Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX1
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Revealed February 2013
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX1 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus 6020 and Sony RX1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) feature different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 6020 was revealed 4 years earlier than the RX1 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the 6020 matches up versus the RX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony RX1
6020 | RX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus 6020
RX1 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | February 2010 | More modern by 37 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer display (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony RX1
6020 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 6020 features outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1 has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6020 and Sony RX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the 6020 compared to the RX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and RX1 is 95 and 79 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and RX1.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 6020 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Sony RX1 will resolve more detail because of its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged 6020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2013-02-19 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-22.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) | 482 grams (1.06 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 93 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $279 | $2,798 |