Olympus 6020 vs Samsung EX2F
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34


90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus 6020 vs Samsung EX2F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is fairly similar but the 6020 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.

The 6020 was released 3 years earlier than the EX2F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the 6020 grades vs the EX2F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Samsung EX2F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung EX2F
6020 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus 6020
EX2F | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 35 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung EX2F
6020 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 features outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has proportions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
See the Olympus 6020 vs Samsung EX2F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the 6020 versus the EX2F.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and EX2F is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and EX2F.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 6020 due to its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Olympus 6020 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung EX2F |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) | 294 gr (0.65 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $279 | $478 |