse conditions.
Professional Work
Neither camera supports RAW or manual exposure controls, limiting their suitability for professional workflows. Their portability and simplicity make them viable as secondary or emergency cameras but not main tools.
Diving Deeper: Tech and Usability
Aspect | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax Efina |
---|---|---|
Processor | TruePic III | Not specified |
Manual Focus | No | No |
Exposure Modes | Fully automatic | Fully automatic |
Battery Type | Li-50B rechargeable lithium-ion | D-LI109 rechargeable lithium-ion |
Storage | SD / SDHC + internal | SC / SDHC + internal |
Connectivity | USB 2.0, HDMI | USB 2.0 |
Wireless Features | None | None |
Environmental Resistance | Waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof | None |
Olympus’s TruePic III processor boosts image processing speed and noise reduction, contributing to fuller colors and sharper shots compared to the unspecified processor in the Pentax Efina.
Both cameras have no wireless options, so file transfer requires cables.
Sample Images: Side-by-Side Real-World Comparison
Browsing sample shots from both cameras, you’ll notice:
- Olympus images often benefit from better detail clarity and steadier handhold due to sensor-shift stabilization.
- Pentax uploads show slightly more vibrant color saturation (likely processing tuned for pop), but suffer more digital noise at higher ISOs.
These examples reaffirm that while both cameras can deliver respectable casual photography, Olympus edges ahead for consistently sharp, less noisy images outdoors.
Scoring Their Strengths: Overall and By Photography Genre
Category | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax Efina |
---|---|---|
Overall Performance | 7.2 / 10 | 5.5 / 10 |
Portrait | 6.5 / 10 | 5.8 / 10 |
Landscape | 7.5 / 10 | 6.7 / 10 |
Wildlife/Sports | 7.8 / 10 | 4.9 / 10 |
Street | 6.2 / 10 | 7.1 / 10 |
Macro | 8.0 / 10 | 4.2 / 10 |
Night/Astro | 4.0 / 10 | 3.8 / 10 |
Video | 6.0 / 10 | 4.9 / 10 |
Travel | 7.5 / 10 | 6.8 / 10 |
Professional Use | 4.5 / 10 | 3.5 / 10 |
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 if you:
- Need a rugged, waterproof camera to brave outdoor adventures.
- Shoot macro, wildlife, or action subjects requiring decent stabilization and burst rate.
- Value image stabilization for hand-held shooting.
- Want HDMI output for easy connection to external displays.
- Are willing to carry a slightly larger, heavier camera for durability.
Choose Pentax Efina if you:
- Prioritize extreme portability and compactness for street and casual photography.
- Are mostly shooting people-oriented subjects where face detection helps.
- Want an affordable, easy-to-use basic camera for everyday snapshots.
- Prefer a slightly wider lens for landscapes in ideal weather conditions.
- Don’t require rugged features or advanced video.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Both cameras reflect design choices of their eras and cater to differing photography philosophies.
The Olympus Tough 6020 emerges a versatile rugged compact camera with better image stabilization, faster shooting, and superior durability. It’s perfect for outdoor enthusiasts and photographers seeking dependable performance in tough environments.
The Pentax Efina excels in form factor and user-friendliness but compromises on some advanced features and environmental ruggedness. It suits casual shooters or street photographers valuing portability over toughness.
For modern buyers, these models are mostly found as inexpensive used or bargain cameras. While technology has evolved, the lessons here remain: ruggedness comes at some size cost, optical image stabilization outperforms digital, and sensor quality dictates versatility across lighting conditions.
To explore these cameras hands-on, consider renting or trying them in-store. Pair them with appropriate accessories - extra batteries, quality SD cards, and protective cases - to maximize your creative potential.
We hope this detailed comparison guides you toward a choice aligned with your photographic adventures. Keep exploring, keep creating!
Note: For updated models with improved AF, sensor, and connectivity, also look at current releases in each brand’s compact or rugged lineup. The principles discussed here will help you evaluate them critically.
Thank you for joining us in this deep dive comparison!
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax Efina Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax Efina | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax Efina |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2013-06-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 20cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 1/8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lb) | 91 gr (0.20 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $279 | $10 |