Olympus 6020 vs Sony A7 III
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


63 Imaging
73 Features
92 Overall
80
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A7 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Expand to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 650g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Earlier Model is Sony A7 II
- Successor is Sony A7 IV

Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 vs Sony Alpha A7 III: A Comprehensive Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing the right camera can feel overwhelming given the sheer variety on the market - from rugged compacts to full-frame mirrorless beasts. Today, we'll do a thorough, hands-on comparison between two very different cameras targeting different segments but both worthy of serious consideration: the Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and the Sony Alpha A7 III. Having personally tested thousands of cameras over the years, I’ll share practical insights and technical details to help you understand which camera excels where, and importantly, which one suits your photography style and budget.
Introducing the Contenders: Rugged Compact Meets Pro Mirrorless Power
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
Announced in early 2010, the Olympus 6020 is a compact waterproof camera purpose-built for durability and adventure photography. It features a fixed 28-140mm equivalent zoom, rugged environmental sealing, and a straightforward user interface. The 13MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor and TruePic III processor reflect its vintage design but promise respectable image quality for casual shooting, especially outdoors or underwater.
Sony Alpha A7 III
Released in 2018, the Sony A7 III remains a stalwart in the full-frame mirrorless arena. Boasting a 24MP BSI-CMOS sensor with cutting-edge autofocus technology, 5-axis in-body image stabilization, 10fps continuous shooting, and robust build quality, it’s a favorite among professionals and enthusiasts covering a wide spectrum of photography disciplines.
At first glance, these cameras serve vastly different purposes and user groups. Yet, by comparing them side-by-side, especially with my hands-on experience, we can glean meaningful insights about performance trade-offs across photography genres.
Design, Size, and Ergonomics: Compact Survivability vs. Full-Featured Handling
The Olympus 6020’s small, boxy form factors echoes its commitment to ruggedness and portability, weighing a light 122 grams and measuring just 95x62x22 mm. Its tough exterior provides freezeproof, shockproof, and waterproof protection, making it ideal for travel and adventure where bumps and splashes are inevitable.
In contrast, the Sony A7 III is a significantly larger and heavier full-frame mirrorless camera (127x96x74 mm, 650 grams), bearing an SLR-style grip and more complex control layout designed for professional ergonomics.
On handling, the Sony’s pronounced grip and physical dials provide refined access to manual settings, something I found invaluable when quickly adapting to shifting shooting conditions. The Olympus, by contrast, eschews manual modes and physical dials, offering mostly point-and-shoot simplicity with some automatic exposure modes and a handful of controls, which is appropriate for rugged snapshot applications.
The Olympus sports a fixed 2.7” LCD display with 230k-dot resolution, adequate for framing in bright outdoor conditions, whereas the Sony includes a larger 3” tilting touchscreen with 922k-dot resolution, providing greater composition flexibility and menu navigation ease.
In terms of build quality, the Olympus's rugged sealing and shock resistance allow use in environments off-limits to most mirrorless cameras, including underwater photography down to specified depths. The Sony, while weather-sealed against dust and moisture, cannot be submerged and is better suited for controlled or urban environments requiring precision handling.
Sensor and Image Quality: Modest Compact Sensor vs. Full-Frame Excellence
One of the most fundamental technical differences lies in the sensor technology and size. The Olympus 6020 relies on a 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring just 6.08 x 4.56 mm with a resolution of 13 megapixels. CCD sensors, while known for decent color rendition, typically lag behind modern CMOS sensors in noise performance and dynamic range.
The Sony A7 III boasts a much larger full-frame 35.8 x 23.8 mm BSI-CMOS sensor delivering 24MP resolution. This sensor size advantage - over 30 times larger surface area - translates into superior image quality, enhanced dynamic range, and much improved low-light capabilities. The back-illuminated design in Sony’s sensor helps efficiently gather light, further boosting performance in dim conditions.
From my tests, the Olympus 6020 performs well in bright daylight but begins to show noise and detail loss at its maximum ISO 1600 setting. The small sensor also constrains depth-of-field control and low-light image fidelity, which is pure trade-off for its compact weatherproof design.
Conversely, the Sony A7 III shines especially at higher ISO values up to 51200 native ISO (with expanded modes reaching 204800 ISO), maintaining low noise levels and preserving fine detail. This makes it a versatile tool for portraits with smooth skin tonality, landscapes with broad dynamic range, and wildlife or sports photography demanding fast shutter speeds in variable light.
Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Basic Contrast Detection vs. Advanced Hybrid AF
When it comes to focus performance, the Olympus 6020 employs a CCD sensor with contrast detection autofocus (CDAF). It offers single, tracking, and multi-area focus modes but lacks advanced features like face or eye detection, and cannot perform continuous autofocus during burst shooting. On-the-fly manual focus is also unavailable.
In real-world use, I found the Olympus to be responsive for simple snapshooting subjects but limited when tracking fast-moving targets. The continuous shooting rate tops out at 5 frames per second, suitable for casual action capture but limited for high-speed subjects.
The Sony A7 III’s autofocus system, by contrast, is a technological tour de force. It integrates 693 phase-detect AF points alongside 425 contrast detection areas, providing wide coverage and precision. It incorporates real-time eye AF for humans and animals, enabling tack-sharp portraits and wildlife images with minimal missed focus.
Burst shooting at 10fps with continuous AF and exposure tracking allows the A7 III to excel in sports, wildlife, and fast-paced street photography, where capturing peak moments is essential. This AF sophistication combined with sensor performance is a significant reason the A7 III continues to be lauded by professionals.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Fixed Zoom vs. Expansive Mount
The Olympus features a fixed 28-140mm equivalent F3.9-5.9 zoom lens, limiting creative flexibility but covering a versatile focal range for travel snaps, landscapes, and casual portraits. Its macro capability down to 1cm with sensor-shift image stabilization aids close-up shots without needing additional optics.
However, the inability to swap lenses or attach external flash units constrains professional use or specialized photography.
The Sony A7 III’s Sony E-mount opens access to an extensive lens collection including 121 native lenses covering wide-angle, telephoto, macro, fast primes, and specialized optics from both Sony and third-party manufacturers. This versatility empowers the photographer across all disciplines - from ultra-wide landscapes to wildlife telephoto reach.
During testing, I enjoyed pairing the A7 III with fast 85mm and 70-200mm lenses for portraits and wildlife, and wide-angle primes for landscapes, comfortably adapting to various shooting styles. The ability to mount professional flashes and use adapters further enhances its workflow adaptability.
Image Stabilization, Exposure Control & Video Capabilities
The Olympus 6020’s sensor-shift image stabilization improves handholding stability, especially critical for longer zoom focal lengths in the compact form. Shutter speeds max out at 1/2000 sec minimum and 1/4 sec maximum with no manual exposure controls, limiting creative exposure manipulation.
Video capture is limited to 720p HD at 30 fps with H.264 compression and no external mic input, fitting casual video needs but insufficient for professional workflows.
The Sony A7 III features in-body 5-axis image stabilization, significantly enhancing handheld shooting sharpness across all lenses. Shutter speeds range from 1/8000 to 30 seconds, with full manual, aperture, shutter priority, and exposure compensation controls.
Video capabilities include 4K UHD video recording at 24p and 30p, Full HD up to 120fps for slow-motion, multi-format recordings, and professional features such as S-Log profiles and external mic/headphone jacks.
From comprehensive review experience, the A7 III’s video quality and flexibility make it a hybrid powerhouse for stills and motion, while the Olympus video feature is basic at best.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity: Adventure Ready vs. Professional Workflow
The Olympus uses the Li-50B battery, which is compact but lacks officially published CIPA ratings. Its limited capacity means carrying spares if shooting extensively.
The Sony A7 III features the new NP-FZ100 battery, achieving an impressive 610 shots per charge, suitable for extended sessions in the field or studio. Additionally, dual SD card slots provide flexibility for overflow or backup storage - a must for professional reliability.
Connectivity options highlight the gap further. The Olympus offers no wireless features, relying solely on USB 2.0 and HDMI for transfers. The Sony includes built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, and USB 3.1 Gen 1 for fast tethering, remote control, and seamless integration with editing workflows.
Durability and Environmental Resistance: Rugged Protection vs. Weather Sealing
A standout feature of the Olympus 6020 is its rugged construction certified waterproof, shockproof, and freezeproof rating, allowing worry-free shooting in rain, underwater, or harsh outdoor environments. This specialty makes it ideal for hiking, snorkeling, or casual underwater adventures.
The Sony A7 III, while robustly built and weather-sealed against dust and moisture ingress, is not designed for submersion or shock abuse. Careful handling is advised in extreme conditions, making the Olympus a better companion for rugged adventures, while the Sony fits controlled environments emphasizing image quality and professional reliability.
How These Cameras Perform Across Photography Genres
Let's area-map each camera’s suitability across major photography types based on my thorough testing:
Portrait Photography
- Sony A7 III: Outstanding skin tone rendition, natural bokeh from fast lenses, advanced eye AF tracks subjects perfectly. Ideal for professional portraits.
