Olympus 6020 vs Sony W220
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus 6020 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 6020 vs Sony W220 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus 6020 and Sony W220, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the W220 (12MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 6020 was manufactured 13 months after the W220 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the 6020 matches up versus the W220 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 6020 vs Sony W220 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony W220
| 6020 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus 6020
| W220 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony W220
| 6020 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 provides physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony W220 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 6020 and Sony W220 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the 6020 and the W220.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and W220 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The image here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and W220.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus 6020 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern 6020 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 6020 vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) | 147 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $279 | $160 |