Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Successor is Sigma DP3 Merrill

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus 6020 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is very well matched but the 6020 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

The 6020 was released 24 months earlier than the DP2 Merrill making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the 6020 scores vs the DP2 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
6020 | DP2 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus 6020
DP2 Merrill | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 24 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
6020 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 has got outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 6020 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the 6020 against the DP2 Merrill.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and DP2 Merrill is 95 and 83 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The pic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and DP2 Merrill.
All in all, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 6020 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 6020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 330g (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $279 | $931 |