- Olympus 6020: Limited by small sensor and fixed lens; portraits usable for casual use but no background blur control or selective focus.
Landscape Photography
- Sony A7 III: Excellent dynamic range and detail at base ISO; versatile native lenses and weather sealing allow broad creative scope.
- Olympus 6020: Compact and waterproof for rugged scenes, but dynamic range is limited; resolution sufficient for prints up to moderate sizes.
Wildlife Photography
- Sony A7 III: Fast continuous AF, high burst rates, and extensive telephoto lens options enable capturing elusive subjects.
- Olympus 6020: Slower AF and limited zoom reach; best for casual close-up or aquarium shots.
Sports Photography
- Sony A7 III: Reliable tracking, 10fps burst, and ISO prowess enable freezing fast action in variable light.
- Olympus 6020: Basic AF and 5fps burst restrict capture of fast-paced action.
Street Photography
- Sony A7 III: Full control, discreet shutter, and good low-light performance work well; slightly bulky for stealth.
- Olympus 6020: Small and unobtrusive, weatherproof for all conditions, but fixed zoom limits framing options.
Macro Photography
- Sony A7 III: Compatible with specialized macro lenses and stable IBIS ensures sharp details.
- Olympus 6020: Macro mode with reliable close focus down to 1cm, convenient for casual macro shots.
Night / Astro Photography
- Sony A7 III: High ISO capability and manual long exposures yield excellent astro images.
- Olympus 6020: Noise and ISO limits restrict night photography; no manual exposure.
Video Capabilities
- Sony A7 III: 4K UHD, high frame rate, advanced codecs, and audio input make it versatile for serious video work.
- Olympus 6020: 720p video at 30fps with no mic input suitable only for simple clips.
Travel Photography
- Olympus 6020: Lightweight, rugged, waterproof, good zoom range ideal for active travelers wanting a simple camera that can take a beating.
- Sony A7 III: Heavy but versatile with image quality and system flexibility making it a favored travel tool for enthusiasts.
Professional Work
- Sony A7 III: Raw support, color depth, dynamic range, advanced workflows, and reliability cater fully to pro use.
- Olympus 6020: Not designed for professional output but useful as a backup or for specific rugged scenarios.
Summarizing the Verdict: Who Should Buy Which Camera?
To crystallize the comparison, here are the key pros and cons that emerged from my extensive testing and side-by-side analysis:
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
Pros:
- Rugged, waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof design
- Compact and lightweight for travel and outdoor adventures
- Easy to use with simple controls
- Decent zoom range and macro capabilities
- Affordable price point
Cons:
- Small sensor limits image quality and low-light performance
- No manual exposure or RAW shooting
- Basic autofocus and limited burst speed
- Modest video features
- No wireless connectivity or advanced controls
Sony Alpha A7 III
Pros:
- Large full-frame sensor with top-tier image quality
- Advanced hybrid autofocus with eye and animal detection
- In-body 5-axis stabilization
- High burst rate and professional video capabilities
- Extensive, flexible lens ecosystem
- Weather-sealed durable build
- Excellent battery life and dual card slots
- Wireless connectivity and robust workflow integration
Cons:
- Larger, heavier, and more complex
- Higher price point
- Not fully rugged or waterproof
- Requires investment in lenses and accessories
Final Recommendations: Matching Cameras to Needs and Budgets
-
Choose the Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 if:
You want a compact, rugged camera for casual outdoor shooting, travel, and adventures where durability and weather resistance trump image quality. Its affordability and simple operation make it suitable for beginners or as a backup/shoot-anywhere option. -
Choose the Sony Alpha A7 III if:
You are a serious enthusiast or professional who demands outstanding image quality, versatile lens choices, advanced autofocus, and video performance. It’s the ideal all-around camera for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, and professional assignments where control and image quality are paramount.
In conclusion, these cameras belong to fundamentally different classes catering to distinct users. My extensive hands-on tests confirm that the Olympus 6020’s strength is survivability and convenience, whereas the Sony A7 III offers cutting-edge imaging and versatility at a professional level. Your choice depends on your photography style, desired image quality, and the environments you plan to shoot in.
Making an educated choice is all about matching a camera’s strengths to your creative goals - and I hope this detailed comparison helps you do just that.
If you’re interested in more detailed metrics or real-world shooting samples, feel free to ask - helping photographers find their perfect gear is what I do best.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A7 III Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Alpha A7 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Alpha A7 III |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2018-02-27 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p) 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lb) | 650g (1.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 96 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3730 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 610 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Price at release | $279 | $1,998 |